CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06742294PA-REALITYUpdated May 14, 2025

Physical Activity Routines, Education, Assessment, Literacy, and Information Technology Application in Young Children

An interventional study of Movement education in Intervention, Wait-List Control and Healthy, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 6 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-14.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2022, registered Dec 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
435
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Engaging in appropriate volumes of physical activity is important to our current and future health status. Being able to develop habits for physical activity during early years of life may have long lasting benefits throughout individuals' life course. For preschool-aged children, the World Health Organization recommends engagement in a range of activity of varying intensities (from light to vigorous intensities) for 180 minutes every day. However, one local study conducted by the Principal Investigator found that only 12.8% of children from Hong Kong met these recommendations. One key contributing factor to physical activity is one's fundamental movement skills (FMS), such as running, jumping, throwing, and kicking. FMS are considered the prerequisites or "building blocks" of many physical activities and sports. In addition to supporting an active lifestyle, researchers have shown that proficiencies in these skills are associated with better cardiovascular fitness and healthier weight statuses. Building children's fundamental movement skills proficiency from a young age is thus important. "Physical Development" is a development objective under the Hong Kong Kindergarten Education Curriculum. Hence all local preschools provide some form of education to develop children's FMS. However, most preschool teachers have not received formal training in physical education, and standardized curricula in the physical domain is currently unavailable. As such, preschool teachers' ability to instruct and assess children's development in these skills may be limited and suboptimal. Parents are significant influencers in children's development, therefore appropriate support from parents also contribute to the potential successes of the programme. In this study, we aim to address the aforementioned challenges by (1) providing preschool teachers professional development training in pedagogical knowledge and methods in the physical domain, (2) creating a set of teaching materials (in printed and digital formats) and methods that could be incorporated into the overall and preschool-based curricula, (3) creating a parental toolkit with contents mirroring the school materials, to enhance parents' knowledge and promote family-school collaboration, and (4) developing a smartphone-based artificial intelligence rating system to help preschool teachers conveniently and accurately assess children's motor skills, and provide appropriate instructional feedback.

Read the detailed description

Physical activity (PA) is related to better health and well-being of children. Research has also shown that PA is associated with young children's physical, cognitive, and social-emotional developments, which encompass three out of five objectives of pre-primary education in Hong Kong. By contrast, physical inactivity accounts for paediatric overweight/ obesity, which is on a rise globally. Such phenomena emerge as soon as in the first 6 years of lifespan. In 2019, the World Health Organization released their first global PA guidelines for children below 5 years old. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that preschool-aged children should spend at least 180 minutes in a variety of physical activities at any intensity (i.e., light, moderate, or vigorous) daily, of which 60 minutes should be at a moderate intensity or above. However, few preschool-aged children in Hong Kong meet these standards. To address the aforementioned difficulties and challenges, we propose to develop and evaluate an intervention to improve the quantity and quality of PA in preschool-aged children.

To this end, four core intervention components will be applied in the proposed study: 1. Teacher professional development and support. Training and on-going support will be provided to in-service preschool teachers to equip them with knowledge, pedagogical skills, and assessment literacy pertaining physical literacy and FMS instruction. Specific intervention activities and contents will be co-designed with each participating school, and will be integrated to the curriculum and monthly themes of each school.

  1. Development of a smartphone-based FMS-rating machines learning system. To allow efficient and objective assessment of children's FMS, an application will be developed to allow teachers and parents to rate children's FMS using a smartphone application. The application will be based on a machine learning system that was developed, and filed for patent by project team members. Additional information regarding the system will be provided in the sections below.
  1. Teaching materials for teachers. A series of print and digital materials will be developed to support teachers' FMS instruction. The materials will cover key knowledge, pedagogical skills, games and activity ideas pertaining to PA and FMS, where these materials could be adopted into existing school-based curricula and allow for crossdomain instruction (e.g., infusing PA and FMS instruction into storytelling activities).
  1. Parent materials. A set of materials on PA and FMS instruction will be developed for parents. The key concepts and contents will match the developed teaching materials; teachers' and parents' understanding for each development stage will be aligned. In turn, children will be able to receive non-conflicting feedback and instruction from teachers and parents. This form of engagement can foster strong family-school collaboration.

The required sample size was calculated based on a prudent expectation to achieve a small effect (Cohen's d = 0.2) in terms of primary outcome of accelerometer-measured physical activity in preschool-aged children. Using G*Power 3.1.9.4 with a 1:1 experimental versus control ratio, an alpha level at .05 and a power of .8, the required total sample size will be 156. To avoid potential contamination of intervention effects within schools, randomization will be conducted by clusters, at the school level. Based on previous work conducted in Hong Kong, the compliance rate of deployed accelerometers is approximately at 70%. Based on this rate, and from a cluster size of 15 (i.e., 5 children per grade), the effective average cluster size is 10.5. With an intraclass coefficient of .07 (He et al., 2021), the design effect is 1+(10.5-1)*0.07 = 1.67. Therefore, the sample size required is 260, and therefore 26 schools will be recruited to the main trial. From these schools, 13 of them will be randomised to the experimental group, and the remaining 13 will be allocated to the wait-list control group. Participation consent will first be sought at the school level.

Eligible preschools should be 1) government funded or subsidised, 2) coeducational so that the potential findings could be more generalizable in Hong Kong. Parents of all K1-3 children attending the preschools who have agreed to take part will be invited to take part in the research study. To enhance sample representativeness, we will aim at recruiting at even numbers of kindergarten from each region (i.e., Kowloon, Hong Kong Island, the New Territories). We will also purposefully invite preschool-aged children that are attending half-day, full-day, and long full-day preschools. For each participant, data will be collected on three measurement occasions, i.e., at baseline, the end of Year 1 (primary endpoint of the study), and two years after baseline. Randomisation will take place at the school (i.e., cluster) level after baseline measures have been taken. A random number generation sequence conducted by the research team will be employed for the randomisation of preschools to the experimental or control groups. Preschools randomized to the experimental group will be exposed to the intervention between the first two time points. The control group will receive no intervention during the same period, but will be exposed to the same components the following year. Parents who agreed to take part will be invited to complete a questionnaire at each time point. The FMS competence of their children will also be measured at all three times. A subsample of participants (i.e., 5 per grade per school) who agreed to take part will be invited to provide accelerometer measures for their physical activity (MVPA). This study will be based on Social Cognitive theory (SCT; Bandura, 2004). Within SCT, personal factors, the social environment, and behaviours are related intricately and reciprocally. Behaviours of preschool-aged children, by and large, are shaped by key socialising agents (i.e., parents and teachers) and the environments created by these key members. Therefore, SCT is an appropriate framework for the design of PA interventions. In the proposed study, intervention components were designed based on the theoretical underpinnings of SCT. Specifically, intervention components were designed to target six key SCT constructs, namely self-efficacy, behavioural capacity, outcome expectations, self-regulation, social environment, and physical environment.

Quantitative outcomes will be measured at all time points of the proposed study to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, using a clustered randomised controlled trial. Analyses will be conducted by assessors blinded to group allocation. The primary outcomes of the current trial are MVPA and FMS of preschool-aged children. Secondary outcomes include parent-child co-PA, parents' PA, children and parents' sleep time (accelerometry), children and parents' screen time, emotional well-being, socioemotional outcomes, physical health, family PA routines (parent questionnaires), and executive functioning (Head-ToesShoulders task). Teachers' teaching self-efficacy and competence will also be measured as a secondary outcome of the trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intervention
  • Wait-List Control
  • Healthy

Keywords

  • fundamental movement skills
  • teacher professional development
  • RCT
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 487 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • preschool children aged 3-6 with no history of neurological, psychiatric or physical illness

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • preschool children aged 3-6 with with physical illness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
435 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Movement Education

    Schools allocated to the intervention group will receive interventions including teacher professional development and support, smartphone FMS rating system, teacher training materials, parent materials

    Behavioral: Movement education

  • Other
    Wait-list control group

    The wait-list control group will receive the same intervention after post-test

    Behavioral: Movement education

Interventions

  • BehavioralMovement education

    (1) providing preschool teachers professional development training in pedagogical knowledge and methods in the physical domain, (2) creating a set of teaching materials (in printed and digital formats) and methods that could be incorporated into the overall and preschool-based curricula, (3) creating a parental toolkit with contents mirroring the school materials, to enhance parents' knowledge and promote family-school collaboration, and (4) developing a smartphone-based artificial intelligence rating system to help preschool teachers conveniently and accurately assess children's motor skills, and provide appropriate instructional feedback.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)

    ActiGraph GT3X+

    Time frame: baseline

  2. moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)

    ActiGraph GT3X+

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  3. moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)

    ActiGraph GT3X+

    Time frame: two years after baseline (follow-up)

  4. fundamental movement skills performance

    fundamental movement skills (using the developed assessment tool) of preschool children assessed based on TGMD-3

    Time frame: baseline

  5. fundamental movement skills performance

    fundamental movement skills (using the developed assessment tool) of preschool children assessed based on TGMD-3

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  6. fundamental movement skills performance

    fundamental movement skills (using the developed assessment tool) of preschool children assessed based on TGMD-3

    Time frame: two-year after baseline (follow-up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. parent-child co-PA

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: baseline

  2. parent-child co-PA

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  3. parent-child co-PA

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: two-year after baseline (follow-up)

  4. parents' PA

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: baseline

  5. parents' PA

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  6. parents' PA

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: two years after baseline (follow-up)

  7. children and parents' sleep time

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: baseline

  8. children and parents' sleep time

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  9. children and parents' sleep time

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: two years after baseline (follow-up)

  10. children and parents' screen time

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: baseline

  11. children and parents' screen time

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  12. children and parents' screen time

    ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

    Time frame: two years after baseline (follow-up)

  13. socioemotional outcomes, physical health, family PA routines

    Socioemotional outcomes will be measured by the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Using the SDQ, parents respond by reporting if their children fitted 25 attributes related to their emotional problems (e.g., "Often unhappy, downhearted"), conduct problems (e.g., "Often fights with other children"), hyperactivity (e.g., "Easily distracted, concentration wanders"), peer problems (e.g., "Picked on or bullied by other children"), and prosocial behaviours (e.g., "Shares readily with other children"). Parents report how true each item describing their children on a 3-point scale, 1-not real, partly real, completely real. Except for prosocial behaviours items, higher scores indicate less socioemotional well-being.

    Time frame: baseline

  14. socioemotional outcomes, physical health, family PA routines

    Socioemotional outcomes will be measured by the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Using the SDQ, parents respond by reporting if their children fitted 25 attributes related to their emotional problems (e.g., "Often unhappy, downhearted"), conduct problems (e.g., "Often fights with other children"), hyperactivity (e.g., "Easily distracted, concentration wanders"), peer problems (e.g., "Picked on or bullied by other children"), and prosocial behaviours (e.g., "Shares readily with other children"). Parents report how true each item describing their children on a 3-point scale, 1-not real, partly real, completely real. Except for prosocial behaviours items, higher scores indicate less socioemotional well-being.

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  15. socioemotional outcomes, physical health, family PA routines

    Socioemotional outcomes will be measured by the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Using the SDQ, parents respond by reporting if their children fitted 25 attributes related to their emotional problems (e.g., "Often unhappy, downhearted"), conduct problems (e.g., "Often fights with other children"), hyperactivity (e.g., "Easily distracted, concentration wanders"), peer problems (e.g., "Picked on or bullied by other children"), and prosocial behaviours (e.g., "Shares readily with other children"). Parents report how true each item describing their children on a 3-point scale, 1-not real, partly real, completely real. Except for prosocial behaviours items, higher scores indicate less socioemotional well-being.

    Time frame: two years after baseline (follow-up)

  16. executive functioning

    Head-Toes Shoulders task

    Time frame: baseline

  17. executive functioning

    Head-Toes Shoulders task

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  18. executive functioning

    Head-Toes Shoulders task

    Time frame: two years after baseline (follow-up)

  19. Teachers' teaching self-efficacy and competence

    Teachers' self-efficacy in teaching motor skills will be measured using self-report questionnaires. Teachers will report their perceived competence in identifying students' difference, provinding instructions, assessments and using technology in FMS teaching on 23 items. Higher scores indicate better self-efficacy.

    Time frame: baseline

  20. Teachers' teaching self-efficacy and competence

    Teachers' self-efficacy in teaching motor skills will be measured using self-report questionnaires. Teachers will report their perceived competence in identifying students' difference, provinding instructions, assessments and using technology in FMS teaching on 23 items. Higher scores indicate better self-efficacy.

    Time frame: 8 to 10 months after baseline (post-test)

  21. Teachers' teaching self-efficacy and competence

    Teachers' self-efficacy in teaching motor skills will be measured using self-report questionnaires. Teachers will report their perceived competence in identifying students' difference, provinding instructions, assessments and using technology in FMS teaching on 23 items. Higher scores indicate better self-efficacy.

    Time frame: two years after baseline (follow-up)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06742294
Lead sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
University of Wollongong, University of British Columbia, Research Grants Council, Hong Kong
Responsible party
Amy S. Ha (Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 19, 2024
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2025

Study contacts

Amy S. Ha, Ph.D
principal investigator · Chinese University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion