CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06699277Updated Nov 21, 2024

Chest Ultrasound Versus Chest X-ray with Ct As Gold Standard At Trauma Patients

An observational study in Pneumothorax At Trauma Patients, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-21.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the predictive value of the chest ultrasound in detection of pneumothorax at chest trauma patients.

The main question it aims to answer is:

How does the performance of the chest ultrasound compare to chest X-ray in predicting pneumothorax in chest trauma patients in Egypt? Participants are patients with different ages Isolated blunt chest trauma patients admitted to the emergency department during the study period.

Read the detailed description

Chest trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with timely and accurate diagnosis essential for effective treatment. While chest X-ray (CXR) has traditionally been the first-line imaging modality in emergency settings due to its availability and ease of use, it has limitations, particularly in detecting subtle or occult injuries like pneumothorax, haemothorax, rib fractures, and pulmonary contusions, especially in trauma patients positioned supine. Overuse of CXR can also lead to increased costs, radiation exposure, and emergency department overcrowding.

Ultrasound has emerged as an alternative, with multiple studies showing that chest ultrasonography (CUS) is highly sensitive and specific for detecting traumatic intrathoracic injuries, including pneumothorax. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CUS compared to CXR. While CT scans remain the gold standard for diagnosing thoracic trauma due to their superior accuracy, they expose patients to significant radiation and should be used judiciously. Although CXR is a fast and accessible option in emergencies, it may miss critical injuries, highlighting the importance of balancing diagnostic accuracy with patient safety and resource management in trauma care.

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasonography (sonar) versus chest X-ray (CXR) in the detection of thoracic injuries in patients presenting with chest trauma, using computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pneumothorax At Trauma Patients
03

In context

Pneumothorax

178 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumothorax; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 121 across 58 observational studies indexed under Pneumothorax.

Browse Pneumothorax studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Blunt chest trauma patients admitted to emergency departments in Assuit and Suez Canal University Hospitals.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with different ages.
  • both genders.
  • Patients presenting with isolated blunt chest trauma.
  • Patients who are hemodynamically stable and can undergo imaging studies (Ultrasonography, CXR, and CT).
  • Patients who provide informed consent (or proxy consent if the patient incapacitated).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamically unstable patients requiring immediate surgical intervention.
  • Patients with contraindications to CT imaging (e.g., severe renal impairment without access to alternative contrast agents).
  • Pregnant patients (due to radiation exposure from CT).
  • Patients with previous thoracic surgery or pre-existing significant thoracic abnormalities that could interfere with imaging interpretation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasonography compared to chest X-ray in the Evaluation of Chest Trauma patients.

    To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasonography (sonar) versus chest X-ray (CXR) in the detection of thoracic injuries in patients presenting with chest trauma, using computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Hour 3 after patient arrival to ER.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06699277
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Omar elmokhtar Abdelaziz khalaf Mohamed Ali (Resident, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 21, 2024

Study contacts

Omar Elmokhtar Abdelaziz Ali, MBBCH
Contact
Omar.16266404@med.aun.edu.eg
+201023236802
Shaimaa Abbas Hassan, MD
Contact
shimaa.abbas@med.aun.edu.eg
+201002953253

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion