An observational study in Antiphospholipid Syndrome, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-05.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational
Observational retrospective cohort study to assess clinical outcomes in patients with primary versus secondary antiphospholipid syndrome
Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is an autoimmune disorder associated with positive antiphospholipid antibodies including the lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies IgG or IgM, and/or anti-ß2-glycoprotein IgG or IgM associated with thrombotic problems and pregnancy loss.
Antiphospholipid syndrome is one of the most frequent forms of acquired thrombophilia and is associated with an increased risk of both venous and arterial thrombotic events. Thirty to 40% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have associated antiphospholipid syndrome.
Antiphospholipid syndrome has estimated incidence in the general population of 2.1 (1.4-2.8) per 100 000, and the prevalence of 50 (42-58) per 100 000. APS is more common in female with a female to male ratio is 3.5:1 for primary and 7:1 for secondary.
Antiphospholipid syndrome is divided into two types primary syndrome without an underlying disease, and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome that is associated with another autoimmune syndrome, most commonly Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).
Patients with APS are more at risk of recurrent thrombosis (3). n a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with APS, venous thromboembolism (VTE) was found to be the commonest manifestation (47.5%) followed by arterial thromboembolism (43.1%) then materno fetal problems which were found only in 9.7% of patients, and finally, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) represented in only 2.5 percent of the cases (4).
The clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome include haematological (thrombocytopenia, venous thrombosis), obstetrical (recurrent pregnancy loss), neurological (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, seizures), cardiovascular, dermatological such as livedo reticularis, skin ulceration and necrosis, renal (glomerulonephritis and renal thrombotic microangiopathy), and orthopedic (avascular necrosis of bones).
the manifestation spectrum ranged from asymptomatic antiphospholipid antibodies positivity, various non-criteria manifestations, obstetric morbidity, thrombosis, to life-threatening catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. The wide manifestation spectrum led to a heterogeneous entity and brought challenges to management of the syndrome.
The aim of this study was to compare primary versus secondary effects of antiphospholipid syndrome on the development of thrombosis and its outcomes.
125 studies on the registry are indexed under Antiphospholipid Syndrome; 55 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 161 across 53 observational studies indexed under Antiphospholipid Syndrome.
Browse Antiphospholipid Syndrome studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,050 studies on the registry; 2,174 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Retrospective cohort
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Observational study to compare clinical outcomes of primary versus secondary antiphospholipid syndrome
to compare percentage of patients with primary versus secondary antiphospholipid syndrome in developing recurrent thrombosis
Time frame: 12 months
Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided yet
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.