CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06742047Updated Mar 18, 2026Results posted

A Professional Development Programme (ProDeveloP) for Newly Graduated Nurses

An interventional study of Professional development programme in Professional Fulfillment, Professional Identity Formation and Professional Quality of Life, sponsored by Mälardalen University. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Mälardalen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2022, registered Dec 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study aims to implement and evaluate a professional development programme (ProDeveloP) designed to facilitate the transition of newly graduated nurses (NGNs) into their new roles. NGNs face several challenges in the work environment and in developing their professional competencies. The aim is to support NGNs in a county hospital in central Sweden to facilitate their professional development. Data will be collected during the NGNs' first year through measures at week week 13 (for both arms) and quarterly (intervention grpoup). This will be combined with individual interviews and focus groups with NGNs, dialogue facilitators and managers.

Read the detailed description

The primary outcomes will be role clarity, task mastery, social acceptance, recovery and stress. The researchers will compare the results of the primary outcomes with those of a control group measure. Secondary outcomes will be experience of the intervention, transition support, job satisfaction and intention to leave.

Informed consent was signed prior to participation in the study. The ethical application has been approved by the Ethics Authority IS, diary number 2022-05682-0.

02

Conditions studied

  • Professional Fulfillment
  • Professional Identity Formation
  • Professional Quality of Life
  • Support Program
  • Development
  • Nurse Role

Keywords

  • Introduction programme
  • Newly graduated nurses
  • Professional development
  • Role clarity
  • Task mastery
  • Stress
  • Recovery
  • Reflection
  • Social acceptance
  • Transition support
  • Dialogue group
  • Registered nurse
  • Focus group
  • Intervention
  • Interview
  • Intensive measures
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mälardalen University is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Registered nurses in Sweden employed as Newly Graduated Nurses (NGNs) in a county in central Sweden participating in the ProDeveloP, the intervention group.
  • Registered nurses in Sweden employed as Newly Graduated Nurses (NGNs) in a county in central Sweden, NGNs participating in the introduction programme prior to the study, not participating in the ProDeveloP, the control group.
  • Experienced registered nurses as facilitators for the dialogue groups for the NGNs in the intervention.
  • Managers at the county hospital for the NGNs participating in the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Managers without NGNs participated in the intervention.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Participating in the Professional development program (ProDeveloP)

    The group received the intervention of the Professional Development Programme (ProDeveloP). The planning of the ProDeveloP has been done in close collaboration with stakeholders within the hospital setting where the programme will be implemented. The programme includes face-to-face approaches from peer learning and e-learning modalities.

    Behavioral: Professional development programme

  • No intervention
    Control group prior the intervention in 2022

    The group did not receive the intervention but participated in the prior introduction programme in 2022 including 8 educational days.

Interventions

  • BehavioralProfessional development programme

    The professional development programme include dialogue groups facilitated by registered nurses (RN) who are expert and experienced supervisors that received a three day training before conducting the groups. Then including education days with joint lectures and simulations with experts in the field with experience. The programme provides NGNs with regular opportunities for reflection for learning from experiences of care to enhance personal and professional growth.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Role Clarity

    Role clarity, the professional development process in terms of gaining clarity about the responsibilities content and boundaries of the role, was measured with the Validated scale from the Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPS Nordic). A 5-point Likert scale was used with three items. During the last week, how did you feel about: 1. Having clearly defined goals? 2. You know what your responsibilities are? 3. You know exactly what is required of you at work? These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-12. Higher summed scores indicated better outcomes.

    Time frame: The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.

  2. Task Mastery

    Task mastery was measured with the validated scale from Swedish version of the Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (NSFS). A 5-point Likert scale was used with two items. 1. During the last week, have you felt that you have been able to fulfil even the most demanding tasks? 2. During the last week, have you felt that you have been good at doing your job? These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-8. Higher summed scores indicated better outcomes.

    Time frame: The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.

  3. Social Acceptance

    Social acceptance, of being integrated into the work group and belonging at work, was measured with the validated Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (NSFS). A 5-point Likert scale was used with two items. During the last week: I have felt that the people I work with have really cared about me? I have felt included in the work group?A 5-point lickert scale was used. These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-8. Higher summed scores indicated better outcomes.

    Time frame: The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.

  4. Stress

    Stress levels was measured with the validated Stress and Energy Questionnaire (SEQ). A 5-point Likert scale was used with three items. During the last week when you have been working, how often have you felt: 1. Tense? 2. Stressed? 3. Pressured? These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-12. Lower summed scores indicated better outcomes.

    Time frame: The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Job Satiscation

    Job satisfaction was measrued validated Job Satisfaction scale with 5-point lickert scale with three items. How often do you feel about your work in the following ways 1. I feel happy at work? 2. I feel satisfied with the work I have? 3. I feel satisfaction with my work? Range from 'Very seldom or never´(0) och 'Very often or often´ (4). Summed items to between 0-12. Higher scores better outcomes.

    Time frame: Measured during months 4, 8 and 12 after enrollment of the intervention. No control group measurements are available for the secondary outcomes.

  2. Intentions to Leave

    Intentions to leave the workplace or profession was measured by the validated Organizational Commitment on Job Turnover Intention scale. Please respond to the following statements about changing workplace: 1. I often think about leaving my current place of work? 2. As sson as possible I will leave my current workplace? 3. I am actively looking for a job outside my current workplace? Please comment on the following statements about changing profession: 1. I often think about changing profession? 2. I actively look for work outside this profession? 3. I would like to leave this profession as soon as possible? Using a 7-point Likert scale with a range of 'completely incorrrect´ (0) to'completely correct´ (6).

    Time frame: Measured during months 4, 8 and 12 after enrollment of the intervention. No control group measurements are available for the secondary outcomes.

  3. Recovery

    Recovery was measured by the validated Karolinska Sleep Questionnaireith 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much". The Sleep quality of 3 items from the subjective meaning of good sleep from: 1\. Did you have trouble falling asleep last night? 2. How did you sleep last night? 3. Have you slept restlessly? 2 item of being able to let go of work thoughts 1. During the past week, have I had difficulty letting go of thoughts about work during my free time? 2. During the past week, have you been able to relax? 1 items engagement in leisure activities scale of using a 5-point Lickert scale ranging from "never" to "daily". 1\. During the past week, have you been able to do activities that give you energy?

    Time frame: Measured during months 4, 8 and 12 after enrollment of the intervention. No control group measurements are available for the secondary outcomes.

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2026

Participant flow

Participants in the intervention ProDeveloP on 6 February and 9 September 2023, or in the prior introduction programme in 27 November 2022 were recruited in the hospital education centre (n = 101).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParticipating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022
Started6239
Completed3927
Not completed2312

Outcome measures

PrimaryRole Clarity

Role clarity, the professional development process in terms of gaining clarity about the responsibilities content and boundaries of the role, was measured with the Validated scale from the Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPS Nordic). A 5-point Likert scale was used with three items. During the last week, how did you feel about: 1. Having clearly defined goals? 2. You know what your responsibilities are? 3. You know exactly what is required of you at work? These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-12. Higher summed scores indicated better outcomes.

Time frame:
The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Role Clarity
scores on a scaleParticipating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022
Role Clarity9 (6 to 12)9 (3 to 12)
PrimaryTask Mastery

Task mastery was measured with the validated scale from Swedish version of the Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (NSFS). A 5-point Likert scale was used with two items. 1. During the last week, have you felt that you have been able to fulfil even the most demanding tasks? 2. During the last week, have you felt that you have been good at doing your job? These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-8. Higher summed scores indicated better outcomes.

Time frame:
The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Task Mastery
scores on a scaleParticipating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022
Task Mastery6 (4 to 8)6 (3 to 8)
PrimarySocial Acceptance

Social acceptance, of being integrated into the work group and belonging at work, was measured with the validated Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (NSFS). A 5-point Likert scale was used with two items. During the last week: I have felt that the people I work with have really cared about me? I have felt included in the work group?A 5-point lickert scale was used. These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-8. Higher summed scores indicated better outcomes.

Time frame:
The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Social Acceptance
scores on a scaleParticipating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022
Social Acceptance6.5 (3 to 8)7 (2 to 8)
PrimaryStress

Stress levels was measured with the validated Stress and Energy Questionnaire (SEQ). A 5-point Likert scale was used with three items. During the last week when you have been working, how often have you felt: 1. Tense? 2. Stressed? 3. Pressured? These items range from 'Very seldom or never (0)' to 'Very often or always' (4). The items were summed to between 0-12. Lower summed scores indicated better outcomes.

Time frame:
The measurement was collected at one time point at thirteen weeks of participation in the ProDeveloP for the intervention group or in the prior introduction programme for the control group.
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Stress
scores on a scaleParticipating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022
Stress5 (1 to 11)7 (1 to 12)
SecondaryJob Satiscation

Job satisfaction was measrued validated Job Satisfaction scale with 5-point lickert scale with three items. How often do you feel about your work in the following ways 1. I feel happy at work? 2. I feel satisfied with the work I have? 3. I feel satisfaction with my work? Range from 'Very seldom or never´(0) och 'Very often or often´ (4). Summed items to between 0-12. Higher scores better outcomes.

Time frame:
Measured during months 4, 8 and 12 after enrollment of the intervention. No control group measurements are available for the secondary outcomes.

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryIntentions to Leave

Intentions to leave the workplace or profession was measured by the validated Organizational Commitment on Job Turnover Intention scale. Please respond to the following statements about changing workplace: 1. I often think about leaving my current place of work? 2. As sson as possible I will leave my current workplace? 3. I am actively looking for a job outside my current workplace? Please comment on the following statements about changing profession: 1. I often think about changing profession? 2. I actively look for work outside this profession? 3. I would like to leave this profession as soon as possible? Using a 7-point Likert scale with a range of 'completely incorrrect´ (0) to'completely correct´ (6).

Time frame:
Measured during months 4, 8 and 12 after enrollment of the intervention. No control group measurements are available for the secondary outcomes.

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryRecovery

Recovery was measured by the validated Karolinska Sleep Questionnaireith 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much". The Sleep quality of 3 items from the subjective meaning of good sleep from: 1\. Did you have trouble falling asleep last night? 2. How did you sleep last night? 3. Have you slept restlessly? 2 item of being able to let go of work thoughts 1. During the past week, have I had difficulty letting go of thoughts about work during my free time? 2. During the past week, have you been able to relax? 1 items engagement in leisure activities scale of using a 5-point Lickert scale ranging from "never" to "daily". 1\. During the past week, have you been able to do activities that give you energy?

Time frame:
Measured during months 4, 8 and 12 after enrollment of the intervention. No control group measurements are available for the secondary outcomes.

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Enrollment to follow up where 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Participating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)0/62 (0%)0/62 (0%)0/62 (0%)
Control Group Prior the Intervention in 20220/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Participating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022Total
Mean33 ± 7.331 ± 6.832 ± 7.05
Number of weeks of work before programme
Number of weeks of work before programme(number of weeks)Participating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022Total
Mean5.37 ± 5.910.9 ± 5.68.14 ± 5.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Participating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022Total
Female352560
Male426
Parents born outside Sweden
Parents born outside Sweden(participants)Participating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022Total
Number141024
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Participating in the Professional Development Program (ProDeveloP)Control Group Prior the Intervention in 2022Total
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino000
Unknown or Not Reported392766
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mälardalens University
    Västerås, 721 23, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lindblom M, Widarsson M, Sodersved Kallestedt ML, Letterstal A, Nilsson KW, Asp M, Hoglander J. Associations Between Participation in ProDeveloP and Newly Graduated Nurses' Stress and Professional Development When Transitioning into Practice. SAGE Open Nurs. 2026 Feb 9;12:23779608261421265. doi: 10.1177/23779608261421265. eCollection 2026 Jan-Dec. PubMed 41675920 ↗
  • Lindblom M, Hoglander J, Letterstal A, Sodersved Kallestedt ML, Asp M, Widarsson M. Reflection Supports Newly Graduated Nurses' Professional Development When Transitioning Into Practice. J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(7):2948-2960. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17772. Epub 2025 Apr 10. PubMed 40207698 ↗
  • Hoglander J, Lindblom M, Sodersved Kallestedt ML, Letterstal A, Asp M, Widarsson M. Implementing a Professional Development Programme (ProDeveloP) for Newly Graduated Nurses: A Study Protocol. Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(7):243. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070243. PubMed 40710938 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 18, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The ethical approval do not allow to share IPD outside the research group.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06742047
Lead sponsor
Mälardalen University
Collaborators
Region Västmanland, AFA Insurance
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2024
Start date
Nov 27, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 17, 2024
Completion
Oct 1, 2025
Results posted
Mar 18, 2026
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Margareta Asp, Professor
principal investigator · Mälardalens University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion