CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06768164BYQoL-GCUpdated May 20, 2026

Quality of Life After Billroth II or Roux-en-Y for Gastric Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Billroth 2 (B2) and Roux-En-Y (REY) in Gastric (Cardia, Body) Cancer, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-20.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The treatment of a local distal gastric cancer remains surgical before or after chemotherapy. Partial gastrectomy is recommended for distal location cancer The recommendations for restoring continuity are less evident. There are two main techniques: the Roux-En-Y (REY) requiring 2 anastomoses (gastro-jejunostomy and entero-enterostomy) and the Billroth 2 (B2) with a single anastomosis (gastro-jejunostomy). The choice remains matter of debate.

There was no difference on the global health status score from the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. However, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was significantly improved only in the REY group between pre- and post-gastrectomy. A significant difference for endoscopic gastritis in favor of the REY group was reported.

The purpose of this study is to determine which surgical technique improve the health related quality of life after distal gastrectomy.

Read the detailed description

The realization of REY suggests an improvement of the HRQoL after distal gastric resection in comparison to the B2 anastomosis justifying the need of a RCT on the topic. Moreover, the REY could improve the gastro-intestinal symptoms and gastritis. The investigators hypothesize that the REY intervention after distal gastrectomy will improve HRQoL for 3 targeted dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-OG25 questionnaire (eating, reflux, pain and discomfort) in patients with gastric cancer.

All patients with a distal gastric cancer treated in curative intent by surgery with distal gastrectomy should be included. The choice of this population belongs in the fact that no reconstruction according billroth2 are performed for other gastric cancer requiring a total gastrectomy. Therefore, all patients treated by total gastrectomy need to be excluded. Secondly, the increase in survival of this population in the past decade araising to 75% at 5 years allows investigators to question the quality of life after surgery.

The anastomosis is realized with the proximal jejunum without entero-enterostomy in the first 70 cm after the angle of Treitz. The gastrojejunostomy could be ante-colic or trans-mesocolic. The anastomosis could be performed according the surgeon decision (mechanical or handsewn, isoperistaltic or anisoperistaltic).

The length of jejunum of the Y section needs to be at least 60 cm. The Roux-en-Y anastomosis could be antecolic or transmesocolic. The anastomosis could be realized according the surgeon decision (mechanical or handsewn, isoperistaltic or anisoperistaltic).

The choice between these two techniques will not add an increased risk to the patient since they are both recommended by national guidelines, they are both performed as standard care and there is no difference in Quality of Life at long term.

During surgery:

  • A complete exploration of abdominal cavity is realized to avoid presence of peritoneal metastasis. This exploration is allowed by laparoscopy or open surgery
  • The gastric tumor permits to realize R0 resection with 5 cm of resection margin according to the subtotal gastric resection on the line between the right side of gastro-esophageal junction and the end of the left gastro-omental artery
  • In case of Linitis plastica, realization of anatomopathological examination of proximal margin without sign of tumoral involvement to access to randomization The type of surgery (B2 or REY) will be then determined by randomization

Interventions added for the research are:

  • Randomization : the randomization will be realized by the investigator team
  • One endoscopy at 1 year of follow-up after surgery
  • Quality of Life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years of follow-up after surgery

Expected benefits for the participants: Improve HRQoL after distal gastrectomy. Patients will not be exposed to a specific risk as the two methods of reconstruction are described and used in the routine.

The design of the study (without excessive invasive exam) and the routine care monitoring associated to a better HRQoL evaluation compared to the "classic" post-operative follow-up of patient will help patient decision to participate to the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric (Cardia, Body) Cancer

Keywords

  • gastric cancer
  • gastrectomy
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,506 studies on the registry; 1,007 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years, men or women
  • Patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the antrum accessible to a surgical treatment with curative intent by distal gastrectomy. If patients present a linitis plastica, negative proximal and distal margin will be evaluated at the beginning of the surgery before randomization in order to perform a R0 resection
  • Patients with a registration in a national health care system (CMU included) (registered or being a beneficiary of such a scheme)
  • Patients able to understand and fulfill questionnaires in French language
  • Patients having given their written informed consent prior to participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with preoperative peritoneal metastasis or distant metastasis
  • Palliative surgery patients
  • Patients under tutorship or curatorship and protected adults
  • Patients on AME (Aide Médicale de l'Etat = State Medical Assistance)
  • Patients deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision and patients under psychiatric care (admitted to a health or social care establishment)
  • Patients unable to give their consent
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Women of childbearing age without effective contraception
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Billroth 2 (B2)

    Procedure: Billroth 2 (B2)

  • Experimental
    Roux-En-Y (REY)

    Procedure: Roux-En-Y (REY)

Interventions

  • ProcedureBillroth 2 (B2)

    B2 technique requires a single anastomosis (gastro-jejunostomy) after distal gastrectomy

  • ProcedureRoux-En-Y (REY)

    REY technique requires 2 anastomoses (gastro-jejunostomy and entero-enterostomy) after distal gastrectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HRQol with 3 targeted dimensions

    European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, OesophagoGastric 25 (EORTC QLQ-OG25) at 1 year post surgery with 3 targeted dimensions : eating, reflux, pain and discomfort. Health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) will be considered as being improved in one arm if at least one of the 3 targeted dimensions is significantly improved without a significantly deterioration for the other 2 targeted dimensions : * Eating restrictions : \[0-100\]. * Reflux : \[0-100\]. * Pain and discomfort : \[0-100\]. If high scores = more problems.

    Time frame: One year post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Other EORTC QLQ-OG25 dimensions

    Other dimensions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, OesophagoGastric 25 (EORTC QLQ-OG25) questionnaire : * Dysphagia : \[0-100\]. * Odynophagia : \[0-100\]. * Anxiety : \[0-100\]. If high scores = more problems.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery

  2. Other HRQoL dimensions

    Other dimensions of the HRQoL measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 ( European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaires, Core 30) questionnaire will be described at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery : * Physical function : \[0-100\]. * Role function : \[0-100\]. * Emotional function : \[0-100\]. * Cognitive function : \[0-100\]. * Social function : \[0-100\]. * Overall quality of life : \[0-100\]. For these dimensions above if high score = better function. * Pain : \[0-100\]. * Fatigue : \[0-100\]. * Nausea and vomiting : \[0-100\]. For these dimensions above if high score = more problems.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery

  3. Longitudinal changes of each HRQoL dimension

    \- The long-term HRQoL after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years

    Time frame: The long-term HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-OG25 questionnaire) after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years

  4. Longitudinal changes of each HRQoL dimension

    The long-Term HRQoL after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years

    Time frame: et The long-term HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years

  5. The long-term HRQoL after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years

    The long-term HRQoL after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years (EORTC QLQ-C30 )

    Time frame: 2 years post-surgery

  6. The long-term HRQoL after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years

    The long-term HRQoL after surgery for gastric cancer at 2 years (EORTC QLQ-OG25)

    Time frame: 2 years post-surgery

  7. The post-operative morbidity rates at 90 days

    The postoperative morbidity at 90 days will be measured with the several following complications: Surgical site infection / leakage, gastroparesis, gastro-intestinal occlusion, stasis syndrome, dumping syndrome, ulcerative pathology

    Time frame: 90 days post-surgery

  8. The post-operative morbidity rates at 1 year

    The postoperative morbidity at 1 year post surgery will be measured with the several following complications: Surgical site infection / leakage, gastroparesis, gastro-intestinal occlusion, stasis syndrome, dumping syndrome, ulcerative pathology

    Time frame: 1 year post-surgery

  9. The endoscopic biliary reflux rate and gastritis at 1 year post surgery

    The biliary reflux and gastritis will be assessed by endoscopy at 1 year post-surgery

    Time frame: 1 year post-surgery

  10. The rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery

    The use of PPI will be measured by taking PPI in the past week at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery

  11. The survival at 1 year

    The survival at 1 year post-surgery will be recorded by OS and DFS rate. DFS, defined as the time from surgery and locoregional recurrence, occurrence of distant metastases or second gastric cancer, or death (all causes) or the date of the last follow-up, at which point data will be censored. OS, defined as the time from surgery to the death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up, at which point data will be censored.

    Time frame: 1 year post-surgery

  12. The survival at 2 years

    The survival at 2 years post-surgery will be recorded by OS and DFS rate. DFS, defined as the time from surgery and locoregional recurrence, occurrence of distant metastases or second gastric cancer, or death (all causes) or the date of the last follow-up, at which point data will be censored. OS, defined as the time from surgery to the death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up, at which point data will be censored.

    Time frame: 2 years post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06768164
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 10, 2025
Start date
Mar 20, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2031 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2026

Study contacts

Alexandre CHALLINE, MD, PhD
Contact
alexandre.challine@aphp.fr
+33 1 49 28 25 33
Christelle AUGER
Contact
christelle.auger@aphp.fr
+33 1 58 41 11 86
Alexandre CHALLINE, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion