ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06671483Updated Oct 14, 2026

A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have Not Taken Biologic Medicines

A Phase 3 interventional study of Zasocitinib and Active Comparator in Psoriatic Arthritis, sponsored by Takeda. Recruiting at 188 sites in 20 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-14.

Sponsored by Takeda · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,088
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the joints and skin in people who have psoriasis (PsO).

The main aim of the study is to know how well zasocitinib (TAK-279) works in participants with active PsA who have not previously been treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

The participants will be treated with either zasocitinib, active comparator, or placebo. Participants will be in the study for up to 60 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psoriatic Arthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Drug Therapy
  • Latitude Research Program
  • Latitude PsA
  • Latitude PsA-3001
03

In context

Arthritis, Psoriatic

600 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Psoriatic; 129 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,088 is above the median of 145 across 336 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Psoriatic.

Browse Arthritis, Psoriatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,026 studies on the registry; 89 are open to participants now.

Of its 178 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 154 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age:

  1. The participant is aged 18 years or older at the time of signing the form (ICF). In South Korea, the age requirement for adult participants is >=19 years of age.

    Disease Characteristics:

  2. The participant has a diagnosis of PsA.
  3. The participant must have signs and symptoms of PsA for at least 3 months prior to screening.
  4. The participant meets the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR criteria).
  5. The participant has active arthritis as shown by a minimum of >=3 tender joints in TJC68 and >=3 swollen joints in SJC66 at the screening and baseline (Day 1) visits.
  6. The participant has at least 1 active lesion of plaque PsO >=2 cm in diameter, or any nail or nail bed changes characteristic of PsO.

    Medications for PsA:

  7. The participant has had at least one of the following:

    1. Inadequate response to a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (not applicable in the European Union [EU]/ European Economic Area [EEA]), OR
    2. Inadequate response to a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

PsA and PsO:

  1. The participant has other disease(s) that might confound the evaluations of benefit of zasocitinib therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Lyme disease, gout, or fibromyalgia.
  2. The participant has a concomitant comorbid skin condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study assessments, such as evidence of non-plaque PsO (erythrodermic, pustular, predominately guttate PsO, inverse, or drug-induced PsO).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,088 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Zasocitinib Dose A

    Participants will receive zasocitinib Dose A, tablets, orally, once daily (QD) for up to Week 52.

    Drug: Zasocitinib

  • Experimental
    Zasocitinib Dose B

    Participants will receive zasocitinib Dose B, tablets, orally, QD for up to Week 52.

    Drug: Zasocitinib

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator Dose C

    Participants will receive active comparator Dose C, capsules, orally, twice daily (BID) for up to Week 52.

    Drug: Active Comparator

  • Experimental
    Placebo + Zasoctinib

    Participants will receive placebo, orally, QD for up to Week 16, followed by zasoctinib Dose A or Dose B, orally, QD, from Week 16 up to Week 52.

    Drug: Zasocitinib · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Zasocitinib over-encapsulated tablets.

    Also known as: TAK- 279, NDI-034858

  • DrugActive Comparator

    Active comparator capsule.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Zasocitinib or active comparator matching placebo.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite clinical outcome assessment (COA) measure that includes both clinician-reported outcome assessments (ClinROs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). An ACR20 response is defined as: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count 66 joints (SJC66) and tender joint count 68 joints (TJC68), and \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: Patient's global assessment (PtGA) of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) pain; PtGA of PsA; physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA) of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI); high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    A PASI-75 response is defined as \>=75% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-75 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% body surface area \[BSA\]) for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo at Week 16 will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The MDA is defined as a composite outcome measure of 7 ClinROs and PROs used in PsA. Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfil 5 of 7 outcome measures: TJC68 less than or equal to (\<=) 1, SJC66 \<=1, PASI score \<=1 or body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis \<=3%, PtGA of PsA Pain score \<=15, PtGA of PsA score \<=20, HAQ-DI \<=0.5, and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) \<=1. Percentage of participants achieving MDA at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is defined as: \>= 50% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

  4. Change From Baseline in the HAQ-DI Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The HAQ-DI is defined as a 20-item PRO measure used to assess functional ability over the past week across 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. For each of these categories, participant reports the amount of difficulty they have in performing 2 or 3 specific activities on a 4-point scale (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do) The use of assistive devices and personal assistance are also noted. The HAQ-DI score is calculated as the mean of the category scores (0 = no disability, 3 = completely disabled), with 0 being the most desirable outcome and 3 as the least desirable. Participants must have scores for at least 6 categories for the HAQ-DI to be computed. Change from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  5. Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36 v2.0) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The SF-36 v2.0 is defined as a self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure general health-related quality of life (QoL). This 36-item questionnaire measures 8 domains over the past 4 weeks, including physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. Summary score PCS, will be calculated ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate better QoL. Change from baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 PCS score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The FACIT-fatigue score is defined as a 13-item PRO measure that assesses the severity of self-reported fatigue and its impact on daily functioning over the past 7 days. It includes items measuring tiredness, weakness, listlessness, lack of energy, and the effects on activities such as sleep and social interactions. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline in the FACIT- fatigue score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR70 response is defined as: \>=70% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active Comparator

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR20 response is defined as: \>= 20% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response of at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-75 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A compared to Active Comparator

    A PASI-75 response is defined as \>=75% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-75 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) for zasocitinib Dose A compared to active comparator at Week 16 will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving LEI =0 (in Participants With a Baseline LEI >=1) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The LEI is defined as a 6-item ClinRO measure specifically developed for PsA. It assesses the presence or absence of pain/tenderness when 4 kilograms per centimeter square (kg/cm\^2) of pressure is applied to 6 enthesial sites: the lateral epicondyles, medial femoral condyles, and Achilles tendon insertions on both sides of the body. Tenderness at each site is recorded on a dichotomous scale (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). The total score is the sum of tender sites, ranging from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating a greater enthesitis burden. Percentage of participants achieving LEI =0 (in participants with a baseline LEI \>=1) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline in Individual Components of ACR Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR response is defined as: improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain (0-100 visual analogue scale \[VAS\]); PtGA of PsA (0-100 VAS); PGA of PsA (0-100 VAS); participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI (0-3 scale); hsCRP. Change from baseline in individual components of ACR response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) =0 (in Participants With a Baseline LDI >=1) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The LDI is defined as a ClinRO measure use to assess the presence of dactylitis. It involves measuring the circumference of all 20 digits using a dactylometer, with measurements taken around the proximal phalanx as close to the web space as possible. Moderate pressure is applied to assess tenderness or pain in the affected digits. Tenderness is scored on a binary scale (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Only digits with a circumference ratio exceeding 10% are considered to have dactylitis. A higher score indicates worse dactylitis. Percentage of participants achieving LDI =0 (in participants with a baseline LDI \>=1) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  13. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-75 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 4 and 8 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    A PASI-75 response is defined as \>=75% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-75 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 8 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 4 and 8

  14. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-90 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    A PASI-90 response is defined as \>=90% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-90 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  15. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    A PASI-100 response is defined as \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  16. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) Simultaneously at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    ACR responses measure improvement in multiple criteria, a composite COA with ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is \>=50% improvement in SJC66 and TJC68, and 3 of 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA, HAQ-DI, hsCRP. A PASI-100 response is \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It's a ClinRO measuring psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (very marked involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 as mild, \>=3 to 15 as moderate, and \>=15 as severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) simultaneously at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With >=2-Point Decrease From Baseline (in Participants With a Baseline sPGA >=2) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    Static physician's global assessment (sPGA) is defined as a 5-point ClinRO measure used to assess the current state of psoriasis based on severity of erythema, induration, and scaling. The total sPGA score ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Each lesion characteristic (erythema, induration, and scaling) is graded separately on a 5-point scale: erythema (0 = no evidence to 4 = bright red coloration), induration (0 = no evidence to 4 = severe plaque elevation), and scaling (0 = no evidence to 4 = thick scaling). Lesion scores for erythema, induration, and scaling are averaged and rounded to nearest whole number to compute total score. Percentage of participants achieving sPGA response of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with \>=2-point decrease from baseline (in participants with a baseline sPGA \>=2) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  18. Percentage of Responders Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Differences (Reduction of >=0.35 From Baseline) in HAQ-DI Score From Baseline at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The HAQ-DI is defined as a 20-item PRO measure used to assess functional ability over the past week across 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. Each category includes 2-3 activities rated on a 4-point scale (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). Assistive devices and personal assistance are also noted. The HAQ-DI score is calculated as the mean of the category scores (0 = no disability, 3 = completely disabled), with scores of 0-1 indicating mild-to-moderate disability, 1-2 moderate-to-severe, and 2-3 severe-to-very severe disability. Participants must have scores for at least 6 categories for the HAQ-DI to be computed. Percentage of responders achieving minimal clinically important differences (reduction of \>=0.35 from baseline) in HAQ-DI score from baseline at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  19. Change From Baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The SF-36 v2.0 is defined as a self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure general health-related quality of life (QoL). This 36-item questionnaire measures 8 domains over the past 4 weeks, including physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. Summary score MCS, will be calculated ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate better QoL. Change from baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 MCS score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  20. Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 Items (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The PsAID-12 is defined as a 12-item PRO measure that assesses symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and skin problems and the impact of PsA on the participant's life over the past week. It covers areas including work and/or leisure activities, physical activities, sleep, anxiety, embarrassment or shame, social participation, and depression. The response options are rated on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none/no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), with higher scores indicating a greater impact of the disease. Change from baseline in PsAID-12 total score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  21. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The DAPSA is defined as a composite measure of peripheral joint disease activity that includes ClinROs, PROs, and a laboratory test. DAPSA is calculated as the sum of the following components: tender joint count (0-68), swollen joint count (0-66), hsCRP level (milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]), PtGA of PsA pain (0-100 VAS), and PtGA of PsA (0-100 VAS). DAPSA cutoffs for disease activity are: remission (\<=4), low disease activity (\>4 to \<=14), moderate disease activity (\>14 to \<=28), and high disease activity (\>28). Change from baseline in DAPSA score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  22. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) (C-Reactive Protein) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The DAS28 with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein is defined as a derived index combining the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), hsCRP, and PtGA of PsA. The 28-joint count includes the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) 1-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) 1-5 of both upper extremities, and the knee joints of both lower extremities. The DAS28 score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Change from baseline in DAS28 C-reactive protein score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  23. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Fingernail Psoriasis (PGA-F) Score in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement (PGA-F Greater than [>] 0) From Baseline at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The PGA-F is defined as a ClinRO measure assessing the severity of fingernail PsO. It evaluates nail bed signs (onycholysis, hyperkeratosis, erythema, splinter hemorrhages) and nail matrix signs (pitting, ridging, discoloration). Clinicians rate the severity using categories: clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4). The total score is based on the area with the most involvement (nail bed or matrix), ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (very severe), with higher scores indicating more severe fingernail PsO. Change from baseline in PGA-F score in participants with PGA-F \>0 from baseline at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  24. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesis Index = 0 through Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    The SPARCC Enthesis Index is a ClinRO measure that assesses the presence or absence of pain/tenderness when 4 kg/cm\^2 of pressure is applied to 18 enthesial sites across the following 9 bilateral sites: Achilles tendons, plantar fascia insertion at the calcaneus, greater tuberosity of the humerus, medial epicondyles, lateral epicondyles, greater trochanter, quadriceps insertion, inferior patella, and tibial tuberosity. Tenderness at each site is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0). Total score is the sum of score from each site, ranging from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater enthesis burden. Percentage of participants achieving SPARCC Enthesis Index = 0 through Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  25. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 8 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR20 response is defined as: \>= 20% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response at Week 8 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 8

  26. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active Comparator

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is defined as: \>= 50% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

  27. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active Comparator

    ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR70 response is defined as: \>=70% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

  28. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-90 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active Comparator

    A PASI-90 response is defined as \>=90% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-90 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  29. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active Comparator

    A PASI-100 response is defined as \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  30. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) Simultaneously at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active Comparator

    ACR responses measure improvement in multiple criteria, a composite COA with ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is \>=50% improvement in SJC66 and TJC68, and 3 of 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA, HAQ-DI, hsCRP. A PASI-100 response is \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It's a ClinRO measuring psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (very marked involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 as mild, \>=3 to 15 as moderate, and \>=15 as severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) simultaneously at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

  31. Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active Comparator

    The MDA is defined as a composite outcome measure of 7 ClinROs and PROs used in PsA. Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfil 5 of 7 outcome measures: TJC68 less than or equal to (\<=) 1, SJC66 \<=1, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score \<=1 or body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis \<=3%, PtGA of PsA Pain score \<=15, PtGA of PsA score \<=20, HAQ-DI \<=0.5, and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) \<=1. Percentage of participants achieving MDA at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

    Time frame: At Week 16

07

Study locations

177 of 188 sites recruiting
  • AARR- Chandler AZ
    Chandler, Arizona 85225, United States
    Recruiting
  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC | Phoenix, AZ
    Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
    Recruiting
  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC | Phoenix, AZ
    Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
    Recruiting
  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC | Phoenix, AZ
    Phoenix, Arizona 85306, United States
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • First OC Dermatology Research Inc.
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
    Recruiting
  • Purushotham & Akther Kotha MD
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
    Recruiting
  • Triwest Research Associates LLC
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
    Recruiting
  • The Cohen Medical Centers
    Thousand Oaks, California 91360-3967, United States
    Recruiting
  • Foothill Arthritis Clinic
    Tujunga, California 91042, United States
    Recruiting
  • Medvin Clinical Research
    Whittier, California 90602-1005, United States
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Denver Arthritis Clinic | Denver, CO
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
    Recruiting
  • Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties (AARDS)
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactdrnbg@rheum.com · 305-652-6676
    • Norman Gaylis · Principal investigator
  • RASF- Clinical Research Center
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486-1390, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactsbb61@aol.com · 5651-361-6547
    • Shawn Baca · Principal investigator
  • Clinical Research of West Florida | Clearwater, FL
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactrlevin@crwf.com · 727-466-0078
    • Robert Levin · Principal investigator
  • GNP Research, LLC | Hollywood, FL
    Cooper City, Florida 33024, United States
    Recruiting
  • Driven Research LLC
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134-3901, United States
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Tectum Medical Research
    Davie, Florida 33024, United States
    Recruiting
  • Sweet Hope Research Specialty, Inc, d/b/a Neoclinical Research
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactcsesin1979@aol.com · 305-456-9062
    • Carlos Sesin · Principal investigator
  • Bioresearch Partners
    Miami, Florida 33143, United States
    Recruiting
  • HMD Research LLC
    Orlando, Florida 32819, United States
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Millennium Research | Ormond Beach, FL
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactdrkohen1@gmail.com · 386-672-1985
    • Michael Kohen · Principal investigator
  • IRIS Research and Development | Plantation, FL
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
    Recruiting
  • Sarasota Arthritis Research Center
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
    Recruiting
  • West Broward Rheumatology Associates, Inc.
    Tamarac, Florida 33321, United States
    Recruiting
  • Clinical Research of West Florida | Tampa, FL
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactjcarter@crwf.com · 813-870-1292
    • John Carter · Principal investigator
  • Marietta Rheumatology Associates
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
    Recruiting
  • GSCP/CIS
    Orland Park, Illinois 60467, United States
    Recruiting
  • Greater Chicago Specialty Physicians LLC/CIS
    Schaumburg, Illinois 60195, United States
    Recruiting
  • Accurate Clinical Research, Inc. | Lake Charles
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70605, United States
    Recruiting
  • Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
    Hagerstown, Maryland 21740, United States
    Recruiting
  • Henry Ford Health System-Rheumatology Department
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    Withdrawn

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Michigan Rheumatology Group, P.C. - Grand Blanc Office
    Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439-2451, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactakarrar@aamrc.net · 810-694-0082
    • Ali Karrar · Principal investigator
  • Ash Research Clinic - Howell
    Howell, Michigan 48843, United States
    Recruiting
  • June DO, PC Private Practice - Dr. Justus Fiechtner
    Lansing, Michigan 48911-4285, United States
    Recruiting
  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan
    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan 48081, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactasulich@msn.com · 586-598-3329
    • Andrew Sulich · Principal investigator
  • Saint Louis Rheumatology
    St Louis, Missouri 63119, United States
    Recruiting
  • Albuquerque Center for Rheumatology PC
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102-1710, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactleroyp@abqrheum.net · 505-242-6190
    • Leroy Pacheco · Principal investigator
  • Santa Fe Rheumatology
    Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505-1102, United States
    Recruiting
  • NYU Langone Health | Joseph S. and Diane H. Steinberg Ambulatory Care Center - Rheumatology Department
    Brooklyn, New York 11201, United States
    Recruiting
  • Accellacare of Hickory
    Hickory, North Carolina 28602, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactrdc3s@yahoo.com · 828-345-5060
    • Ronald Caldwell · Principal investigator
  • University Hospitals | UH Cleveland Medical Center - Department of Medicine - Rheumatology Division
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
    Recruiting
  • Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactidiabmd@gmail.com · 440-826-0742
    • Isam Diab · Principal investigator
  • PA Regional Center for Arthritis and Osteoporosis Research
    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610-3206, United States
    Recruiting
  • West Tennessee Research Institute
    Jackson, Tennessee 38305, United States
    Recruiting
  • Accurate Clinical Research
    Baytown, Texas 77521, United States
    Recruiting
  • Novel Research | Bellaire Location
    Bellaire, Texas 77024, United States
    Recruiting
  • Novel Research | Bellaire Location
    Bellaire, Texas 77024, United States
    Recruiting
  • Accurate Clinical Research
    Houston, Texas 77089, United States
    Recruiting
  • Introscience Research | Northwest Houston Arthritis Center - Houston, TX
    Houston, Texas 77090, United States
    Recruiting
  • West Texas Clinical Research
    Lubbock, Texas 79424, United States
    Recruiting
  • Southwest Rheumatology Research, LLC | Mesquite, TX
    Mesquite, Texas 75150, United States
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactasinghal@swrr.net · 972-288-2600
    • Atul Singhal · Principal investigator
  • Clinical Investigations of Texas
    Plano, Texas 75075, United States
    Recruiting
  • Arthritis Northwest, PLLC | Spokane, WA
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
    Recruiting
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
    Anderlecht, Brussels Capital 1070, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Ghent
    Ghent, Flanders 9000, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • ReumaClinic Genk
    Genk, Limburg 3600, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • St Pierre Brussels
    Brussels, 1000, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Liege - Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • Diagnostic Consultative Centre - Focus-5 - LZIP EOOD
    Sofia, Sofia-Grad 1463, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
  • Military Medical Academy Multiprofile Hospital for Not Yet Recruiting Treatment - Sofia
    Sofia, Sofia-Grad 1606, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactoparanov@abv.bg · 359888985531
    • Boycho Oparanov · Principal investigator
  • Centre of Rheumatology St. Irina
    Sofia, Sofia-Grad 1784, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactrodina_usd@abv.bg · 359888813435
    • Rodina Licheva · Principal investigator
  • Medical Center Medconsult Pleven OOD
    Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
  • AES Partner Site -Plovdiv
    Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
  • Medical Center Artmed OOD | Plovdiv, Bulgaria
    Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
  • Diagnostic- Consultative Center- 1- Ruse EOOD
    Rousse, 7002, Bulgaria
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Dr Stoyanka Vladeva IPSMP VBR | Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
    Stara Zagora, 6000, Bulgaria
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Medical Center Zara-Med EOOD
    Stara Zagora, 6000, Bulgaria
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contacthr_vassilev@abv.bg · 359882887889
    • Hristo Vasilev · Principal investigator
  • El Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos (CER)
    Providencia, Santiago Metropolitan 7500000, Chile
    Recruiting
  • Clinica Dermacross S.A.
    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan 7640881, Chile
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactccruzf@gmail.com · 56229540251
    • Claudia Paz De La Cruz Fernandez · Principal investigator
  • Centro de Estudios Clinicos
    Santiago, 8320000, Chile
    Recruiting
  • CTR Estudios
    Santiago, 8320000, Chile
    Recruiting
  • Centro Internacional de Estudios Clínicos
    Santiago, 8420383, Chile
    Recruiting
  • Medicinski Centar Kuna and Peric
    Zagreb, City of Zagreb 10000, Croatia
    Recruiting
  • Clinical Hospital Centre Osijek
    Osijek, 31000, Croatia
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactjmilasahic@gmail.com · 385989801142
    • Jasminka Milas-Ahic · Principal investigator
  • Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka
    Rijeka, 51000, Croatia
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Centre Split
    Split, 21000, Croatia
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactmislavradic@gmail.com · +385 91 611 2270
    • Mislav Radic · Principal investigator
  • General Hospital Zadar
    Zadar, 23000, Croatia
    Completed

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Revmatologie s.r.o. | Brno, Czech Republic
    Brno, Czech Rep 63800, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • L.K.N. Arthrocentrum, s.r.o. - Revmatologicka
    Hlučín, Czech Rep 92307, Czechia
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site — choose another above.

  • Clintrial s.r.o. | Prague, Czech Republic
    Prague, Czech Rep 100 00, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • Praglandia | Prague, Czech Republic
    Prague, Czech Rep 150 00, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • MEDICAL Plus s.r.o.
    Uherské Hradiště, Czech Rep 68601, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • CCR Ostrava
    Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region 702 00, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • Pv Medical Services
    Zlín, NAP 760 01, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • Revmatologicky ustav | Clinical Evaluation Department
    Prague, Prague 12800, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactzavada@revma.cz
    • Jakub Zavada · Principal investigator
  • Pratia Pardubice a.s.
    Pardubice, 53002, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactmaca.svobodova@post.cz · 00420606298371
    • Marcela Svobodova · Principal investigator
  • Innomedica OU | Tallinn, Estonia
    Tallinn, Harju 10117, Estonia
    Recruiting
  • Center for Clinical and Basic Research
    Tallinn, Harju 10128, Estonia
    Recruiting
  • Clinical Research Centre | Tartu, Estonia
    Tartu, Tartu 50106, Estonia
    Recruiting
  • North Estonia Medical Centre | Mustamae Building - Internal Medicine Clinic - Rheumatology Department
    Tallinn, 13419, Estonia
    Recruiting
  • MediTrials OÜ
    Tartu, 50708, Estonia
    Recruiting
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
    Bad Bentheim, Lower Saxony 48455, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Rheumzentrum Prof.Dr.med.Gunther Neeck
    Bad Doberan, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 18209, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Rheumazentrum Ratingen-Studienambulanz
    Ratingen, North Rhine-Westphalia 40878, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactstudien@rhzr.de · 4921025533788
    • Siegfried Wassenberg · Principal investigator
  • Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR
    Leipzig, Saxony 4103, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis | Berlin, Germany
    Berlin, 12161, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Städtisches Klinikum Dresden
    Dresden, 01067, Germany
    Recruiting
  • MVZ Rheumatologie und Autoimmunmedizin Hamburg GmbH - Hamburg
    Hamburg, 20095, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contacteverding@hotmail.de · 49(0)43-31-33-76-60
    • Andrea Everding · Principal investigator
  • Medicover MVZ München Ost
    München, 81667, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Porcika Klinika
    Hódmezővásárhely, Csongrad-Csanad 6800, Hungary
    Recruiting
    • Site Contact · Contactjimbies@gmail.hu · 36203265302
    • Eva Balazs · Principal investigator

Showing the first 100 of 188 sites across 20 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Access criteria: IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Secondary outcomes
3 edited, 2 removed, 1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
  • EditedChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36 v2.0) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
  • EditedChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
  • RemovedChange From Baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 PCS Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
  • RemovedChange From Baseline in the FACIT- Fatigue Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
  • DescriptionPercentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 14, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 14, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 3 edited, 2 removed, 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
    • EditedChange From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36 v2.0) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
    • EditedChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
    • RemovedChange From Baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 PCS Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
    • RemovedChange From Baseline in the FACIT- Fatigue Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose B Compared to PlaceboTime frame: Baseline, at Week 16
    • DescriptionPercentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Placebo: how it is measured was reworded
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06671483
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2024
Start date
Mar 3, 2025
Primary completion
May 18, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 28, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 14, 2026

Study contacts

Takeda Contact
Contact
medinfoUS@takeda.com
+1-877-825-3327
Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Zasocitinib

Start the discussion