ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06712420NEOGBUpdated Apr 16, 2025

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gall Bladder Cancer : a Randomized Control Trial (NEOGB)

A Phase 3 interventional study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and curative surgery in Gall Bladder Carcinoma, sponsored by Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center, India. Recruiting at 3 sites in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-16.

Sponsored by Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center, India · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

to study role of chemotherapy treatment for gall bladder cancer before surgery as compared to surgery directly

Read the detailed description

Gallbladder cancer is a highly aggressive disease with a late presentation and poor prognosis. Complete surgical excision remains the only potentially curative treatment for early-stage gallbladder cancer.

The use and benefit of chemotherapy in gallbladder cancer before surgery , that is , in the neoadjuvant setting, is not well studied and, to our knowledge, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been evaluated in any randomized clinical trial.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy aims to achieve tumor downstaging, increase the radical surgical resection rate, reduce metastases. This study will compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy before surgery in locally advanced gall bladder cancer versus upfront surgery with respect to survival and completeness of resection of disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gall Bladder Carcinoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • gallbladder, locally advanced, neoadjuvant
03

In context

Gallbladder Neoplasms

301 studies on the registry are indexed under Gallbladder Neoplasms; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 114 is above the median of 56 across 222 interventional studies indexed under Gallbladder Neoplasms.

Browse Gallbladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center, India is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 0-2
  • Locally advanced resectable GBC defined as Clinical T3/4 disease or Regional LN involvement on imaging studies.
  • Post cholecystectomy GBC with residual disease on imaging, History of bile spillage during primary surgery , history of piece-meal removal of gall bladder during simple cholecystectomy, Regional LN involvement on imaging studies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Early GBC ( cT1/T2) without significant lymphadenopathy or liver infiltration on radiological imaging .
  2. Locally advanced disease requiring major hepatectomy or whipple's pancreatoduodenectomy.
  3. Post cholecystectomy GBC without any evidence of spillage of residual disease on radiological imaging.
  4. Obstructive jaundice due to involvement of biliary tree by tumour.
  5. Vascular involvement such as common hepatic artery, MPV right hepatic artery or right portal vein.
  6. Any distant or isolated port site metastasis
  7. Involvement of non-regional LN (e.g . Celiac LN, SMA lymph node, inter-aortocaval or left para-ortic LN).
  8. Poor performance status 3 or more.
  9. Pregnancy.
  10. Inability or unwillingness to follow study protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
114 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    upfront surgery

    after staging workup and biopsy, patient being taken up for upfront surgical exploration will undergo staging laparoscopy followed by exploration and interaortocaval lymphnode sampling. After ruling out distant metastasis, local resectability will be reassessed and curative surgery will be performed. . Post-operative complications were recorded and graded according Clavien Dindo classification

    Procedure: curative surgery

  • Experimental
    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery

    NACT group will receive gemcitabine and platinum combination. Most common regimen comprised of gemcitabine (1000 mg/ m2 intravenously over 30-60 min) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (75 mg/ m2 intravenously over 2 h) on day 1, every 21 days. In case of renal compromise, carboplatin was used. Response was assessed using CECT abdomen and PET scan. Chemotherapy related toxicity will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5 .0.

    Drug: neoadjuvant chemotherapy · Procedure: curative surgery

Interventions

  • Drugneoadjuvant chemotherapy

    NACT group will receive gemcitabine and platinum combination. Most common regimen comprised of gemcitabine (1000 mg/ m2 intravenously over 30-60 min) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (75 mg/ m2 intravenously over 2 h) on day 1, every 21 days. In case of renal compromise, carboplatin was used. Response was assessed using CECT abdomen and PET scan. Chemotherapy related toxicity will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5 .0. PAtients will undergo curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Also known as: NACT

  • Procedurecurative surgery

    Patient being taken up for surgical exploration will undergo staging laparoscopy followed by exploration and interaortocaval lymphnode sampling. After ruling out distant metastasis, local resectability will be reassessed and curative surgery will be performed. . Post-operative complications were recorded and graded according Clavien Dindo classification

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. improvement in 3 year overall survival

    To compare the 3 year overall survival with Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery versus upfront surgery in locally advanced resectable gall bladder cancer

    Time frame: 3 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. post operative outcomes

    To compare mortality and morbidity rate in two groups

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Institutional Policy

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2028, 39 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 22, 2024
First posted
Dec 2, 2024
StartActual
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Apr 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06712420
Lead sponsor
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center, India
Responsible party
Shaifali Goel (DOCTOR, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center, India) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2025

Study contacts

Shivendra Singh, Mch
Contact
shiven_24@yahoo.co.in
+919818975024
Shaifali Goel, DrNB
Contact
doctor.shaifali@gmail.com
+918368382060
Shivendra Singh, Mch Surgical gastroenterology
study director · Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion