ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06690853Updated Nov 19, 2024

Effects of Coordinative Warm-Up Exercise Protocols on the Technical and Cognitive Performance of Soccer Players

An interventional study of Experimental Coordinative training and Traditional training (control group) in Soccer Performance, sponsored by University of Molise. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-19.

Sponsored by University of Molise · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Nov 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of warm-up protocols administered to elite soccer players on technical-coordination performance and levels of cortisol, adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine, measured before and after the intervention.

Read the detailed description

The warm-up protocols included coordination exercises using different types of balls, with combined activities involving both the upper and lower limbs

02

Conditions studied

  • Soccer Performance

Keywords

  • soccer players
  • warm up
  • technical-coordination
  • cortisol
  • adrenaline
  • noradrenaline
  • dopamine
  • football
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Molise is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • elite soccer players

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no injuries in the previous 6 months;
  • no adherence to other training protocols;
  • no use of prohibited drugs and/or supplements that could affect the test results and exercises
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    experimental coordinative training

    The warm-up protocols of the Experimental Group included four types of upper and lower limb coordination exercises using different-sized balls, with intensity increasing week by week. The warm-up exercises were conducted four times per week, including game day, for a total of 12 weeks.

    Other: Experimental Coordinative training

  • Active comparator
    Traditional training (control group)

    The Control Group warm-up protocol only involved joint mobility exercises and muscle activation, as used in their regular training activities.

    Other: Traditional training (control group)

Interventions

  • OtherExperimental Coordinative training

    The warm-up protocols of the Experimental Group included four types of upper and lower limb coordination exercises using different-sized balls, with intensity increasing week by week.

  • OtherTraditional training (control group)

    The Control Group warm-up protocol only involved joint mobility exercises and muscle activation, as used in their regular training activities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Illinois agility test

    Illinois Test with the ball, aiming to achieve the best time to complete the test.

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  2. Illinois agility test

    Illinois Test without the Ball, aiming to achieve the best time to complete the test

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  3. agility test

    Planned Y Test (right and left), aiming to achieve the best time to complete the test

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  4. agility test

    Unplanned Y Test (right and left), aiming to achieve the best time to complete the test

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  5. Loughborough Soccer Shooting Test

    Right and Left Side Shooting Accuracy Test.

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  6. Blood analysis

    adrenaline

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  7. Blood analysis

    noradrenaline

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  8. Blood analysis

    cortisol

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

  9. Blood analysis

    dopamine

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Università degli Studi del Molise
    Campobasso, CB 86100, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Centorbi M, Medoro A, Modolo L, Di Claudio G, Di Martino G, Della Valle C, Buonsenso A, Marziliano N, Davinelli S, Calcagno G, di Cagno A, Fiorilli G. Reactive Training in Enhancing Technical Performance and Modulating Cortisol Biomarkers in Competitive Soccer Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2026 Jun 1;40(6):e604-e611. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005390. Epub 2026 Jan 28. PubMed 41591377 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06690853
Lead sponsor
University of Molise
Collaborators
Marco Centorbi, Alessandra di Cagno, Giuseppe Calcagno, Andrea Buonsenso
Responsible party
Giovanni Fiorilli (Principal Investigator, University of Molise) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 15, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2024
Completion
May 1, 2024
Last update
Nov 19, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion