ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06784765Updated May 9, 2025

Preventive Use of PIPAC in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

An interventional study of Intervention Group and Control Group in Gastric Cancer, sponsored by National Research Oncology and Transplantology Center, Kazakhstan. Recruiting at 1 site in Kazakhstan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-09.

Sponsored by National Research Oncology and Transplantology Center, Kazakhstan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, multimodal treatment strategies, including perioperative chemotherapy, have significantly improved survival rates. Despite these advances, peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) remains a serious problem, occurring in 60% of cases after radical surgery. PC is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options.

Intra-abdominal chemotherapy, particularly hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC), has demonstrated advantages in the treatment of PC. However, a new technique, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC), is emerging as a promising alternative. PIPAC delivers chemotherapeutic agents directly to the peritoneal surface as an aerosol, allowing deeper penetration of drugs into tumor implants while minimizing toxicity and invasiveness.

This study hypothesizes that the addition of PIPAC as a preoperative treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer may reduce the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to standard therapy. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether preoperative PIPAC reduces the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in these patients.

Read the detailed description

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer globally and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. In patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, multimodal treatment strategies, including perioperative chemotherapy, have significantly improved survival outcomes. However, PC remains a major challenge, often occurring in 60% of cases after radical surgery, and is associated with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options.

Intra-abdominal chemotherapy, particularly HIPEC, has shown benefits in the treatment of PC. However, a newer method, PIPAC, is emerging as a promising alternative. PIPAC delivers chemotherapeutic agents directly to the peritoneal surface via aerosol, ensuring deeper penetration of the drugs into tumor implants and offering lower toxicity and less invasiveness compared to traditional methods.

This study hypothesizes that adding PIPAC as a preoperative treatment in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer may reduce the occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to standard therapy alone. PIPAC will be applied before neoadjuvant chemotherapy to patients at high risk for peritoneal recurrence, with the goal of improving survival rates and reducing recurrence after surgery.

The main objectives of this study are to determine whether preoperative PIPAC reduces the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Secondary objectives include assessing overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs), quality of life (QoL) as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30, postoperative mortality (Clavien-Dindo classification), and pathological response (TRG) in comparison to patients receiving standard treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Cancer

Keywords

  • Gastric Cancer
  • peritoneal carcinomatosis
  • gastrectomy
  • PIPAC
  • FLOT
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

3,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 992 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 66 across 2,499 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

National Research Oncology and Transplantology Center, Kazakhstan is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Adults aged 18-70 years with confirmed locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (T3-4N0-3M0), performance status 0-2, and negative peritoneal cytology.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed
  2. Aged 18-70 years
  3. ECOG performance status 0-2
  4. Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach (T3-4N0-3M0)
  5. Negative peritoneal cytology from diagnostic laparoscopy
  6. No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of distant
  2. Positive peritoneal cytology
  3. Previous cancer treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery)
  4. Severe comorbid conditions contraindicating surgery or chemotherapy
  5. Pregnancy or lactation
  6. Known to study drugs
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PIPAC+FLOT

    ◦ Preventive pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin (10 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2) + perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT regimen) + gastrectomy with D2 D2 lymphadenectomy.

    Procedure: Intervention Group

  • Active comparator
    FLOT

    Retrospective cohort receiving standard perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT regimen) + gastrectomy with D2 D2 lymphadenectomy.

    Procedure: Control Group

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntervention Group

    Preventive pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin (10 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2) + perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT regimen) +gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

    Also known as: doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2), cisplatin (10 mg/m2), perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT regimen), gastrectomy, D2 lymphadenectomy, Preventive pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)

  • ProcedureControl Group

    Retrospective cohort receiving standard perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT regimen) + gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

    Also known as: standard perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT regimen), gastrectomy, D2 lymphadenectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis

    Incidence of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis refers to the frequency or rate at which new cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis are diagnosed within a specific population over a defined period.

    Time frame: 12, 24 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Overall Survival (OS) refers to the length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment for a disease, such as cancer, that patients are still alive.

    Time frame: 1. 3, 5 years after surgery

  2. Disease-free survival

    Disease-Free Survival (DFS) is the period of time after treatment during which a patient shows no signs of the disease.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months after surgery

  3. Quality of life by EORTC QLQ-C30

    Quality of life (assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), which is calculated in points)

    Time frame: before surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery

  4. Frequency of adverse events

    Frequency of Adverse Events (graded by CTCAE v5.0) refers to the rate or proportion of patients experiencing side effects or complications associated with a treatment, categorized according to severity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

    Time frame: through study completion, 30 days after surgery, 90 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Research Oncology Centre
    Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sgarbura O, Eveno C, Alyami M, Bakrin N, Guiral DC, Ceelen W, Delgadillo X, Dellinger T, Di Giorgio A, Kefleyesus A, Khomiakov V, Mortensen MB, Murphy J, Pocard M, Reymond M, Robella M, Rovers KP, So J, Somashekhar SP, Tempfer C, Van der Speeten K, Villeneuve L, Yong WP, Hubner M. Consensus statement for treatment protocols in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum. 2022 Mar 1;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.1515/pp-2022-0102. eCollection 2022 Mar 1. PubMed 35602919 ↗
  • Coccolini F, Nardi M, Montori G, Ceresoli M, Celotti A, Cascinu S, Fugazzola P, Tomasoni M, Glehen O, Catena F, Yonemura Y, Ansaloni L. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric and esophago-gastric cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 20. PubMed 29413875 ↗
  • Al-Batran SE, Lorenzen S. Management of Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: Still a Multidisciplinary Global Challenge? Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2017 Jun;31(3):441-452. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Mar 29. PubMed 28501086 ↗
  • Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Martenson JA. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 6;345(10):725-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010187. PubMed 11547741 ↗
  • Cotte E, Passot G, Gilly FN, Glehen O. Selection of patients and staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010 Jan 15;2(1):31-5. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i1.31. PubMed 21160814 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06784765
Lead sponsor
National Research Oncology and Transplantology Center, Kazakhstan
Collaborators
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Responsible party
Altay Kerimkulov, MD (Principal investigator, National Research Oncology and Transplantology Center, Kazakhstan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 20, 2025
Start date
Jan 15, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 9, 2025

Study contacts

Altay Kerimkulov, MD
Contact
altay.kerimkulov@gmail.com
+77014382825

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion