ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06667141Updated Sep 23, 2026

Study of ACR-2316 in Specific Advanced Solid Tumors

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of ACR-2316 in Specific Advanced Solid Tumors, sponsored by Acrivon Therapeutics. Recruiting at 15 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Recurrence)No conditionIs this wrong?Recurrence describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by Acrivon Therapeutics · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a first in-human, Open-label Phase 1/2 study to assess the safety and activity of ACR-2316 for the treatment of subjects with specific, histologically confirmed, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic solid tumors.

Read the detailed description

The Phase 1/2 monotherapy clinical trial for ACR-2316 is designed to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary evaluation of anti-tumor activity of ACR-2316. Additional objectives include the determination of the maximal tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 monotherapy dose, characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacogenomics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Specific Advanced Solid Tumors

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ACR-2316
  • WEE1
  • PKMYT1
  • Locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic solid tumors
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Acrivon Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed written .
  2. or cytologically proven , recurrent or locally advanced selected solid tumors.
  3. Must be willing to provide redacted pathology report and next-generation sequencing (NGS) reports.
  4. Subjects should have received no more than 3 for recurrent disease.
  5. (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1 at trial entry and an estimated of at least 3 months.
  6. Disease must be measurable with at least 1 unidimensional by v1.1.
  7. Adequate organ functions.
  8. Must have progressed after prior line of treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria (all participants):

  1. Participants with known symptomatic .
  2. Participant had systemic therapy within 3 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug.
  3. Participant had radiation therapy for curative intent within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug.
  4. Participant had palliative radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug.
  5. Women who are pregnant or lactating.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dose escalation

    ACR-2316 will be administered using a 3-week or a 4-week schedule.

    Drug: ACR-2316

  • Experimental
    Dose expansion

    ACR-2316 will be administered using a 3-week schedule.

    Drug: ACR-2316

Interventions

  • DrugACR-2316

    ACR-2316 is an experimental drug

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose Escalation

    To determine the MTD of ACR-2316.

    Time frame: Number of DLT events during the DLT observation period (up to 28 days)

  2. Dose Expansion

    To determine the RP2D of ACR-2316, safety and preliminary evaluation of anti-tumor activity

    Time frame: RP2D supported by safety, PK and PD data through study completion

  3. Dose Expansion

    To assess the safety and tolerability of ACR-2316

    Time frame: Incidence and grades of TEAEs and TRAEs per NCI CTCAE v.5.0 and number of dose decreases, number of dose delays, and SAEs through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  4. Dose Expansion

    To determine preliminary anti-tumor activity of ACR-2316.

    Time frame: Confirmed ORR per Recist v1.1 and DOR, CBR, assessed every 6 weeks from baseline thorough study completion, an average 1 year or until death.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dose Escalation

    To assess the safety and tolerability of ACR-2316. Safety will be assessed by the incidence of AEs characterized overall and by type, incidence, severity graded according to NCI CTCAE v5.0, seriousness, and relationship to study treatment.

    Time frame: This will be evaluated through study completion

  2. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  3. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: minimum plasma drug concentration (Cmin).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  4. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: time to maximum plasma drug concentration (tmax).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  5. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: time of last quantifiable plasma drug concentration (tlast).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  6. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  7. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: plasma drug concentration at 24 hours post-dose (C24).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  8. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  9. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: terminal elimination half-life (t½).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  10. Dose Escalation

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: apparent oral clearance (CL/F).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is up to 28 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  11. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  12. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: minimum plasma drug concentration (Cmin).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  13. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: time to maximum plasma drug concentration (tmax).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  14. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: time of last quantifiable plasma drug concentration (tlast).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  15. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  16. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: plasma drug concentration at 24 hours post-dose (C24).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  17. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  18. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: terminal elimination half-life (t½).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

  19. Dose Expansion

    To assess Pharmacokinetics: apparent oral clearance (CL/F).

    Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing in Cycle 1, 2 & 3 (each cycle is 21 days). Predose and multiple time points after dose up to Cycle 3.

07

Study locations

15 of 15 sites recruiting
  • HonorHealth Research Institute
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
    Recruiting
    • Amy Petersburg · Contact
    • Lyndsay Willmott, MD · Principal investigator
  • Precision NextGen Oncology & Research Center
    Beverly Hills, California 90212, United States
    Recruiting
    • Francisco Capilla · Contact
    • Kamlesh K Sankhala, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
    Recruiting
    • Ariel Klingfus · Contact
    • Monica Mita, MD · Principal investigator
  • Denver Health One
    Denver, Colorado 80218, United States
    Recruiting
    • Rachel Morgan · Contact
    • Gerald Falchook, MD · Principal investigator
  • Florida Cancer Specialist
    Sarasota, Florida 34232, United States
    Recruiting
    • Mallory Hawkins · Contact
    • Judy S Wang, MD · Principal investigator
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
    • Victoria Weden · Contact
    • Gerburg Wulf, MD · Principal investigator
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
    Recruiting
    • Fatima Darwiche · Contact
    • Zhen Ni Zhou, MD · Principal investigator
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Buffalo, New York 14203, United States
    Recruiting
    • Paige Wierzbicki · Contact
    • Anuradha Krishnamurthy, MD · Principal investigator
  • Montefiore Medical Centre
    The Bronx, New York 10461, United States
    Recruiting
    • Sene Martin · Contact
    • Nicole Nevadunsky, MD · Principal investigator
  • Carolina BioOncology Institute
    Huntersville, North Carolina 28078, United States
    Recruiting
    • Hannah Wall · Contact
    • Neel Gandhi, MD · Principal investigator
  • Rhode Island Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
    Recruiting
    • Megan Faria · Contact
    • Benedito Carneiro, MD · Principal investigator
  • Tennessee Oncology
    Franklin, Tennessee 37067, United States
    Recruiting
    • Catt Pecknold · Contact
    • Jeff Russell, MD · Principal investigator
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77054, United States
    Recruiting
    • CR Registration Team Office of Clinical Research · Contact
    • Timothy A Yap, MD,PhD · Principal investigator
  • NEXT Oncology
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
    Recruiting
    • Jordan Georg · Contact
    • David Sommerhalder, MD · Principal investigator
  • Next Virginia
    Fairfax, Virginia 22031, United States
    Recruiting
    • Blake Patterson · Contact
    • Mohamad Salkeni, MD · Principal investigator
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06667141
Lead sponsor
Acrivon Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 31, 2024
Start date
Oct 8, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 12, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 12, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Mansoor R Mirza, MD
Contact
ACR-2316ClinicalTrial@acrivon.com
617-207-8979
Tiffany Crowell
Contact
ACR-2316ClinicalTrial@acrivon.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion