CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06739837Updated Dec 18, 2024

Comparison of the Effect of a Non-immersive VRE and CT in Patients With Tennis Elbow

An interventional study of traditional physiotherapy and Non-immersive VR therapy in Tennis Elbow, sponsored by Superior University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-18.

Sponsored by Superior University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2024, registered Dec 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality (VR) therapy and conventional physiotherapy in managing tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). Tennis elbow is a painful condition often characterized by chronic pain, reduced grip strength, and limited functionality.

Read the detailed description

Conventional treatment approaches, including manual therapy and strengthening exercises, have been widely used but may not fully address the long-term rehabilitation needs of every patient. Virtual reality, an emerging tool in rehabilitation, has the potential to enhance patient engagement and adherence by providing an interactive therapeutic environment. Participants will be divided into two groups: one receiving VR therapy and the other conventional therapy, with each intervention lasting six weeks. Outcome measures include pain intensity (VAS), functional disability (DASH), patient satisfaction (PRTEE), grip strength, range of motion (ROM), and adherence rates. This study aims to determine if VR therapy can offer superior benefits over conventional

02

Conditions studied

  • Tennis Elbow

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tennis Elbow

284 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 50 across 253 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

Superior University is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 25 to 50 years.
  • Patient diagnosis with lateral epicondylitis.
  • Patients that a medical doctor will be formally diagnosed to have tennis elbow, that is, lateral epicondylitis.
  • Patients who have specific pain and function impairment associated with tennis elbow.
  • Patients giving written consent to participate in the study. Willing to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological conditions whereby they have abnormal functioning of their arms.
  • Any previous surgical intervention for tennis elbow The presence of other significant musculoskeletal diseases in the upper extremity Severe cardiovascular or neurological disorders.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interventional group I

    Diagnostic Test: traditional physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Interventional group II

    Combination Product: Non-immersive VR therapy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testtraditional physiotherapy

    Participants in this arm will undergo traditional physiotherapy exercises for managing tennis elbow.

  • Combination productNon-immersive VR therapy

    Participants undergo a VR-based rehabilitation program targeting tennis elbow symptoms. Sessions last 30 minutes, conducted 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Exercises focus on improving grip strength, wrist flexibility, and functional movement through interactive VR environments that visually engage the affected arm, promoting adherence and motivation without full immersion. The VR setup includes headsets or screens that enable visual interaction, enhancing the rehabilitation experience. The goal is to alleviate pain, increase range of motion, and restore muscle strength.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  2. Handheld Dynamometer

    This instrument is scored using force production in kilograms (0-90) or pounds (0-200). Standardized procedure for positioning of instrumen

    Time frame: 12 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Samahni, Near thq hospital samahni azad kashmir
    Kashmir, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06739837
Lead sponsor
Superior University
Responsible party
Muhammad Naveed Babur (Principal Investigator, Superior University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 18, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2024
Completion
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion