CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06675045HYPOXEVARIAUpdated Aug 20, 2026

Respiratory Variability in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Placed on High Flow Oxygen Therapy

An interventional study of Respiratory variability monitoring in Acute Respiratory Insufficiency, sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Recommendations from the European Respiratory Society are to use high-flow oxygen therapy rather than conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in cases of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Studies have shown that high-flow oxygen therapy can reduce the need for intubation and the initiation of NIV without reducing mortality. In addition, by improving oxygenation, high-flow oxygen therapy can create a feeling of security which may delay endotracheal intubation.

Two studies have suggested that mortality is higher in patients receiving delayed intubation (≥ 48 hours) after failure of high flow oxygen therapy. Another study suggests that delayed endotracheal intubation after high-flow oxygen therapy ≥ 48 hours increases the risk of patient mortality independently of comorbidities and severity of illness on admission. Finally, other results suggest that the increased risk of mortality may be significant after 36 hours of high-flow oxygen therapy. It is therefore difficult to determine the right time for intubation and invasive ventilation.

A diagnostic decision aid could be of great use to the attending physician in optimising the patient's respiratory assistance strategy, whether invasive or non-invasive. Consequently, any clinical marker that can provide early detection of altered respiratory status on high-flow oxygen therapy deserves to be evaluated.

Respiratory variability is synonymous with respiratory 'good health'. A decrease in this same variabilitý is pathological and indicates an increase in the level of loads imposed on the respiratory system. It means that the measurement of respiratory variability indices may be one of these markers

There are devices for non-invasive, continuous monitoring of respiratory variability, with automated frequency analysis of thoracic movement. In this study, respiratory variability indices will be measured in patients admitted to intensive care under high-flow oxygen therapy using an external sensor called REVAMODE.

Read the detailed description

Recommendations from the European Respiratory Society are to use high-flow oxygen therapy rather than conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in cases of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Studies have shown that high-flow oxygen therapy can reduce the need for intubation and the initiation of NIV without reducing mortality. In addition, by improving oxygenation, high-flow oxygen therapy can create a feeling of security which may delay endotracheal intubation. Delaying intubation would expose the patient to respiratory effort, leading to self-inflicted lung injury by a mechanism similar to ventilation-induced lung injury. Self-inflicted lung injury may increase mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Two studies have suggested that mortality is higher in patients receiving delayed intubation (≥ 48 hours) after failure of high flow oxygen therapy. Another study suggests that delayed endotracheal intubation after high-flow oxygen therapy ≥ 48 hours increases the risk of patient mortality independently of comorbidities and severity of illness on admission. Finally, other results suggest that the increased risk of mortality may be significant after 36 hours of high-flow oxygen therapy. It is therefore difficult to determine the right time for intubation and invasive ventilation.

A diagnostic decision aid could be of great use to the attending physician in optimising the patient's respiratory assistance strategy, whether invasive or non-invasive. Consequently, any clinical marker that can provide early detection of altered respiratory status on high-flow oxygen therapy deserves to be evaluated.

Respiratory variability is synonymous with respiratory 'good health'. A decrease in this same variabilitý is pathological and indicates an increase in the level of loads imposed on the respiratory system. For this reason, this study is based on the hypothesis that the measurement of respiratory variability indices may be one of these markers.

There are devices for non-invasive, continuous monitoring of respiratory variability, with automated frequency analysis of thoracic movement. In this study, respiratory variability indices will be measured in patients admitted to intensive care under high-flow oxygen therapy using an external sensor called REVAMODE.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Insufficiency
03

In context

Lead sponsor

GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 94 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient, male or female, aged ≥ 18 years
  • Patient admitted to intensive care with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
  • Patient treated with high-flow oxygen therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient admitted to intensive care with invasive ventilation
  • Patient with therapeutic abstention for intubation
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Respiratory Variability Monitoring

    Respiratory variability will be measured using a belt equipped with an external sensor allowing automatic and continuous analysis of thoracic movement by frequency analysis

    Other: Respiratory variability monitoring

Interventions

  • OtherRespiratory variability monitoring

    Respiratory variability will be measured using a belt equipped with an external sensor allowing automatic and continuous analysis of thoracic movement by frequency analysis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Coefficient of variation

    Each respiratory cycle is defined by an inspiratory time followed by an expiratory time.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital Privé Clairval
    Marseille, 13009, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06675045
Lead sponsor
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2024
Start date
Feb 2, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Kais BEN HASSEN, MD
Contact
kais.benhassen@gmail.com
+33491171421
Kais BEN HASSEN, MD
principal investigator · Hôpital privé de Clairval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion