ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06755580Updated Feb 24, 2025

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Sacral Fractures

An observational study in Sacral Fracture, sponsored by F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica. Completed at 1 site in Slovakia. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 77 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-24.

Sponsored by F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
51
Ages
16 Years to 77 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate patients with vertically unstable high-energy sacral fracture operated on at our institution with spinopelvic fixation, to compare the traditionally open method of fixation with the minimally invasive fixation. The aim of the research is to determine whether minimally invasive surgical techniques can achieve comparable fracture reduction and functional outcome as open surgical approaches. Another aim is to determine whether the minimally invasive surgical procedure leads to shorter patient hospitalization, lower perioperative blood loss, and lower postoperative complications.

Read the detailed description

This retrospective study included 51 patients with vertically unstable sacral fracture operated at our institution with open or minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation over a period of 11 years (2014-2024). The patients were divided into two groups. One group of patients underwent open spinopelvic fixation, the other group underwent minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation. Each patient underwent a CT scan before and after surgery. The degree of fracture dislocation and reduction was measured in three planes at each examination. The degree of reduction was divided into four groups according to residual dislocation. In the perioperative period, blood loss, the length of the surgical procedure from the first incision to the suture of the wounds, and radiation exposure were monitored. Intraoperative blood loss was calculated from the waste in the surgical suction system. Functional outcome was assessed one year after surgery. A standardized questionnaire according to the Majeed score was used to assess functional outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sacral Fracture
03

In context

Lead sponsor

F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 77 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients operated at our institution

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient with high energy vertically unstable sacral fracture
  • patients operated with open or minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation
  • patients followed up for at least one year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with low-energy osteoporotic fractures of the sacrum
  • patients with insufficiency fractures of the sacrum
  • patients operated on using a method other than spinopelvic fixation
  • patients who were not followed up for at least one year after surgery
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • patients operated with open spinopelvic fixation

    patients with vertically unstable high-energy sacral fracture operated with traditionally open spinopelvic fixation

    Procedure: spinopelvic fixation

  • patients operated with minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation.

    patients with vertically unstable high-energy sacral fracture operated with minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation

    Procedure: spinopelvic fixation

Interventions

  • Procedurespinopelvic fixation

    open and minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation for unstable or dislocated high-energy sacral fractures

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pelvic ring symmetry

    position of fracture fragments before and after surgery measured in three planes on CT scan

    Time frame: up to 1 year

  2. invasiveness of the surgical procedure

    The invasiveness of the surgical procedure was measured based on perioperative blood loss. Perioperative blood loss was calculated from the waste in the surgical suction system (mililiters)

    Time frame: in perioperative period

  3. length of the surgical procedure

    length of the surgical procedure from the first incision to the suture of the wounds

    Time frame: in perioperative period

  4. radiation exposure of the patient during surgical procedure

    radiation exposure of a patient during a surgical procedure measured by the X-ray machine used during the operation (microgray/m2)

    Time frame: in perioperative period

  5. Functional outcome after surgery based on a standardized questionnaire according to the Majeed score

    One year after surgery, patients fill out a standardized questionnaire according to the Majeed scoring system. Majeed score is a pelvic injury-specific functional assessment that comprises seven items, including pain, work, sitting, sexual intercourse, standing, unaided gait, and walking distance, with a total score range of 0 (worst outcome) to100 (best outcome), in order of decreasing disability.

    Time frame: one year after surgery

  6. complications

    During the observation period, postoperative complications such as wound infection, loosening of osteosynthetic material, loss of reduction, nonunion, and newly developed neurological deficit will be recorded in patients.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica
    Banska Bystrica, 97517, Slovakia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — plan to share all collected IPD

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: starting in January 2025

Access criteria: Data will be shared with medical journals for the purpose of publishing , with Slovak Medical University and with Slovak Medical Library for the purpose of clinical study report

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2014 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 131 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 20, 2024
First posted
Jan 1, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 16, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 18, 2024
Last update
Feb 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06755580
Lead sponsor
F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica
Responsible party
Hrin Tomas, MD (Principal investigator, F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 1, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 16, 2024
Completion
Dec 18, 2024
Last update
Feb 24, 2025

Study contacts

Tomas Hrin, MD
principal investigator · F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion