An observational study in Competency-Based Education, Continuity of Patient Care and Medical Education, sponsored by Walid Mohamed Ragab Mohamed Badwi. Active, not recruiting at 4 sites in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-31.
Sponsored by Walid Mohamed Ragab Mohamed Badwi · Observational
This study explores the evolving landscape of operating room (OR) simulation by identifying key trends, addressing potential biases, and providing actionable recommendations for improvement. Using data-driven analysis, the research uncovers patterns in skill development and decision-making, offering insights into the effectiveness of current OR simulation programs. The study also tackles biases in data collection, including selection and response bias, ensuring the reliability of findings.
The effectiveness of simulation training is crucial in medical education, particularly for skills retention and perceived effectiveness. This section evaluates the overall effectiveness of SimMan3G sessions in enhancing clinical skills among participants.
Objectives
This is the only study on the registry with Walid Mohamed Ragab Mohamed Badwi as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population consists of medical trainees enrolled in the MEDI 045 anesthesia program at King Saud Medical City.
Participants will include individuals with varying levels of clinical experience who are eligible for simulation-based training.
Participants will be randomly selected from a list of eligible trainees in the MEDI 045 program.
Exclusion Criteria:
Change in Cognitive Bias in Clinical Decision-Making
Evaluate the change in cognitive bias during simulated clinical scenarios using the Cognitive Bias Assessment Tool (CBAT). This tool assesses the presence of cognitive biases (e.g., confirmation bias, anchoring bias) in decision-making. The unit of measure will be the percentage of bias-free decisions or correct decisions made by participants, based on the CBAT scoring system. The assessment will occur immediately after simulation training (within 1 day) and again 6 months post-training to measure both immediate and long-term changes in cognitive bias.
Time frame: Immediately after simulation training (within 1 day) Over 6 months post-training
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.