ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06739031Updated Aug 21, 2026

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Electric Field Ablation Devices in the Treatment of Lung Tumors

An interventional study of PEF Treatment in NSCLC, sponsored by Energenx Medical LTD.. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by Energenx Medical LTD. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the efficacy and safety of pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment of early-stage unreseectable non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Safety of PEF treatment of early-stage unreseectable NSCLC patients.
  • Locoregional control of ablated lesions.
  • Survival and quality of life assessment of early-stage unreseectable NSCLC patients.
02

Conditions studied

  • NSCLC
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Energenx Medical LTD. is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria (all requirements must be met at the same time):

1. Age ≥ 18 years old; 2. Pathological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, with the maximum diameter of the tumor ≤ 3 cm and the number ≤ 3; 3. score ≤ 2 points; 5. According to the evaluation of the researcher, it is technically feasible to perform ablation treatment on the lesion; 6. The subject agrees to receive ablation treatment and signs the form.

Exclusion criteria (if any of the above conditions are met, the patient will be excluded):

  1. The subject cannot tolerate or refuses general anesthesia;
  2. Has a history of severe allergic reactions;
  3. Has to bronchoscopy or refuses bronchoscopy;

5. Has active implants in the chest cavity or metal implants in the lung to be treated; 6. Uncorrectable coagulation abnormalities (>1.5 or APTT>1.5 ), with bleeding tendency; anticoagulant therapy and/or antiplatelet drugs are discontinued before ablation for no longer than the prescribed safety period; \<50×10\^9/L; 7. Severe liver and kidney dysfunction, assessed by the researchers as unsuitable for inclusion; 8. Accompanied by infectious diseases that cannot be effectively controlled; 9. Subjects with other severe lung diseases (including severe interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis combined with emphysema, atelectasis, etc.), assessed by the researchers as unsuitable for inclusion 10. Acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents such as acute cerebral infarction, acute coronary syndrome, etc. within 3 months; 11. Subjects with severe cardiac dysfunction; history of severe arrhythmias in the past 2 years, including rapid atrial arrhythmias, any rapid ventricular arrhythmias; history of II degree type II or III degree atrioventricular block; and sinus bradycardia with a heart rate of less than 45 beats per minute, etc.; 12. Subjects have participated in or are participating in other clinical trials within three months; 13. Pregnant, lactating women, or women who plan to become pregnant during the study; 14. Subjects determined by the researchers to have other conditions that are unsuitable for inclusion.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEF Treatment

    Device: PEF Treatment

Interventions

  • DevicePEF Treatment

    PEF Energy ablation of lung tumors

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 6-month complete ablation rate

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical success rate

    Time frame: immediately after the PEF ablation treatment

  2. 6-month pulmonary progression-free survival rate

    Time frame: 6 months after the first PEF ablation treatment

  3. 12-month complete ablation rate

    Time frame: 12 months after the first PEF ablation treatment

  4. 12-month pulmonary progression-free survival rate

    The proportion of subjects with no pulmonary progression (the first ablation lesion maintained no progression, no hilar lymph node metastasis, no new lesions) accounted for the proportion of evaluable subjects who received ablation

    Time frame: 12 months after the first PEF ablation treatment

  5. 12-month overall survival rate

    Time frame: 12 months after the first PEF ablation treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Safety of Intervention

    All adverse events were recorded and evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0 (if applicable), and the relevance to the device itself and the treatment was evaluated. The incidence of device-related and surgical treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events was calculated

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06739031
Lead sponsor
Energenx Medical LTD.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 18, 2024
Start date
Dec 25, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 25, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion