CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06738004NEBSAUpdated Dec 17, 2024

National Emergency Bariatric Surgery Audit

An observational study in Bariatric Surgery, Postoperative Complications and Emergencies, sponsored by Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-17.

Sponsored by Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the incidence, management, and outcomes of complications following bariatric surgery in patients in the United Kingdom. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the prevalence of unplanned interventions due to complications following bariatric surgery in the UK?
  • What are the current practices for managing these complications, and how do they impact patient outcomes?

Participants will:

Be identified from hospitals treating patients presenting with complications following bariatric surgery.

Have their data collected regarding demographics, surgical history, complications, treatments, and outcomes.

Researchers will compare different management strategies and their impact on patient outcomes, with the aim of identifying best practices to improve emergency bariatric care and factors leading to patients attending as an emergency.

Read the detailed description

The National Emergency Bariatric Surgery Audit (NEBSA) is an observational study aimed at investigating the incidence, management, and outcomes of complications following bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom. The detailed description of the protocol includes the following components:

Patient Recruitment and Data Collection:

Patients will be identified in hospitals across the UK where they present for an unplanned intervention to treat a complication related to or following bariatric surgery.

Data on demographics, surgical history, site and type of index bariatric surgery, comorbidities, complications, treatments, and outcomes will be collected through a combination of electronic health records and manual data extraction.

Quality Assurance Plan:

Data checks will be performed to ensure range, completeness and consistency with other data fields in the registry.

Data entry is restricted in most fields of the data form to ensure conformity of the entries and facilitate analysis.

Sample Size Assessment:

This is a prospective observational study, so a sample size assessment is not required. Data collection will continue for a six month period per centre then analysed to report any statistically significant findings.

Plan for Missing Data:

Missing data is reported back to the collaborating sites to complete.

Statistical Analysis Plan:

The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to check variables for Gaussian distribution. Basic demographics will be presented as absolute numbers of participants with the respective percentage per group or as parameter mean and standard deviation or median and range, depending on distribution. For comparisons of interval-scaled variables, unpaired t tests will be performed. Nonparametric between-group testing will be undertaken with 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests. Additionally, the chi-square test or Fisher exact test will be applied to nominal scale data. Multivariable linear regression be performed for differences among baseline demographics. Analyses will be performed in RStudio with significance defined with p \< 0.05.

The NEBSA will provide valuable insights into the prevalence, management, and outcomes of complications following bariatric surgery in the UK. By comparing different management strategies and their impact on patient outcomes, this study aims to identify best practices for emergency bariatric care, ultimately improving patient outcomes and overall healthcare quality. Another important aim is analysing the effect of patient demographics, and engagement with NHS specialised weight loss services on the choice of route for bariatric surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Emergencies
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Quality Improvement
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Emergency complications
  • National audit
  • Surgical outcomes
  • Management strategies
  • United Kingdom
  • Patient safety
  • Quality improvement
  • Morbidity and mortality
  • Postoperative complications
03

In context

Emergencies

1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 333 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 353 across 714 observational studies indexed under Emergencies.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients admitted from these locations i) the emergency department, clinic, urgent care or primary care to the bariatric surgical team as an emergency; ii) from an inpatient team as an urgent referral; iii) a return to theatre following an elective bariatric procedure; iv) another hospital via patient transfer to a specialised unit,with the intent to treat or diagnose complications of bariatric surgery

Inclusion criteria

  • Admissions from i) the emergency department, clinic, urgent care or primary care to the bariatric surgical team as an emergency; ii) from an inpatient team as an urgent referral; iii) a return to theatre following an elective bariatric procedure; iv) another hospital via patient transfer to a specialised unit.
  • Participants undergoing any intervention or procedure to treat or diagnose bariatric complications, (e.g., OGDs, interventional radiology, surgery, supplemental enteral or parenteral nutrition).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age \<18 years old
  • have a length of stay \<24 hrs.
  • initial diagnosis of BSE is changed or if their readmission is found to be unrelated to previous bariatric surgery.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 30-day mortality

    Time in days

    Time frame: up to 30 days from procedure or admission

  2. Inpatient length of stay

    Time in days

    Time frame: Up to 100 weeks from admission

  3. Clavien-Dindo Classification of Complications

    Severity of complication

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency and rate of nutritional support

    Rate of enteral, or parenteral nutritional support

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Frequency and type of interventional radiology

    Need for drains or other radiological procedures

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Frequency and type of surgery, diagnostic or therapeutic procedures

    Description of the type of procedure or intervention required to treat or diagnose complications following bariatric surgery

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 15 years post-op from index surgery

  4. Frequency of admission to critical care units

    Identify need for critical care

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Engagement with NHS specialised weight management services

    Identify engagement with NHS services for bariatric surgery

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 years prior to admission

  6. Site and time of index bariatric surgery

    Whether patient had surgery at the admitting hospital, other site in the UK or abroad

    Time frame: Time from index surgery to admission

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Luton and Dunstable Hospital
    Luton, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06738004
Lead sponsor
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
Alan Askari, Aruna Munasinghe, Omer Al-taan, Fahad Iqbal, Dimitri Pournaras, Matthew Lee, Roxanna Zakeri, Marianne Hollyman
Responsible party
Mohamed Aly (Consultant Upper GI and General Surgeon, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 17, 2024
Start date
Nov 9, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 9, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 9, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 17, 2024

Study contacts

Mohamed Aly, FRCS
Contact
m.aly@nhs.net
01895 279994
Alan Askari, FRCS
Contact
alan.askari@nhs.net
Mohamed Aly, FRCS
principal investigator · The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion