ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06651203KISS01Updated Oct 21, 2024

Evaluation of the KIR3DL2 Marker in Flow Cytometry for Sézary Syndrome Diagnosis, Therapeutic Response and Residual Disease: a Prospective and Multicenter Study

An observational study in Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome and Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-21.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a group of primary cutaneous lymphomas including Mycosis Fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). SS is characterized by erythroderma and high numbers of circulating atypical lymphocytes (Sézary cells. SCs). Blood staging was added to the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) classification of MF/SS, reflecting the broad spectrum of CTCLs and the poor prognosis related to blood involvement. Blood classes were defined using blood-smear manual counts. However, this method never reached an international consensus status because of its subjective nature and its poor sensitivity. Several markers have been identified with variable efficiency for MF/SS diagnosis, outcome prediction and blood response to treatment. Such markers are essential for sharing and publishing consistent data about diagnosis, staging, prognosis and response to therapies. The detection of SCs is based on the lack of pan T-cell markers such as CD7 and/or CD26, which is not constant and may be observed in benign dermatoses. Thus, patients are often diagnosed with a delay, even treated with inappropriate therapies which worsens their prognosis. The relevance of blood-class in MF/SS is not only related to stage but also contributes to the response to therapy in clinical trials. We found that a significant proportion of benign T-cells from SS patients are CD4+CD26-, which may underestimate the rate of complete response to treatment. The identification of KIR3DL2 on SCs by our team has greatly helped the detailed study of the malignant clone. We have recently published two ancillary studies demonstrating the specificity and reliability of KIR3DL2 as a positive marker for SCs, and its prognosis value at initial diagnosis. We have designed an optimized flow-cytometry strategy as part of the routine care of erythrodermic patients at Saint-Louis Hospital and published in 2019 the results of a 5 years prospective single-center study involving 254 CTCL patients at initial diagnosis. We provided recommendations with the use a threshold value of KIR3DL2+SCs ≥ 200/µL or KIR3DL2+SCs/lymphocytes ≥ 10% in the diagnostic criteria and proposed a novel algorithm blood staging.

Several innovative immunotherapies in phase I/II trials or under compassionate use are ongoing in French centers, with the need to assess blood response using positive markers. Our goal is to validate KIR3DL2 as a specific marker for SS and to assess its reliability for blood staging and response to treatment in a multicenter study (11 centers).

02

Conditions studied

  • Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome
  • Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma
03

In context

Mycosis Fungoides

447 studies on the registry are indexed under Mycosis Fungoides; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 460 is above the median of 100 across 51 observational studies indexed under Mycosis Fungoides.

Browse Mycosis Fungoides studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,596 studies on the registry; 1,037 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  1. Patients with clinical features consistent with erythrodermic CTCL upon initial diagnosis assessment
  2. Patients previously diagnosed with SS and followed at Saint-Louis hospital

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria for all patient :

  • Age ≥ 18
  • Patients with health insurance
  • Patients informed and not opposed to the study

Inclusion criteria for group 1 :

  • Patients with clinical features consistent with erythrodermic CTCL at initial diagnosis.

Inclusion criteria for group 2 :

  • Confirmed SS (previously diagnosed), followed at Saint Louis hospital participating center with all the following criteria:

    1. Stage T4 erythroderma (stage (erythrodermia ≥ 80% of total body area)
    2. The presence of an identical T-cell clone evidenced in blood and skin
    3. B2 blood staging at initial diagnosis

      Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other progressive neoplastic disease
  • Progressive psychotic disease
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patients with state medical aid
  • Refusal to participate
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with clinical features consistent with erythrodermic cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL)

    at initial diagnosis assessment

    Other: Follow-up

  • Patients previously diagnosed with Sézary syndrome (SS) and followed at Saint-Louis hospital

Interventions

  • OtherFollow-up

    Clinical evaluation Blood sample Skin biopsy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Specificity of KIR3DL2 in the diagnosis of Sezary syndrome

    Defined as the proportion of patients KIR3DL2 \<200/mm3 among patients without SS. Diagnosis of SS is defined as the presence of each of the following criteria: * T4 tumoral stage (erythrodermia ≥ 80% of total body area) * the presence of an identical T-cell clone evidenced in blood and skin * B2 blood stage Of note, according to ISCL/EORTC recommendations, FCM (Flow cytometry) blood staging is defined as: Stage B2: Expanded CD4+T cells with either CD4+CD26-≥30%, or CD4+CD7-≥40% And/or either CD4+CD7- or CD4+CD26-Tcells≥1000/mm3 Stage B1: Either CD4+CD7- or CD4+CD26-T-cells ≥250/mm3, but not meeting B2 criteria Stage B0: CD4+CD7- and CD4+CD26-T-cells\<250/mm3 Diagnosis and KIR3DL2 measurements will be performed using standardized/harmonized procedures across participating laboratories, using the same combination of labelled antibodies, gating strategies and instrument settings.

    Time frame: At baseline, for group 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve (Sensitivity, Specificity, area under the ROC curve) of KIR3DL2 in the diagnosis of SS and mycosis fungoides (MF) in eligible patients.

    The reference diagnosis of SS will be defined as in the primary endpoint. KIR3DL2 will be measured with by FCM. Sensitivity, Specificity and ROC curve will be estimated both with the absolute count of KIR3DL2 and with the percentage of KIR3DL2 within lymphocyte subset.

    Time frame: At baseline, for group 1

  2. Positive and Negative predictive values of KIR3DL2 for SS diagnosis in the population of patients with clinical features consistent with erythrodermic CTCL

    Cut-off value used for KIR3DL2 : 200/mm3

    Time frame: Up to 24 months for group 1 patients

  3. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 3 months for group 1 and 2

  4. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 6 months for group 1 and 2

  5. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 9 months for group 1 and 2

  6. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 12 months for group 1 and 2

  7. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 15 months for group 1 and 2

  8. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 18 months for group 1 and 2

  9. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 21 months for group 1 and 2

  10. Blood response

    Blood response using FCM and CD7 and CD26 markers as per latest ISCL and EORTC guidelines, with the definition of: Complete response (CR) : B0 stage. Partial response (PR) : \> 50% decrease in quantitative measurements of blood tumor burden from baseline in those with B2 stage at baseline. Progressive disease (PD) : B0 to B2 or \>50% increase from baseline and at least 5000 neoplastic cells/ mm3 or Loss of response: in those with PR who were originally B2 at baseline, \> 50% increase from nadir. Stable disease (SD) : Fails to attain criteria for CR, PR, or PD. Relapse : increase of neoplastic blood lymphocytes to ≥ B2 in those with CR.

    Time frame: At 24 months for group 1 and 2

  11. Overall survival

    Time frame: Up to 24 months for group 1

  12. Progression free survival

    Time frame: Up to 24 months for group 1

  13. Minimal Residual Disease

    Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometric immunophenotyping and High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) based detection of clonal TCR gene rearrangements in patients with SS, at the time of CR remission, in comparison with baseline measurements on frozen PBMC.

    Time frame: At 24 months for group 1 and 2

  14. Evolution to SS diagnosis as defined in the primary endpoint in stage B1 patients with KIR3DL2≥ 200/mm3 or ≥ 10% at baseline

    Time frame: Up to 24 months for group 1

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2024; primary completion for Nov 2027, 36 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2024
First posted
Oct 21, 2024
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2029
Last update
Oct 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06651203
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2024

Study contacts

Hélène Moins, MD PhD
Contact
helene.moins@u-paris.fr
142499629 ext. +33
Jérôme Lambert, MD PhD
Contact
jerome.lambert@u-paris.fr
142499742 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion