CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06813547Updated May 30, 2025

Emotional Freedom Techniques and Virtual Reality Application for Fear of Childbirth

An interventional study of emotional freedom techniques and emotional freedom techniques and virtual reality in Fear of Childbirth, Mental Well-being and Attachment, sponsored by Inonu University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-30.

Sponsored by Inonu University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Fear of labour in primiparous pregnant women is an important factor that directly affects the mother-infant relationship and the mental health of the mother. In this process, it is common for expectant mothers to experience feelings of uncertainty and anxiety about labour. Such intense fear of birth may weaken maternal attachment and make it difficult for her to establish a healthy emotional relationship with her baby. In addition, this fear may negatively affect the mother's mental well-being and increase the risk of depression and anxiety.

In this context, emotional liberation techniques (EFT) and virtual reality (VR) applications stand out as effective nonpharmacological methods used to reduce fear of childbirth in primiparous pregnant women. EFT is a technique that provides relaxation by touching the energy meridians that help the person to regulate negative emotions and cope with stress. SG, on the other hand, allows expectant mothers to interact with simulations similar to the real world in a virtual environment, providing therapeutic benefits through distraction, stress reduction and cognitive restructuring, allowing them to manage their fears about birth and enter the process more prepared. The use of SLT and SG, especially for primiparous pregnant women, can alleviate these women's anxiety about childbirth and enable them to approach the process in a safer and more conscious manner. Thus, it may also help to reduce the negative effects on the mother's postnatal attachment and mental health.

This study aims to examine the effects of SLT and SG practices on fear of childbirth, attachment and mental well-being, and to reveal the effects of these two methods on primiparous pregnant women. In this context, this study will fill the gap in the literature by providing a new perspective in clinical practice and antenatal education programmes and will make important contributions to increase antenatal attachment and mental well-being in primiparous pregnancy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fear of Childbirth
  • Mental Well-being
  • Attachment
  • Emotional Freedom Technique
  • Virtual Reality
  • Primiparous Pregnant Women
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Inonu University is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • No verbal communication problems
  • Primiparous pregnancy
  • 32/0-38/0 weeks of gestation
  • Having a single, viable foetus
  • No psychiatric disorder
  • No obstetric complications
  • Absence of scar tissue or an obstacle to touch at the points of EFT application

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not wanting to continue the research
  • Early labour
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Emotional freedom techniques group

    Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) application group; Participants will receive EFT intervention once a week for four weeks, with pre- and post-assessment using scales and subjective experience units.

    Behavioral: emotional freedom techniques

  • Experimental
    Emotional freedom techniques + virtual reality group

    Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) and Virtual Reality (VR) application group; Participants will receive both EFT and VR interventions once a week for four weeks, with pre- and post-assessment using scales and subjective experience units.

    Behavioral: emotional freedom techniques and virtual reality

  • Other
    Control group

    Control group; Participants will receive standard antenatal care with pre- and post-assessment using scales and subjective experience units, but no EFT or VR intervention.

    Behavioral: control group/ none intervention

Interventions

  • Behavioralemotional freedom techniques

    emotional freedom techniques

  • Behavioralemotional freedom techniques and virtual reality

    emotional freedom techniques and virtual reality

  • Behavioralcontrol group/ none intervention

    None intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wijma Birth Anticipation/Fear Scale - Version A

    The level of fear of labour will be assessed using a validated instrument, the Wijma Birth Anticipation/Fear Scale (Version A). Scores range from 0 to 165, with higher scores indicating higher levels of fear of labour.

    Time frame: 32-38 weeks of gestation

  2. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale - WEMWBS

    Mental well-being will be measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS). Scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating higher mental well-being

    Time frame: 32-38 weeks of gestation

  3. Prenatal Mother-Infant Attachment Prenatal Mother-Infant Attachment Prenatal Mother-Infant Attachment

    Maternal attachment to the unborn baby will be evaluated using the Prenatal Maternal Attachment Scale. Scores range from 21 to 84, with higher scores indicating stronger maternal attachment.

    Time frame: 32-38 weeks of gestation

  4. Subjective Unit Experience Scale

    The scale, which was developed by Hartmann is utilised in EFT applications and enables the individual to categorise their own emotions by evaluating them with numbers. The SUE, a specific EFT instrument, is utilised to ascertain the intensity (degree) of the emotion experienced at the commencement and conclusion of the session. The scale is scored between -10 and +10, with negative numbers denoting negative/unpleasant experiences and positive numbers denoting positive/pleasant experiences.

    Time frame: 32-38 weeks of gestation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Demographic Characteristics of Participants

    Age, education level, marital status, socioeconomic status, gestational week, and previous pregnancy history will be collected using a demographic information form. Group Comparability After Randomization Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics will be analyzed to ensure balance across groups after randomization. Subgroup Analysis Based on Age and Education Level Intervention effects will be examined across subgroups categorized by age and education level. Duration of Fear of Childbirth The duration of childbirth fear (in weeks or months) will be self-reported by participants. Previous Psychological Support History Participants' history of psychological support will be recorded via self-reported questionnaires.

    Time frame: 32-38 weeks of gestation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Sarpourian F, Shafiei E. Virtual reality applications to assist pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03725-5. PubMed 33765969 ↗
  • Koo CH, Park JW, Ryu JH, Han SH. The Effect of Virtual Reality on Preoperative Anxiety: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):3151. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103151. PubMed 33003411 ↗
  • Freitas JRS, Velosa VHS, Abreu LTN, Jardim RL, Santos JAV, Peres B, Campos PF. Virtual Reality Exposure Treatment in Phobias: a Systematic Review. Psychiatr Q. 2021 Dec;92(4):1685-1710. doi: 10.1007/s11126-021-09935-6. Epub 2021 Jun 26. PubMed 34173160 ↗
  • Guven Santur S, Ozsahin Z. The Effects of Emotional Freedom Techniques Implemented During Early Pregnancy on Nausea-Vomiting Severity and Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Integr Complement Med. 2024 Sep;30(9):858-868. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0586. Epub 2024 Mar 27. PubMed 38531058 ↗
  • Maples-Keller JL, Yasinski C, Manjin N, Rothbaum BO. Virtual Reality-Enhanced Extinction of Phobias and Post-Traumatic Stress. Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Jul;14(3):554-563. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0534-y. PubMed 28512692 ↗
  • Bilgic G, Citak Bilgin N. Relationship Between Fear of Childbirth and Psychological and Spiritual Well-Being in Pregnant Women. J Relig Health. 2021 Feb;60(1):295-310. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-01087-4. Epub 2020 Sep 19. PubMed 32949330 ↗
  • Aguilera-Martin A, Galvez-Lara M, Blanco-Ruiz M, Garcia-Torres F. Psychological, educational, and alternative interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women: A systematic review. J Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar;77(3):525-555. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23071. Epub 2020 Oct 20. PubMed 33078851 ↗
  • Anderson CA, Gill M. Childbirth related fears and psychological birth trauma in younger and older age adolescents. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Nov;27(4):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 27. PubMed 24726421 ↗
  • Moller L, Josefsson A, Lilliecreutz C, Gunnervik C, Bladh M, Sydsjo G. Reproduction, fear of childbirth and obstetric outcomes in women treated for fear of childbirth in their first pregnancy: A historical cohort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Mar;98(3):374-381. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13503. Epub 2018 Dec 3. PubMed 30431149 ↗
  • Deliktas A, Kukulu K. Pregnant Women in Turkey Experience Severe Fear of Childbirth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Transcult Nurs. 2019 Sep;30(5):501-511. doi: 10.1177/1043659618823905. Epub 2019 Jan 17. PubMed 30651038 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Even if the participants voluntarily agree to participate in the research in the country we live in, I cannot make this sharing because it is not legal to share the individual data of the participants.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06813547
Lead sponsor
Inonu University
Responsible party
Sinem GUVEN Santur (Res. Assist., Inonu University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 7, 2025
Start date
Jan 31, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 30, 2025

Study contacts

Sinem Güven Santur, Msc
Contact
ysinemguven@gmail.com
00905424640068
Zeliha Özşahin, Dr
study director · Inonu University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion