ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06729996PEP-DMUpdated Jul 29, 2026

Pioglitazone Versus Empagliflozin for Chronic Pancreatitis/Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis/Acute Pancreatitis Associated Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pioglitazone (PIO) and Empagliflozin (EMPA) in Pancreatitis, Chronic, Pancreatitis, Acute and Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 111 studies in Pancreatitis, Chronic with a site in United States — 29 open to participants now, 39 under way, none of them phase 3. Pancreatitis, Chronic · United States.

Planned enrollment
24th of 73
50 · median 32
Started
2025
with 5 others
Phase 2
7 of 111
1 open now
Primary completion
2027-05
later than 14 of 38 live
Registered
99th of 111
by date
Lead sponsor
9 of 111
Mayo Clinic

Among the 111 studies in Pancreatitis, Chronic with a site in United States, this one is the 24th largest by planned enrollment of the 73 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2025, is one of 7 in phase 2, reaches primary completion later than 14 of the 38 other live ones, and was the 99th registered.

Pancreatitis, Chronic

264 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis, Chronic; 76 are open to participants now.

Browse Pancreatitis, Chronic studies →

Open to participants now

29 of the 111 studies in Pancreatitis, Chronic with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

23 more — sign in →

All 29 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 49 Pancreatitis, Chronic studies recruiting now, 31 (63%) set no upper age limit and 12 (24%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Get alerts for this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 111 studies in Pancreatitis, Chronic with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of pioglitazone (PIO) versus empagliflozin (EMPA) to improve glycemic control in people with Chronic Pancreatitis (CP) or Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis (RAP) or Acute Pancreatitis (AP) associated with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). To evaluate mixed meal response in PIO versus EMPA group to better understand physiology of both therapies in CP-DM.

Read the detailed description

This trial will test the efficacy of PIO versus EMPA in improving glycemic control in CP-DM, RAP-DM and DM after one episode AP. The anticipated enrollment will consist of 40 subjects, age 18-80 years who have been diagnosed with CP or RAP or AP with DM, at two clinical sites in the United States. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of PIO vs. EMPA to improve glycemic control in people with CP or RAP or AP associated with DM.

03

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatitis, Chronic
  • Pancreatitis, Acute
  • Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • pancreatitis
  • diabetes
  • diabetes mellitus
  • empagliflozin
  • pioglitazone
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18-80 years at the time of enrollment.
  2. RAP or CP with DM diagnosed before or after CP diagnosis (Confirmed CP on imaging or RAP based on PROCEED study criteria, or acute pancreatitis followed by diabetes (AP-DM) and confirmed DM as per ADA criteria or clinically diagnosed with DM and on antihyperglycemic therapy)
  3. Able to provide written and participate in longitudinal follow-up
  4. A Stable retinal exam within 1 year prior to enrollment unless new onset diabetes was diagnosed within 6 months prior to study enrollment. If an eye exam within the past year is not available but the most recent exam is stable, a standard of care eye exam needs to be scheduled during the study period.
  5. level 6.5-10.5% at screening visit.
  6. Current ongoing treatment with metformin and/or insulin and other antihyperglycemic medications will be accepted at screening. Patients will be willing to safely withdraw one or more study medication or mealtime insulin under the supervision of the study team by the time of screening. The patients clinical team will be informed promptly. Patients not on any antihyperglycemic medications are also eligible.

    a. If on a GLP-1 medication (e.g., semaglutide [Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus], liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, tirzepatide, etc.), the patient must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to enrollment, with stable weight status at the time of enrollment and the GLP-1 dose cannot be escalated during the study period.

  7. Willing to perform blood glucose and ketone testing on study provided meters as per study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to take PIO or EMPA due to prior or allergic reaction or current use of medications with potential for drug-drug interactions (Pioglitazone: Drug information - UpToDate, Empagliflozin: Drug information - UpToDate)
  2. Patients on PIO or EMPA at the time of screening
  3. Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes
  4. Pregnancy or lactation in women (positive urine pregnancy test at screening will lead to exclusion)
  5. History of bleeding disorders (e.g., Hemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency), hemophilia B (factor IX deficiency), von Willebrand disease, disorders etc)
  6. Presence of hepatic impairment, >3 x with no etiology known at the time of enrollment or any evidence of acute/chronic liver disease
  7. Ongoing treatment for any requiring systemic treatment (non-melanoma skin cancers treated in dermatologists' office would be acceptable)
  8. Presence of osteoporosis without definitive treatment according to PI discretion.
  9. Recent inflammatory illness within the 30 days preceding enrollment (e.g.: URTI, episode of AP, etc)
  10. History of heart failure classified by as Class III or greater
  11. History of kidney dysfunction classified by an of \<30 mL/min/min
  12. Participation in any clinical trial within 30 days before screening for an approved or non-approved medical product.
  13. Active alcohol dependence or chemical dependence including tobacco based on investigator discretion
  14. On a ketogenic diet
  15. pancreatitis, obstructive pancreatitis, and prior surgery of pancreas (Whipple procedure, total pancreatectomy, and distal pancreatectomy)
  16. Any condition which could jeopardize participant safety as per investigator opinion, (hemolytic anemia limiting A1c reliability, any evidence of fluid overload, presence of Congestive heart failure etc).
  17. Recent DKA or signs of decompensated diabetes in last 6 months or increased β hydroxybutyrate levels (>0.4 mmol/L) at screening.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorized to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pioglitazone (PIO)

    PIO (Actos) is a thiazolidinedione and an agonist for peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) gamma indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 DM in multiple clinical settings. Its use has limitation for type 1 DM or for treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis. It is contraindicated to use in established NYHA class III or IV heart failure.

    Drug: Pioglitazone (PIO)

  • Experimental
    Empagliflozin (EMPA)

    EMPA is a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, FDA approved drug. It is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in adults with heart failure, to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 DM and established cardiovascular disease and as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 DM. It is not recommended in patients with type 1 DM. It may increase the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis. Not recommended for use to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 DM with an eGFR less than 30mL/min/1.73m2.

    Drug: Empagliflozin (EMPA)

Interventions

  • Subjects will take 30 mg tablet, once daily in the morning, taken with or without food for 12 weeks and after 12 weeks dose will be escalated to 45 mg based on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (HbA1c \>7.0% at 12 weeks, escalate the dose) once daily in the morning, taken with or without food till 24 weeks.

  • Subjects will start with 10 mg dose, once daily in the morning, taken with or without food for 12 weeks and after 12 weeks dose will be escalated to 25 mg based on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (HbA1c \>7.0% at 12 weeks, escalate the dose) once daily in the morning, taken with or without food.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

    Hemoglobin is a protein within red blood cells. As glucose enters the bloodstream, it binds to hemoglobin, or glycates. The more glucose that enters the bloodstream, the higher the amount of glycated hemoglobin. An HbA1C level below 5.7 percent is considered normal. Reported as percentage of glycated hemoglobin

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  2. Area under curve (AUC) for glucose

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for glucose

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  3. AUC for C-peptide

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for C-Peptide

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  4. AUC for Insulin

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for Insulin

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  5. AUC for glucagon

    Pre-post study difference in AUC for glucagon

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fasting plasma glucose

    Pre-post study difference in Fasting plasma glucose

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  2. Lean mass

    Pre-post study difference in lean mass

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  3. Fat mass

    Pre-post study difference in fat mass

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  4. Visceral fat

    Pre-post study difference in visceral fat

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  5. Fecal elastase

    Pre-post study difference in Fecal elastase (ELISA quantitative test, normal \>200 mcg/g)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  6. High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

    Pre-post study difference in Hs-CRP

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  7. Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and Triglyceride

    Pre-post study difference in Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and Triglyceride

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  8. β-Hydroxybutyrate

    Pre-post study difference in β-Hydroxybutyrate

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  9. Body weight

    Pre-post study difference in body weight

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  10. Blood Pressure

    Pre-post study difference in Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  11. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Pre-post study difference in BMI

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  12. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - 29 Profile v2.1 (PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1)

    The PROMIS-29 Profile assesses following domains: * Physical function * Pain interference * Anxiety * Depression * Fatigue * Sleep disturbance * Ability to participate in social roles and activities PROMIS-29 is scored using T-scores. Higher T-scores indicate a higher level of the underlying construct. Each domain has a set of questions, typically 4 to 6 items, and responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., "Never," "Rarely," "Sometimes," "Often," "Always" or "Not at all," "A little bit," "Somewhat," etc.). The responses are then scored on a T-score scale (with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population). T-scores Interpretation: * A T-score of 50 is the average score for the general population. * T-scores above 50 indicate better functioning or less severe symptoms. * T-scores below 50 indicate worse functioning or more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  13. Insulin sensitivity

    Change in sensitivity from baseline vs 24 weeks (Homeostatic Model Assessment, Matsuda Index)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  14. Beta cell function

    Change in Beta cell function from baseline vs 24 weeks using oral disposition index

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Ketosis

    Percentage of participants experiencing Ketosis based on meter data

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  2. Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) events

    Number of DKA events

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  3. Insulin needs

    Percentage of participants experiencing requirement for insulin

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  4. Chronic pancreatitis exacerbation

    Percentage of participants experiencing CP exacerbation

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  5. Acute pancreatitis episodes

    Percentage of participants experiencing AP episodes

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  6. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

    Percentage of participants experiencing incident exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  7. Vitamin D

    Decrease in vitamin D

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  8. Bone fractures

    Percentage of participants experiencing bone fractures

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

  9. Adverse events

    Adverse events: Anemia, edema, urinary tract infection, Vaginal yeast infection

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks

07

Study locations

2 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2024
First posted
Dec 12, 2024
StartActual
May 29, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2027
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06729996
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Responsible party
Yogish C. Kudva (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 12, 2024
Start date
May 29, 2025
Primary completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Ravinder Jeet Kaur, M.B.B.S
Contact
Kaur.ravinder@mayo.edu
507-255-1455
Yogish Kudva
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Pioglitazone · Empagliflozin

Start the discussion