ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06679491MENSESUpdated Nov 7, 2024

Impact of Menstrual Cycle-Based Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance in Female Athletes

An interventional study of Resistance periodized training program (N-PF) and Resistance peioridized training program (N-PL) in Menstrual Cycle, Resistance Training and Neuromuscular Function, sponsored by Universite de La Reunion. Recruiting at 1 site in Réunion. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-07.

Sponsored by Universite de La Reunion · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the impact of menstrual cycle-based resistance training on neuromuscular function in female athletes.

The primary questions it aims to answer are :

  • Does varying resistance training intensity according to menstrual phases improve maximal knee extensor strength?
  • How do different training protocols affect voluntary activation, rate of force development, muscle stiffness, and vertical jump height?

Researchers will compare natural menstrual cycle groups with an oral contraceptive control group to determine if menstrual phase-specific training influences neuromuscular adaptations.

Participants will:

  • Undergo 2 weekly resistance training sessions over 13 weeks with intensity adjustments based on menstrual phase
  • Complete periodic neuromuscular assessments across three menstrual phases: early follicular, late follicular, and mid-luteal before and after resistance training intervention
Read the detailed description

This study investigates the neuromuscular effects of menstrual cycle-based resistance training by comparing three distinct training protocols among female athletes with natural menstrual cycles and a control group of athletes using oral contraceptives. Hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual phases can impact muscle performance, recovery, and neuromuscular function. This trial aims to align training intensity with menstrual cycle phases to enhance neuromuscular adaptations.

Study Design and Population

The trial is a controlled, randomized, open-label design involving 60 recreationally active female athletes aged 18 and above. Participants are allocated into four groups:

N-PF: Natural menstrual cycle with increased training intensity during the follicular phase.

N-PL: Natural menstrual cycle with increased training intensity during the luteal phase.

N-C: Natural menstrual cycle with continuous training intensity across all phases.

OCP-C: Oral contraceptive users with continuous training intensity. Each participant completes a 13-week resistance training program tailored to her group's specific phase-aligned training protocol, with two sessions per week. To assess the neuromuscular impact, we perform pre- and post-intervention evaluations across three key menstrual phases: early follicular, late follicular, and mid-luteal.

Neuromuscular Assessments Primary outcomes include maximal knee extensor strength, assessed through isokinetic testing, and secondary measures cover neuromuscular activation, rate of force development (RFD), muscle stiffness, and vertical jump performance (CMJ). These assessments are conducted during each of the three menstrual phases pre- and post-intervention to capture phase-specific neuromuscular adaptations. Blood sampling for hormonal verification (estradiol and progesterone levels) accompanies each phase-specific testing session.

Methodology and Rationale The training intensity and volume are adjusted based on the participant's menstrual phase to leverage hormonal benefits, with estrogen levels typically promoting muscular strength in the follicular phase and progesterone affecting endurance in the luteal phase. We hypothesize that phase-specific training may yield greater improvements in strength, muscle stiffness, and overall neuromuscular efficiency.

This study's findings are expected to provide novel insights into optimizing training loads for female athletes according to hormonal cycles, with implications for improving performance, reducing injury risk, and advancing individualized training and rehabilitation protocols.

02

Conditions studied

  • Menstrual Cycle
  • Resistance Training
  • Neuromuscular Function
  • Female Athlete
  • Women Health
  • Oral Contraceptive Pill
  • Muscle Strenght
  • Hormones
  • Periodized Training

Keywords

  • Menstrual Cycle
  • Resistance training
  • Periodized training
  • neuromuscular function
  • Female athlete
  • Hormones
  • oral contraceptive pill
  • women health
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universite de La Reunion is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Female athletes with natural menstrual cycles (eumenorrheic): Participants must have regular menstrual cycles lasting between 21 and 35 days, with at least 9 cycles per year.
  • Women using a low-dose monophasic estrogen-progestin oral .
  • Age 18 or older: Participants must be legal adults.
  • (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m².
  • No medical to high-level physical training or exercise.
  • Physically active: Engages in at least 3 hours of physical activity per week.
  • : Provides written, informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Affiliation with a social security system (if applicable by local regulations).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    N-PF (Natural Cycle - Follicular Phase-Intensified Training)

    Female athletes with natural menstrual cycles who follow a resistance training program with increased intensity during the follicular phase and reduced intensity during the luteal phase. This arm aims to evaluate the impact of follicular-phase-focused training on neuromuscular performance, leveraging the potential effects of elevated estrogen levels during this phase. Intervention: Resistance Training Program: 13 weeks, 2 sessions per week, with higher intensity training scheduled during the follicular phase (early and late) and reduced intensity during the luteal phase.

    Other: Resistance periodized training program (N-PF)

  • Experimental
    N-PL (Natural Cycle - Luteal Phase-Intensified Training)

    Description: Female athletes with natural menstrual cycles who undergo a resistance training program with increased intensity during the luteal phase and reduced intensity during the follicular phase. This approach assesses the impact of training when progesterone levels are elevated. Intervention: Resistance Training Program: 13 weeks, 2 sessions per week, with higher intensity training during the luteal phase (early and late) and reduced intensity during the follicular phase.

    Other: Resistance peioridized training program (N-PL)

  • Experimental
    N-C (Natural Cycle - Continuous Training)

    Description: Female athletes with natural menstrual cycles who participate in a continuous intensity training program across all phases of the menstrual cycle. This group provides a comparison to determine the effects of a non-phase-specific training protocol on neuromuscular function. Intervention: Resistance Training Program: 13 weeks, 2 sessions per week, maintaining a consistent training intensity across both follicular and luteal phases.

    Other: Continuous resistance training program (C)

  • Active comparator
    OCP-C (Oral Contraceptive - Continuous Training, Control Group)

    Description: Female athletes using oral contraceptives, following a continuous intensity training program regardless of menstrual phase. This group serves as a control, providing insight into the neuromuscular effects of training under the hormonal conditions set by oral contraceptive use. Intervention: Resistance Training Program: 13 weeks, 2 sessions per week, with continuous intensity across all training sessions due to the stable hormonal environment induced by oral contraceptives.

    Other: Continuous resistance training program (C)

Interventions

  • OtherResistance periodized training program (N-PF)

    This intervention consists of a 13-week structured resistance training program tailored to align with the natural menstrual cycle, focusing on intensified training during the follicular phase. Participants perform two resistance training sessions per week, each lasting 90 minutes, with intensity modulated based on the participant's menstrual phase. Intensity Modulation: Follicular Phase (Days 1-14): Training sessions are performed at a higher training load during both early and late follicular phases. The increased intensity leverages higher estrogen levels, which may support greater muscle strength and recovery during this phase. Luteal Phase (Days 15-28): Training sessions are conducted at a lower training load during both early and late luteal phases to accommodate the hormonal shifts associated with elevated progesterone.

  • OtherResistance peioridized training program (N-PL)

    This intervention consists of a 13-week structured resistance training program tailored to align with the natural menstrual cycle, focusing on intensified training during the luteal phase. Participants perform two resistance training sessions per week, each lasting 90 minutes, with intensity modulated according to the participant's menstrual phase. Intensity Modulation: Follicular Phase (Days 1-14): Training sessions are conducted at a lower training load during both early and late follicular phases to accommodate the hormonal environment of this phase. Luteal Phase (Days 15-28): Training sessions are performed at a higher training load during both early and late luteal phases. The increased intensity leverages the hormonal environment associated with elevated progesterone, which may affect muscle endurance and neuromuscular adaptations during this phase.

  • OtherContinuous resistance training program (C)

    This intervention consists of a 13-week structured resistance training program with a continuous training intensity maintained throughout the menstrual cycle. Participants perform two resistance training sessions per week, each lasting 90 minutes, with a consistent training load applied across all phases. Intensity Modulation: All Phases: Training sessions are conducted at a steady training load regardless of menstrual phase. This continuous approach is designed to provide a baseline for assessing neuromuscular adaptations without the influence of phase-specific intensity adjustments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal knee extensor strenght

    Description: This outcome measure assesses the maximal isokinetic strength of the knee extensor muscles, measured as peak torque (rotational force) in Newton-meters (Nm), using an isokinetic dynamometer. Scoring and Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater strength, with no theoretical upper limit as scores are determined by the individual's maximal voluntary contraction. Typical Range: In athletic populations, peak torque values generally range from 100 to 250 Nm, but individual results may vary based on factors like muscle size and training status. Criteria for Change: An improvement in peak torque post-intervention indicates a positive neuromuscular adaptation to the training program. This measure quantifies changes in lower limb strength over time, allowing comparison of neuromuscular adaptations between menstrual phase-aligned and continuous training groups.

    Time frame: From baseline assessment prior to intervention to post-intervention at 13 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Force Development (RFD)

    Evaluates the speed at which force is generated by the knee extensor muscles. This is a key indicator of explosive strength, relevant for sports performance. Measurement: Calculated as the slope of the force-time curve from the onset of muscle contraction. Relevance: Higher RFD values suggest improved neuromuscular response and power output.

    Time frame: From baseline assessment prior to intervention to post-intervention at 13 weeks

  2. Active muscle stiffness

    Measures the active stiffness of the knee extensor muscles during before and after a fatiguing task, at 50%MVC with a shear wave elastrography (SWE) methods.

    Time frame: From baseline assessment prior to intervention to post-intervention at 13 weeks.

  3. Voluntary Muscle Activation (%AV)

    Description: Assesses the degree of maximal voluntary activation in the knee extensor muscles before, during and after an "all-out" effort. This test captures the participant's capacity to recruit motor units fully, measured using twitch interpolation technique to evaluate the difference between voluntary and stimulated muscle force output. Relevance: This measure reflects the participant's neuromuscular efficiency by indicating their ability to achieve maximal muscle activation without additional external stimulation. It provides insight into central nervous system drive and the efficiency of motor unit recruitment during intense exertion.

    Time frame: From baseline assessment prior to intervention to post-intervention at 13 weeks.

  4. Vertical Jump Height (Countermovement Jump - CMJ)

    Measures the maximal height achieved during a countermovement jump, recorded as a functional measure of lower body power. Relevance: Vertical jump height reflects overall lower limb strength and power, providing insight into functional athletic performance.

    Time frame: From baseline assessment prior to intervention to post-intervention at 13 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Laboratoire IRISSE (Université de La Réunion)
    Le Tampon, France 97430, Réunion
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2024; primary completion for Jul 2025, 8 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2024
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 7, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06679491
Lead sponsor
Universite de La Reunion
Collaborators
Physio Formation
Responsible party
Manon DAUVERGNE (PhD Candidate, Universite de La Reunion) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 7, 2024

Study contacts

Manon DAUVERGNE, PhD student
Contact
manon.dauvergne@univ-reunion.fr
+262693463288
Josué GAN, Msc.
Contact
gan.josue@gmail.com
+33680306613
Nicolas PEYROT, Professor (PU)
study director · Université du Mans
Manon DAUVERGNE, Professor (Assistant)
study director · Universite de La Reunion

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion