CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06714851MOVIPLUSUpdated May 16, 2025

Chondractiv Move on Activity-related Joint Discomfort

An interventional study of Chondractiv Move and Placebo in Joint; Derangement, sponsored by Symrise Group. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-16.

Sponsored by Symrise Group · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Joint discomfort, manifested as knee pain or gonalgia, is a common problem not only among athletes, but also among people who regularly take part in physical activities and sports. This discomfort can limit mobility and flexibility, even in healthy people who do not suffer from osteoarthritis or other joint diseases. Functional joint discomfort is also due to joint stress and the short-term deterioration of cartilage. The processes of cartilage formation and degradation lose their balance under load, and discomfort is felt for some time after exercise. These conditions and symptoms occur long before the onset of a disease such as osteoarthritis.

Dietary supplements based on herbs or collagen derivatives (a protein involved in maintaining the structure of tissues, including those of the joints) are frequently used to alleviate the discomfort associated with joint disorders and improve the balance between cartilage synthesis and degradation.

This study aims to assess the effect of the dietary supplement "Chondractiv Move" (named "Chondractiv Boost" at the time of protocol writing) on joint discomfort induced by physical activity. This is a combination of rosehip extract and hydrolyzed chicken cartilage containing collagen type II, chondroitin sulfate, and hyaluronic acid as main actives. This combination is chosen based on the results of studies showing the beneficial effects on joints of the ingredients.

Read the detailed description

This study requires the inclusion of about 140 participants who regularly take part in sporting activities and report knee pain during and/or after this activity.

Participants are randomly assigned to the control group receiving a placebo (a neutral product based on maltodextrins with no effect), or to the test group receiving the dietary supplement. This study is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. This means that participants as well as assessors do not know the allocation group. This is a necessary procedure to guarantee impartiality in clinical trials.

Participants ingest placebo or dietary supplement for 8 consecutive weeks (or 12 weeks in the ancillary group with extended supplementation duration).

To assess the effect of supplementation, participants are asked to attend medical check-ups and complete questionnaires, before starting the treatment to determine basal values, and then at regular intervals, i.e. every 2 weeks or every month.

Throughout their participation, participants are monitored by the study doctor and must go to a clinical investigation center for doctors visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Joint; Derangement

Keywords

  • Activity-related joint discomfort
  • Collagen hydrolysate
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Symrise Group is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Body mass index ≥ 18.5 and \< 30.0 kg/m2.
  • Physically active: joint bearing sports (i.e., but not limited to soccer, basketball, handball, volleyball, tennis, running) for at least 3 hours per week or 2 times per week.
  • Who self-report activity-related discomfort or reversible knee-joint discomfort during or immediately after physical activity over a period of at least 2 months.
  • Who experience pain intensity of 5 (out of 10 on the 11 point-NRS) during the stress joint test (SLSD) and perform at least 25 repetitions.
  • Who have no trouble swallowing capsules
  • Having a smartphone allowing using the e-PRO App NursTrial®.
  • Affiliated to a French Health insurance scheme.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With diagnosed injury/trauma or tendinopathy (wiper syndrome, patellofemoral syndrome, meniscopathy), algodystrophy, osteoarthritis, rheumatic arthritis or inflammation, or other knee or joint disease.
  • Extreme pain symptoms that required high-dose analgesic therapy over a longer period (>2 weeks) or intra-articular injection treatment.
  • Untreated or unstable hypothyroidism, or evidence of any neurological disorders.
  • Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the experimental products (i.e., dog rose).
  • Intra-articular injections or infiltrations with hyaluronic acid, plasma-rich platelet, glucosamine, chondroitin, or supplementation, with glucosamine, chondroitin, collagen-based products in the last 3 months, or spa therapy related to join health in the last 6 months.
  • Current intake of corrective treatment, plant-based products or dietary supplements that could interfere with joint, tendon or bone metabolism.
  • May not be compliant or may not respect the constraints imposed by the protocol (i.e., stable physical activities and dietary habits throughout the study).
  • Enrolled in another clinical trial or being in a period of exclusion from a previous clinical trial.
  • For woman of childbearing age (neither menopausal, nor hysterectomised, nor sterilized): not using effective contraception (oral contraceptives, intra-uterine device, contraceptive implant, or condoms).
  • Belonging to a population covered by articles L.1121-5 (pregnant confirmed by urinary test at inclusion or breastfeeding women), L.1121-6 (persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons under psychiatric care), and L.1121.8 (adults under legal protection or unable to express their consent) of the CSP (French Public Health Code).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
144 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chondractiv Move

    8-week supplementation (12 weeks in ancillary subgroup) with 4 capsules/day

    Dietary Supplement: Chondractiv Move

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    8-week supplementation (12 weeks in ancillary subgroup) with 4 capsules/day

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementChondractiv Move

    The dietary supplement under study (Chondractiv Move) is a combination of 2 active ingredients: Hydrolyzed chicken cartilage and Rosehip extract at the dose of 1580 mg/day.

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo contains 100% maltodextrins as non-active agent at the dose of 1800 mg/day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline of activity-related joint discomfort at 8 weeks

    The pain-related activity is assessed by 0-10 Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) during SLSD (Single-Leg-Step-Down) test.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (Day 56)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline of activity-related joint discomfort at 4 weeks.

    The pain-related activity is assessed by 0-10 Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) during SLSD (Single-Leg-Step-Down) test.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 28)

  2. Change from baseline of activity-related joint discomfort at 12 weeks

    The pain-related activity is assessed by 0-10 Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) during SLSD (Single-Leg-Step-Down) test.This outcome is only measured in ancillary group.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 84)

  3. Activity-related pain at regular exercise/physical activity

    Average weekly pain intensity at exercise measured using 0-100 VAS (0 meaning no pain, 100 worst possible pain). At each training session or competition, the subject rates the intensity of pain perceived at exercise.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 84)

  4. Change from baseline on overall physical function at 2 weeks

    Overall physical function is measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), that consists of 42 items assessing 5 dimensions: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sport/recreation, knee related Quality of Life (QoL). KOOS is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 2 weeks (Day 14)

  5. Change from baseline on overall physical function at 4 weeks

    Overall physical function is measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), that consists of 42 items assessing 5 dimensions: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sport/recreation, knee related Quality of Life (QoL). KOOS is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 28)

  6. Change from baseline on overall physical function at 6 weeks

    Overall physical function is measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), that consists of 42 items assessing 5 dimensions: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sport/recreation, knee related Quality of Life (QoL). KOOS is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 6 weeks (Day 42)

  7. Change from baseline on overall physical function at 8 weeks

    Overall physical function is measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), that consists of 42 items assessing 5 dimensions: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sport/recreation, knee related Quality of Life (QoL). KOOS is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (Day 56)

  8. Change from baseline on overall physical function at 10 weeks

    Overall physical function is measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), that consists of 42 items assessing 5 dimensions: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sport/recreation, knee related Quality of Life (QoL). KOOS is a self-assessed questionnaire. At week 10, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 10 weeks (Day 70)

  9. Change from baseline on overall physical function at 12 weeks

    Overall physical function is measured using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), that consists of 42 items assessing 5 dimensions: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sport/recreation, knee related Quality of Life (QoL). KOOS is a self-assessed questionnaire. At week 12, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 12 weeks (Day 84)

  10. Change from baseline of knee mobility at 4 weeks

    Flexion and extension degrees of the knee measured using the Knee Range of Motion (ROM). Measures is carried out by the investigator using a goniometer.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 28)

  11. Change from baseline of knee mobility at 8 weeks

    Flexion and extension degrees of the knee measured using the Knee Range of Motion (ROM). Measures is carried out by the investigator using a goniometer.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (D56)

  12. Change from baseline of knee mobility at 12 weeks

    Flexion and extension degrees of the knee measured using the Knee Range of Motion (ROM). Measures is carried out by the investigator using a goniometer. At week 12, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 12 weeks (Day 84)

  13. Change from baseline of quality of life at 4 weeks

    Quality of life measured using the SF-12, that consists of 12 item-short form of the generic Health-related Quality of Life SF-36. The questionnaire is a self-assessment.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 28)

  14. Change from baseline of quality of life at 8 weeks

    Quality of life measured using the SF-12, that consists of 12 item-short form of the generic Health-related Quality of Life SF-36. The questionnaire is a self-assessment.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (Day 56)

  15. Change from baseline of quality of life at 12 weeks

    Quality of life measured using the SF-12, that consists of 12 item-short form of the generic Health-related Quality of Life SF-36. The questionnaire is a self-assessment. At week 12, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 12 weeks (Day 84)

  16. Satisfaction with the supplementation

    Satisfaction is assessed using a questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale ((1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree)) or 4-point Likert scale ((1) Entirely satisfied; (2) Satisfied; (3) Not satisfied; (4) Not satisfied at all), to questions related to the perceived effectiveness.

    Time frame: 8 weeks (Day 56) or 12 weeks (D84) for ancillary group

Other outcomes

  1. Change from baseline of experience of joint pain at 2 weeks

    Pain is measured using the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, that consists of 11 items divided into two domains: a 5-item scale for constant pain and a 6-item scale for intermittent pain. ICOAP is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 2 weeks (Day 14)

  2. Change from baseline of experience of joint pain at 4 weeks

    Pain is measured using the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, that consists of 11 items divided into two domains: a 5-item scale for constant pain and a 6-item scale for intermittent pain. ICOAP is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 28)

  3. Change from baseline of experience of joint pain at 6 weeks

    Pain is measured using the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, that consists of 11 items divided into two domains: a 5-item scale for constant pain and a 6-item scale for intermittent pain. ICOAP is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 6 weeks (Day 42)

  4. Change from baseline of experience of joint pain at 8 weeks

    Pain is measured using the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, that consists of 11 items divided into two domains: a 5-item scale for constant pain and a 6-item scale for intermittent pain. ICOAP is a self-assessed questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (Day 56)

  5. Change from baseline of experience of joint pain at 10 weeks

    Pain is measured using the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, that consists of 11 items divided into two domains: a 5-item scale for constant pain and a 6-item scale for intermittent pain. ICOAP is a self-assessed questionnaire. At week 10, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 10 weeks (Day 70)]

  6. Change from baseline of experience of joint pain at 12 weeks

    Pain is measured using the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire, that consists of 11 items divided into two domains: a 5-item scale for constant pain and a 6-item scale for intermittent pain. ICOAP is a self-assessed questionnaire. At week 12, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 12 weeks (Day 84)

  7. Change from baseline in cartilage synthesis at 8 weeks

    Serum concentrations of Type IIA collagen N-propeptide are measured using ELISA assays.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (Day 56)

  8. Change from baseline in cartilage degradation at 8 weeks

    Serum concentrations of Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) are measured using ELISA assays.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (Day 56)]

  9. Impression improvement of joint function/discomfort at 2 weeks

    Subjective impression of improvement is self-assessed by the subject using a 5-point Likert scale: ((1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree)) in response to "Since I started the supplementation, I am feeling an improvement: of my knee mobility/ knee stiffness/ joint comfort during physical activity/ joint comfort during daily activities".

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 2 weeks (Day 14)

  10. Impression improvement of joint function/discomfort at 4 weeks

    Subjective impression of improvement is self-assessed by the subject using a 5-point Likert scale: ((1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree)) in response to "Since I started the supplementation, I am feeling an improvement: of my knee mobility/ knee stiffness/ joint comfort during physical activity/ joint comfort during daily activities".

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 4 weeks (Day 28)

  11. Impression improvement of joint function/discomfort at 6 weeks

    Subjective impression of improvement is self-assessed by the subject using a 5-point Likert scale: ((1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree)) in response to "Since I started the supplementation, I am feeling an improvement: of my knee mobility/ knee stiffness/ joint comfort during physical activity/ joint comfort during daily activities".

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 6 weeks (Day 42)

  12. Impression improvement of joint function/discomfort at 8 weeks

    Subjective impression of improvement is self-assessed by the subject using a 5-point Likert scale: ((1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree)) in response to "Since I started the supplementation, I am feeling an improvement: of my knee mobility/ knee stiffness/ joint comfort during physical activity/ joint comfort during daily activities".

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 8 weeks (Day 56)

  13. Impression improvement of joint function/discomfort at 10 weeks

    Subjective impression of improvement is self-assessed by the subject using a 5-point Likert scale: ((1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree)) in response to "Since I started the supplementation, I am feeling an improvement: of my knee mobility/ knee stiffness/ joint comfort during physical activity/ joint comfort during daily activities". At week 10, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 10 weeks (Day 70)

  14. Impression improvement of joint function/discomfort at 12 weeks

    Subjective impression of improvement is self-assessed by the subject using a 5-point Likert scale: ((1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree)) in response to "Since I started the supplementation, I am feeling an improvement: of my knee mobility/ knee stiffness/ joint comfort during physical activity/ joint comfort during daily activities". At week 12, outcome is only measured in ancillary subgroup.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 12 weeks (Day 84)

  15. Evaluation of therapeutic saving

    Consumption of anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs taken to relieve knee pain (name, number, dose) and recorded by the subject from Day 0 to Day 56, and Day 0 to Day 84 in ancillary subgroup. Drug consumption is expressed as equivalent doses of ibuprofen or paracetamol.

    Time frame: 8 weeks (Day 56) or 12 weeks (Day 84) in ancillary subgroup

  16. Adverse effect

    Adverse events are described using the MedDRA dictionary. Adverse event with possible relation to the experimental products are classified by type of adverse reaction.

    Time frame: 8 weeks (Day 56) or 12 weeks (Day 84) in ancillary subgroup

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cen Experimental
    Dijon, 21000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Subjects data is not anonymized. To comply with European regulations and national provisions, subjects are informed that no sharing of IPD is planned in order to protect their personal data. If data is to be shared, patients must be informed individually, and their consent obtained. At this stage, only aggregated data can be shared

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06714851
Lead sponsor
Symrise Group
Collaborators
CEN Biotech
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 4, 2024
Start date
Nov 25, 2024
Primary completion
May 9, 2025
Completion
May 9, 2025
Last update
May 16, 2025

Study contacts

Christine JUHEL, Ph.D
study chair · CEN Biotech
Carole PERRIN, MD
principal investigator · CEN Biotech

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion