CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06789328Updated Jul 23, 2025

The Effect of Dexamethasone Administration Route on Pain and Inflammatory Response in PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

A Phase 4 interventional study of perineural Dexamethasone 4mg and intravenous Dexamethsone 4mg in Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Pain Chronic and Hip Arthropathy, sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-23.

Sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effect of the dexamethasone administration route (intravenous vs. perineural) on postoperative pain, inflammatory response, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block. The primary outcome is the intensity of postoperative pain measured using the numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and during movement. Secondary outcomes include the inflammatory response assessed by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction. The findings from this study may contribute to optimizing anesthesia protocols and improving postoperative recovery in patients undergoing THA.

Read the detailed description

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common orthopedic procedure associated with significant postoperative pain and inflammation, which can impact recovery and long-term outcomes. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, have become increasingly popular for pain management in THA due to their ability to provide effective analgesia while preserving motor function.

Dexamethasone is frequently used as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia and reduce inflammation. However, there is limited evidence comparing the efficacy of different administration routes of dexamethasone (intravenous vs. perineural) in the context of PENG block. Additionally, understanding the impact of dexamethasone on postoperative pain, inflammatory markers, and overall patient recovery is crucial for optimizing clinical protocols.

This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial involving patients undergoing elective THA. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups: the IV dexamethasone group or the perineural dexamethasone group. Both groups will receive standardized general anesthesia and PENG block with local anesthetic. Postoperative pain will be assessed using the NRS at various time intervals (e.g., 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively) at rest and during movement. NLR and PLR will measure the inflammatory response from blood samples taken preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.

The primary outcome is time first to request rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes include cumulative opioid consumption, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. Safety and potential complications, such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), will be closely monitored.

The results of this study may provide valuable insights into the optimal use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia for THA, potentially improving pain management, reducing opioid use, and enhancing postoperative recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Hip
  • Hip Pain Chronic
  • Hip Arthropathy
  • Hip Arthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pericapsular nerve group block
  • PENG block
  • adjuvant
  • dexamethasone
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Hip

628 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 121 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 90 across 450 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

Poznan University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 143 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty
  • patients aged >65 and \<100 years
  • patients able to provide informed consent
  • patients able to reliably report symptoms to the research team

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to provide first-party consent due to cognitive impairment or a language barrier
  • infection at the site of the regional block,
  • coagulation disorders,
  • immunodeficiency,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of IV or higher,
  • history of regular steroid medication.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Perineural dexamethasone

    PENG block + perineural dexamethasone

    Drug: perineural Dexamethasone 4mg

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous dexamethasone

    PENG block + intravenous dexamethasone

    Drug: intravenous Dexamethsone 4mg

Interventions

  • Drugperineural Dexamethasone 4mg

    PENG block with 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine + 4mg perineural Dexamethasone

  • Drugintravenous Dexamethsone 4mg

    PENG block with 20ml 0.2% ropivacaine + 4mg intravenous Dexamethasone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to first rescue opioid analgesia

    Time to first rescue opioid analgesia

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total opioid consumption

    Total opioid consumption (mg) converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME)

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  2. NRS

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst pain imaginable")

    Time frame: 4 hours after surgery

  3. NRS

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst pain imaginable")

    Time frame: 8 hours after surgery

  4. NRS

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst pain imaginable")

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  5. NRS

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst pain imaginable")

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  6. NRS

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst pain imaginable")

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  7. NLR

    Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  8. NLR

    Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  9. NLR

    Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  10. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  11. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  12. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  13. Quadriceps muscle strength assessed using medical research council scale [range 0:5]

    uadriceps muscle strength, including knee extension and hip adduction, will be evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength grading scale.

    Time frame: 4 hours after surgery

  14. Quadriceps muscle strength assessed using medical research council scale [range 0:5]

    uadriceps muscle strength, including knee extension and hip adduction, will be evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength grading scale.

    Time frame: 8 hours after surgery

  15. Quadriceps muscle strength assessed using medical research council scale [range 0:5]

    uadriceps muscle strength, including knee extension and hip adduction, will be evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength grading scale.

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  16. Quadriceps muscle strength assessed using medical research council scale [range 0:5]

    uadriceps muscle strength, including knee extension and hip adduction, will be evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength grading scale.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  17. Quadriceps muscle strength assessed using medical research council scale [range 0:5]

    uadriceps muscle strength, including knee extension and hip adduction, will be evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength grading scale.

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  18. Nerve damage

    Nerve damage assessment will be performed using the following grading scale: N0 - No nerve damage N1 - Minor: sensory paresthesia N2 - Major: complete sensory anesthesia N3 - Complete: complete motor deficit with or without paresthesia N4 - CRPS: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  19. Nerve damage

    Nerve damage assessment will be performed using the following grading scale: N0 - No nerve damage N1 - Minor: sensory paresthesia N2 - Major: complete sensory anesthesia N3 - Complete: complete motor deficit with or without paresthesia N4 - CRPS: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  20. Nerve damage

    Nerve damage assessment will be performed using the following grading scale: N0 - No nerve damage N1 - Minor: sensory paresthesia N2 - Major: complete sensory anesthesia N3 - Complete: complete motor deficit with or without paresthesia N4 - CRPS: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  21. glucose

    blood glucose level

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  22. glucose

    blood glucose level

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  23. glucose

    blood glucose level

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences
    Poznan, 60-701, Poland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06789328
Lead sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jul 11, 2025
Last update
Jul 23, 2025

Study contacts

Malgorzata Reysner, M.D. Ph.D.
study chair · Poznań University of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion