ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06675617EXTENSOUpdated Sep 16, 2026

EXtensive mulTilayer stEnt treatmeNt in Aortic disSectiOn

An interventional study of Allay Aortic Stent in Type B Aortic Dissection, sponsored by Intressa Vascular SA. Recruiting at 21 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Intressa Vascular SA · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial is a prospective, multicenter, open label study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of the Allay® Aortic Stent as adjunctive endovascular treatment of Type B aortic dissection in patients eligible for thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stent grafts.

Read the detailed description

Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with stent grafts is an established first-line treatment for acute complicated TBAD. In uncomplicated high-risk TBAD, TEVAR may be considered in selected patients based on patient characteristics, anatomy and clinical judgement, with uncertainty remaining regarding optimal patient selection, timing and long-term outcome. Although the benefits of TEVAR are well established in acute complicated TBAD, there remains significant risk of aneurysmal degeneration and late aortic complications associated with distal dissection left untreated, including aortic growth requiring reinterventions, or progression and/or rupture.

The present clinical investigation will enrol patients after the decision for proximal TEVAR has been made as per standard of care. The investigational procedure of adjunctive thoracic stent graft extension with the Allay® Aortic Stent will be performed after the placement of a CE-marked Thoracic Stent Graft in the descending thoracic aorta (proximal to the celiac trunk).

The study objective is to demonstrate that the Allay® Aortic Stent, used as adjunctive endovascular treatment of Type B aortic dissection in patients eligible for thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stent grafts, results in a low rate of aortic growth requiring secondary reintervention, including open conversion, or aortic rupture in the treated abdominal segment at 12 months. The study will also allow to evaluate the incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAE) following TEVAR, at 30 days post-implantation of the Allay® Aortic Stent.

Based on available data on similar devices, the objective performance goal is set to an expected proportion of 85% freedom from aortic growth requiring secondary reintervention or aortic rupture of the abdominal segment at 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type B Aortic Dissection

Keywords

  • TBAD
  • Allay
  • aortic
  • dissection
  • type B
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Intressa Vascular SA as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a type B aortic dissection extending to the celiac trunk or beyond
  • Are eligible for thoracic endovascular treatment with stent grafts as per local guidelines, and physician's decision
  • Have been elected for treatment with commercially available stent graft as per their IFU within 90 days of dissection symptoms onset

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General Exclusion Criteria:

    • Age \< 18 years
    • Pregnant, breast-feeding or planning on becoming pregnant during the entire duration of the study
    • Unable to provide written
    • Unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the study protocol
    • Taking part already in an device or drug study that could interfere with the outcomes being studied
    • Active drug addiction or known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
  • Medical Exclusion Criteria:

    • Aortic rupture (free or contained including haemothorax, increasing periaortic hematoma, or mediastinal hematoma)
    • Aortic fistula
    • Suspicion of bowel necrosis or irreversible visceral ischemia
    • Stage 5 chronic kidney disease
    • of less than 2 years due to any other medical condition than the dissection to be treated
    • Active
    • Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (including cobalt, chromium, nickel)
    • Known sensitivities or allergies to contrast materials that cannot be pre-medicated
    • Mycotic aortic aneurysm or active systemic infection that may place the patient at increased risk of endovascular infection
    • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class V (moribund patient not expected to live 24 hours with or without operation)
    • Diagnosed or suspected congenital degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's, Loeys-Dietz or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
    • Uncorrectable coagulopathy, bleeding diathesis or refusal of blood transfusion
    • Any major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular ischemic event, including myocardial infarction or stroke, or treatment of such event, within 90 days prior to enrolment
    • Any aortic-related interventional or surgical procedure within 30 days prior to enrolment
    • Any planned aortic-related interventional or surgical procedure within 30 days after the study procedure
  • Anatomical Exclusion Criteria:

    • Aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen defined as maximum transaortic diameter >55 mm in women or >60 mm in men in the thoraco-abdominal segment or >50 mm in women or >55 mm in men in the abdominal segment, measured inner-wall to inner-wall;
    • Inadequate proximal landing zone for the stent graft, such zone being \<20 mm long
    • Inadequate proximal landing zone geometry for the Allay® Aortic Stent (e.g. aortic kink)
    • Planned implantation of a stent graft with a distal diameter >38 mm or \<20 mm
    • Aorta or iliac anatomy not allowing the advancement of the delivery system
    • Subject in whom the thoracic stent graft is either 1) not implanted in its intended position and/or 2) leads to any serious device complication, and/or who has 3) persistent static obstruction of the visceral or both renal arteries, prior to Allay® Aortic Stent implantation, will not be implanted with the Allay® Aortic Stent and will be withdrawn from the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Allay Aortic Stent

    A covered thoracic stent graft is first deployed in supraceliac position as per standard of care then followed by the implantation of the Allay® Aortic Stent deployed from within the stent graft, extending below the celiac trunk to the end of the dissected aorta, typically the aortoiliac bifurcation.

    Device: Allay Aortic Stent

Interventions

  • DeviceAllay Aortic Stent

    Endovascular treatment of an aortic dissection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Freedom from aortic growth requiring secondary reintervention, including open conversion, or aortic rupture in the region treated by the Allay® Aortic Stent at 12 months

    An aortic growth requiring reintervention in the region treated with the Allay® Aortic Stent is defined as an increase in maximum aortic transverse diameter \>10mm at 12 months relative to the first post-operative CT scan done at discharge and not later than 30 days.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants with Successful Technical Performance of the Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation

    Technical success of the implantation of the Allay® Aortic Stent will be assessed at index procedure as the composite endpoint of the following: * Successful delivery to the intended implantation site and withdrawal of the delivery system; * Accurate deployment of the Allay® Aortic Stent defined as appropriate proximal landing in the stent graft and distal landing in descending aorta; * Absence of unexpected adverse effect on the stent graft, additional procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system.

    Time frame: At index procedure

  2. Incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAE) within 30 Days After Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation

    The safety endpoint will be assessed as the freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE) at 30 days, defined as the composite endpoint of the following new-onset adverse events: * Myocardial infarction; * Renal failure requiring permanent dialysis; * Bowel ischemia requiring surgical intervention; * Disabling stroke; * Paraplegia or paraparesis; * Limb ischemia; * Death.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Freedom from all-cause mortality;

    The percentage of patients alive from any cause post-discharge at follow-up intervals.

    Time frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits, at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  4. Freedom from Dissection-Related Mortality

    The percentage of patients who are alive and free from dissection-related mortality, if known.

    Time frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.

  5. Freedom from Readmission (Post-Discharge)

    The percentage of patients who have not been readmitted to the hospital post-discharge.

    Time frame: Subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.

  6. Freedom from Aorta-Related Reintervention

    The percentage of patients who have not required a reintervention related to the aorta, including details on the type and frequency if any.

    Time frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.

  7. Freedom from Open Conversion

    The percentage of patients who have not required conversion to open surgical intervention.

    Time frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.

  8. Freedom from New Ischemia

    The percentage of patients free from new ischemic events identified post-intervention.

    Time frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.

  9. Freedom from Reintervention Related to Side Branches

    The percentage of patients who have not required reintervention related to side branches.

    Time frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.

  10. Aortic rupture

    Incidence of aortic rupture observed through CT imaging post-intervention.

    Time frame: Assessed at discharge or not later than 30 days from index procedure, and then compared to pre-operative CT scan

  11. Percentage of Participants with Patent Major Aortic Branches Post-Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation

    Assessment of changes in the patency of major aortic branches post-intervention.

    Time frame: Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.

  12. Percentage of Participants with Patent Major Descending Aortic Branches Covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent

    Evaluation of changes in the patency of major descending aortic branches covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent.

    Time frame: Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.

  13. Percentage of Participants with Device Deficiencies Detected by CT Imaging Post-Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation

    Assessment of device deficiencies observed through CT imaging, including loss of patency, kink, collapse, migration, and overlap separation.

    Time frame: Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.

  14. Aortic growth

    Measurement of aortic growth over time as assessed through CT imaging.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, then compared to first post-operative CT scan done at discharge and not later than 30 days from index procedure

  15. Aortic Rupture

    Incidence of aortic rupture observed during follow-up CT imaging.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan done at discharge.

  16. New Dissection or Extension of Dissection

    Occurrence of any new dissection or extension of existing dissection observed in follow-up CT scans.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.

  17. Percentage of Participants with Fistula Formation Detected on Follow-Up CT Imaging

    Identification of fistula formation during follow-up CT imaging assessments.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.

  18. Change in True Lumen, False Lumen, and Transaortic Diameters

    Measurement of changes in the true lumen, false lumen, and transaortic diameters through follow-up CT imaging.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.

  19. Percentage of Participants with Maintained Patency in Major Aortic Branches on Follow-Up Imaging

    Evaluation of changes in the patency of major aortic branches during follow-up imaging.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.

  20. Percentage of Participants with Maintained Patency in Major Descending Aortic Branches Covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent on Follow-Up Imaging

    Observation of changes in the patency of major descending aortic branches covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.

  21. Percentage of Participants with Maintained False Lumen Perfusion and Patency in All Treated Segments on Follow-Up Imaging

    Assessment of false lumen perfusion and patency across all treated segments.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.

  22. Percentage of Participants with Device Deficiencies on Follow-Up Imaging

    Identification of device deficiencies through CT imaging, including but not limited to stent integrity, patency loss (kink, collapse), migration, separation, and endoleak Types I or III.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.

07

Study locations

16 of 21 sites recruiting
  • Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg
    Salzburg, 5020, Austria
    Not yet recruiting
  • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
    Genk, 3600, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • CHU Liège
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • Acibadem City Clinic University Hospital and Cardiovascular Center
    Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
  • CHU de Bordeaux (Hôpital Pellegrin)
    Bordeaux, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP
    Paris, 75015, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Uniklinik Düsseldorf
    Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsmedizin Frankfurt
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
    Not yet recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
    Kiel, 24105, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
    Recruiting
  • TUM Klinikum rechts der Isar
    München, 81675, Germany
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Münster
    Münster, 48149, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. A. Jurasza w Bydgoszczy
    Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Opolu
    Opole, 45-401, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Poznaniu
    Poznan, 61-848, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Kliniczny Szpital Wojewódzki Nr 2 im. Św. Jadwigi Królowej w Rzeszowie
    Rzeszów, 35-301, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny, Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
    Warsaw, 04-141, Poland
    Recruiting
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Zielonej Górze
    Zielona Góra, 65-046, Poland
    Recruiting
  • University Clinical Centre of Serbia
    Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
    Recruiting
  • Republican Research Centre of Emergency Medicine
    Tashkent, 100107, Uzbekistan
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 32 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 30, 2024
First posted
Nov 5, 2024
StartActual
Oct 30, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2031
Last update
Sep 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06675617
Lead sponsor
Intressa Vascular SA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2024
Start date
Oct 30, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Virginie Martin
Contact
virginie.martin@intressavascular.com
+3281 71 99 41
Wolf-Hans Eilenberg, MD, PhD, FEBVS
principal investigator · Medical University of Vienna

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion