CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06637670Updated Oct 15, 2024

Kinesiological Taping in Individuals with Meniscus Injury

An interventional study of Kinesiology taping and Placebo taping in Meniscus Tears, sponsored by Amasya University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by Amasya University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2022, registered Oct 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to explore how kinesiology taping affects people with mild to moderate meniscus injuries (grades I/II), focusing on pain, movement fears, muscle strength, balance, joint movement, and quality of life.

Two groups will be involved: one will receive kinesiology taping on the thigh muscle with some tension, while the other will receive a placebo tape with no tension. Researchers will measure various factors, including pain and muscle strength, both before and 48-72 hours after taping.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to understand the short-term (acute) effects of kinesiology taping on people with mild to moderate meniscus injuries (grade I/II). These injuries, affecting the cartilage in the knee, can cause pain, reduced mobility, and fear of movement. Kinesiology taping, a popular therapy, involves applying elastic tape to support muscles and joints. This research looked at whether taping could improve pain, muscle strength, movement, balance, and quality of life in patients with these knee injuries.

Study Design The study will use a randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded design, meaning that patients were randomly assigned to two groups, and neither the patients nor the researchers knew which group each person was in during the treatment.

Experimental Group: will receive kinesiology taping on the quadriceps muscle (the large muscle at the front of the thigh) using a 'Y-shaped' technique with moderate tension (25-50% stretch).

Control Group: will receive a placebo tape applied without tension and placed in a different direction.

Measurements

To evaluate the effects of taping, several aspects will be measured both before the tape was applied and 48-72 hours later:

Pain levels Fear of movement (kinesiophobia) Muscle strength (ability to extend the knee) Proprioception (awareness of limb position and force applied) Joint range of motion (how much the knee can bend and straighten) Joint position sense (accuracy in detecting knee position with eyes closed) Quality of life, using a questionnaire (SF-36) that assesses various aspects like physical function and energy levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meniscus Tears

Keywords

  • kinesiology taping
  • pain
  • quality of life
  • meniscus injury
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Amasya University is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with meniscus grade I/II,
  • Who agreed to participate in the study
  • Signed the voluntary consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant individuals
  • Individuals with additional knee injuries (e.g., ligament tears) or chronic conditions affecting the knee (e.g., arthritis).
  • Patients with grade III meniscus tears or more severe injuries.
  • Who had knee surgery in the last 6 months.
  • Patients with skin conditions or allergies to adhesive materials or kinesiology tape.
  • Individuals with neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The experimental group

    This group was applied 'Y shaped' kinesiology taping on quadriceps femoris muscle, based on facilitation technique with 25-50% stretching.

    Other: Kinesiology taping

  • Placebo comparator
    The placebo group

    This group was applied a tape without tension, perpendicular to the quadriceps femoris muscle

    Other: Placebo taping

Interventions

  • OtherKinesiology taping

    'Y shaped' kinesiology taping was applied on quadriceps femoris muscle, based on facilitation technique with 25-50% stretching.

  • OtherPlacebo taping

    A tape without tension was applied perpendicular on the quadriceps femoris muscle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain

    Pain assessment was made with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The patient was asked to mark where his or her pain was on the scale by writing "0: No pain, 10: Unbearable pain" at the two ends of the 10-centimeter scale.

    Time frame: Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  2. Knee extension muscle strength

    A hand dynamometer (MicroFet 2 HHD) was used to measure the patients' knee extension muscle strength. Measurements were recorded in kilograms. For measurement, the patient was positioned without support, with his legs hanging off the bed from the knees, knees flexed at 90°, feet free and arms crossed over the shoulders. During the measurement, the thigh to be measured was stabilized with one hand after the patients completed maximum knee extension.

    Time frame: Baseline and 48 hours after the application

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fear of movement

    It was evaluated with the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKÖ). This scale, developed to measure fear of movement/re-injury, consists of 17 questions. The scale includes injury/re-injury and fear-avoidance parameters in work-related activities.

    Time frame: Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  2. Proprioceptive force sense

    It was evaluated with a pressurized biofeedback device. While the patients were lying on the treatment bed in a supine position, the biofeedback device was placed under the knee and its pressure was adjusted to 20 mmHg. Patients were asked to make maximum isometric contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle and maintain it for 5 seconds. The highest value read from the device during the patients' contractions was recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  3. Joint range of motion

    Knee flexion range of motion measurements were made using a goniometer while the patient was lying in the prone position.

    Time frame: Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  4. Joint position sense

    Baseline Digital Inclinometer was used for this. Knee extension movement was performed for the right and left extremities in eyes open and eyes closed positions. The reposition angle method was used to measure joint position sense. According to this method; The patient's extremity was moved to the required position by the physiotherapist. The patient was asked to remember this position by waiting 5 seconds in this position. The patient was then asked to bring his extremity back to that position.

    Time frame: Baseline and 48 hours after the application

  5. Quality of life

    It was evaluated using the SF-36 scale. The scale consists of a total of 36 questions in eight subsections. These sections are: physical function, body pain, limitation due to physical problems, limitation due to emotional problems, cognitive well-being, social competence, energy, general health. In the scale, each section is evaluated separately, and each question is scored between 0 and 100. The increase in score is interpreted as an improvement in health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and 48 hours after the application

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Amasya University
    Amasya, Merkez 05100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: a meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness. Sports Med. 2012 Feb 1;42(2):153-64. doi: 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000. PubMed 22124445 ↗
  • Weiss CB, Lundberg M, Hamberg P, DeHaven KE, Gillquist J. Non-operative treatment of meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Jul;71(6):811-22. PubMed 2745476 ↗
  • Reicher MA, Hartzman S, Duckwiler GR, Bassett LW, Anderson LJ, Gold RH. Meniscal injuries: detection using MR imaging. Radiology. 1986 Jun;159(3):753-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.159.3.3754645. PubMed 3754645 ↗
  • Ageberg E. Consequences of a ligament injury on neuromuscular function and relevance to rehabilitation - using the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee as model. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002 Jun;12(3):205-12. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00022-6. PubMed 12086815 ↗
  • Spindler KP, Schils JP, Bergfeld JA, Andrish JT, Weiker GG, Anderson TE, Piraino DW, Richmond BJ, Medendorp SV. Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):551-7. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100412. PubMed 8368416 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06637670
Lead sponsor
Amasya University
Responsible party
Kübra Okuyucu (Assistant Professor, Amasya University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2023
Completion
Aug 1, 2024
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion