An interventional study of Family voice and Nature sound in Chest Pain, Anxiety and Sleep, sponsored by Damanhour University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-22.
Sponsored by Damanhour University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
This study will be used to compare the effects of two auditory stimulation methods on improving vital signs parameters, reducing the severity of chest pain, and improving the sleep quality of cardiac patients.
This study aims to To evaluate the relative efficacy of two auditory stimulation techniques in enhancing cardiac patients' vital sign assessments.
This research made use of two different therapies including audio stimulation. Group A used familiar auditory stimulus, which was a spoken message, and group B used sounds of nature.
Patients with preexisting cardiac conditions who were admitted to a predetermined critical care unit and who subsequently intended to have percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI)
381 studies on the registry are indexed under Chest Pain; 66 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 80 is below the median of 143 across 201 interventional studies indexed under Chest Pain.
Browse Chest Pain studies →Damanhour University is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The patient receives family voice from significant member
Other: Family voice
Patient receives nature sounds such as waves sound, river streams, waterfalls, and walking in the forest
Other: Nature sound
Group A receives the family voice
Group B receives the nature sound.
sleep quality
sleep quality used Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). it consisted of five items score from zero mean poor pattern and 100 mean good
Time frame: three days after intervention
severity of chest pain
Visual analogue scale consisted of score from 0 to 10 zero mean no pain and 10 mean high pain
Time frame: three days after intervention
level of anxiety and depression
The hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire consisted of 14 questions 7 for anxiety and 7 for depression score score 0-7 mean normal; score 8-10 mean mild; score 11-15, mean moderate; and score 16-21, mean severely
Time frame: three days after intervention
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Damanhour University