CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06631469Updated Apr 18, 2025

Behaviour-focused Personalised Nutrition Intervention

An interventional study of Personalised behavioural sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations and Personalised sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations in Dietary Behaviours, Sustainable Healthy Diet and Personalised Nutrition, sponsored by University College Dublin. Completed at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-18.

Sponsored by University College Dublin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to test the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel, behaviour-focused personalised nutrition intervention compared to a control personalised nutrition intervention for improving adherence to sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations in university students.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be recruited from the University College Dublin (UCD) PLAN'EAT Living Lab (LL) Citizen Panel which will form a separate registration. The UCD PLAN'EAT LL is a series of studies designed to develop, implement, and evaluate strategies to support University students' transition towards a sustainable healthy diet. The UCD PLAN'EAT LL study will recruit up to n=500 healthy students (aged 18-30 years) attending UCD, Belfield Campus, to join the UCD PLAN'EAT LL Citizen Panel. Upon successful screening and completion of informed consent, participants will be invited to join the UCD PLAN'EAT LL Citizen Panel and complete initial baseline data collection measures (which will be detailed in a separate registration). Following completion of this baseline data collection, participants within the UCD PLAN'EAT LL Citizen Panel will be subsequently invited to participate in this study detailed below.

Participants within the UCD PLAN'EAT LL Citizen Panel will be invited to participate in a 4-week study. This study will aim to recruit n=40 participants within the UCD PLAN'EAT LL Citizen Panel. After successful screening and informed consent, participants will be randomised into two separate groups (n=20 control group; n=20 intervention group) receiving different types of personalised recommendations and strategies using decision tree algorithms to support them to consume a healthier and more sustainable diet. The control group will receive a personalised dietary plan and standardised behavioural support (based on previous personalised nutrition trials and usual care in dietetic practice) to meet their personalised dietary recommendations. The intervention group will receive the same as the control group, with the addition of receiving personalised behavioural support and strategies to help them meet their personalised dietary recommendations.

Baseline: Participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire including questions on demographics, health, dietary behaviours, and lifestyle and a dietary assessment. The dietary assessment will include 3 online 24-hour dietary recalls (2 non-consecutive weekdays and 1 weekend day) (via the web-based dietary recall tool, Foodbook24).

Following completion of baseline measures, participants will be invited to attend a study visit in UCD. Participants will undergo a diet counselling session, where they will receive a personalised feedback report and advice from a nutritionist on how to achieve their goal of eating a more sustainable and healthy diet.

Midpoint: Participants will be contacted by a member of the research team via email or phone message to check their progression and to address any queries.

Endpoint: At the end of the 4-week study, participants will complete a diet-related questionnaire and a second dietary assessment. The dietary assessment will include 3 online 24-hour dietary recalls (2 non-consecutive weekdays and 1 weekend day) (via the web-based dietary recall tool, Foodbook24).

Following completion of endpoint measures, retention rates (number of participants who complete endpoint measures / number of participants enrolled into the study x 100) and data completion rates (number of complete datasets for each outcome measure / number of participants enrolled ×100) will be calculated to assess study feasibility and acceptability.

Process Evaluation:

At the end of this study, all participants will be invited to complete a study evaluation questionnaire including feasibility, acceptability, and engagement measures. In addition, a subsample of participants will also be invited to participate in focus groups or one-to-one interviews to explore topics on study feasibility encompassing, for example, their study experience, study acceptability, factors affecting participation rates (e.g., barriers/ enablers), study engagement, and suggestions for improvement. The focus groups or one-to-one interviews will be guided by the APEASE (Acceptability, Practicality, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects, Equity) criteria.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dietary Behaviours
  • Sustainable Healthy Diet
  • Personalised Nutrition

Keywords

  • Sustainable diet
  • Personalised nutrition
  • Dietary behaviours
  • University
  • Students
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University College Dublin is the lead sponsor of 108 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Student Participants:

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be a UCD student (aged 18-30 years) attending Belfield Campus.
  • Be an adult between the age of 18-30 years old, and in general good health.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not attend UCD Belfield Campus.
  • Are under 18 years of age or over 30 years of age.
  • Have a diagnosis of an acute or chronic medical condition that could interfere with the outcomes of the study. Such diagnosis include (but not limited to) cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, cancers (within the past 5 years), etc.
  • Are pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant.
  • Are following a medically prescribed diet.
  • Are immunocompromised or have a suspected immunodeficiency.
  • Have a known food allergy.
  • Taking part in another diet-related research study that could interfere with the outcomes of this study
  • Consume ≥2 servings per day of legumes.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Personalised behavioural sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations

    Personalised dietary plan, standardised behavioural support (based on previous personalised nutrition trials and usual care in dietetic practice), plus personalised behavioural support and strategies aimed at meeting personalised dietary recommendations.

    Behavioral: Personalised behavioural sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations

  • Active comparator
    Personalised sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations

    Personalised dietary plan and standardised behavioural support (based on previous personalised nutrition trials and usual care in dietetic practice) aimed at meeting personalised dietary recommendations.

    Behavioral: Personalised sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations

Interventions

  • BehavioralPersonalised behavioural sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations

    Personalised dietary plan and standardised behavioural support (based on previous personalised nutrition trials and usual care in dietetic practice), plus the addition of receiving personalised behavioural support and strategies.

  • BehavioralPersonalised sustainable and healthy dietary recommendations

    Personalised dietary plan and standardised behavioural support and strategies (based on previous personalised nutrition trials and usual care in dietetic practice).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Legume intake (grams per day)

    Participants will record their diet at baseline (habitual diet) and endpoint (intervention diet) using an online 24-hour recall method. Legume intake will be calculated using dietary intake records (baseline: 3x 24-hour recalls; endpoint: 3x 24-hour recalls). The primary outcome measure is the change in legume intake (g/ day) as a result of the intervention diet.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Plant-based food intake (grams per day)

    Participants will record their diet at baseline (habitual diet) and endpoint (intervention diet) using an online 24-hour recall method. Plant-based food intake will be calculated using dietary intake records (baseline: 3x 24-hour recalls; endpoint: 3x 24-hour recalls). The secondary outcome measure is the change in plant-based food intake (g/ day) as a result of the intervention diet.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Fruit intake (grams per day)

    Participants will record their diet at baseline (habitual diet) and endpoint (intervention diet) using an online 24-hour recall method. Fruit intake will be calculated using dietary intake records (baseline: 3x 24-hour recalls; endpoint: 3x 24-hour recalls). The secondary outcome measure is the change in fruit intake (g/ day) as a result of the intervention diet.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Vegetable intake (grams per day)

    Participants will record their diet at baseline (habitual diet) and endpoint (intervention diet) using an online 24-hour recall method. Vegetable intake will be calculated using dietary intake records (baseline: 3x 24-hour recalls; endpoint: 3x 24-hour recalls). The secondary outcome measure is the change in vegetable intake (g/ day) as a result of the intervention diet.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Meat intake (grams per day)

    Participants will record their diet at baseline (habitual diet) and endpoint (intervention diet) using an online 24-hour recall method. Meat intake will be calculated using dietary intake records (baseline: 3x 24-hour recalls; endpoint: 3x 24-hour recalls). The secondary outcome measure is the change in meat intake (g/ day) as a result of the intervention diet.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. High fat, sugar, salt (HFSS) food intake (grams per day)

    Participants will record their diet at baseline (habitual diet) and endpoint (intervention diet) using an online 24-hour recall method. High fat, sugar, and salt food intake will be calculated using dietary intake records (baseline: 3x 24-hour recalls; endpoint: 3x 24-hour recalls). The secondary outcome measure is the change in high fat, sugar, and salt food intake (g/ day) as a result of the intervention diet.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility

    Following completion of endpoint measures, retention rates (number of participants who complete endpoint measures / number of participants enrolled into the study x 100) will be calculated to assess study feasibility and acceptability.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Feasibility

    Following completion of endpoint measures, data completion rates (number of complete datasets for each outcome measure / number of participants enrolled × 100) will be calculated to assess study feasibility and acceptability.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions reported as kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents per day

    Participants will record their diet at baseline (habitual diet) and endpoint (intervention diet) using an online 24-hour recall method. Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions will be estimated using food, nutrient and food-related greenhouse gas emission databases (measured as kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents). The tertiary outcome measure is the change in diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (kgCO2-eq/day) as a result of the intervention diet.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Self-reported behavioural automaticity index

    Participants will record their self-reported behavioural automaticity at baseline and endpoint via a questionnaire. Each participant's score can range from 4-28 (with 4 indicating low behavioural automaticity and 28 indicating high behavioural automaticity). The quaternary outcome measure is the change in participants self-reported behavioural automaticity as a result of the intervention.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Process Evaluation

    At the end of this study, participants will complete an evaluation questionnaire. A subsample of participants will be invited to participate in focus groups or one-to-one interviews. Participants will evaluate study feasibility on topics encompassing: study experience, study acceptability, factors affecting participation rates (barriers and enablers), study engagement and suggestions for improvement. The quinary outcome is participants evaluation of this study.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University College Dublin
    Dublin, Ireland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Davies KP, Gibney ER, Leonard UM, Lindberg L, Woodside JV, Kiely ME, Nugent AP, Arranz E, Conway MC, McCarthy SN, O'Sullivan AM. Developing and testing personalised nutrition feedback for more sustainable healthy diets: the MyPlanetDiet randomised controlled trial protocol. Eur J Nutr. 2024 Oct;63(7):2681-2696. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03457-0. Epub 2024 Jul 6. PubMed 38970665 ↗
  • Macready AL, Fallaize R, Butler LT, Ellis JA, Kuznesof S, Frewer LJ, Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Araujo-Soares V, Fischer AR, Stewart-Knox BJ, Mathers JC, Lovegrove JA. Application of Behavior Change Techniques in a Personalized Nutrition Electronic Health Intervention Study: Protocol for the Web-Based Food4Me Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 9;7(4):e87. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8703. PubMed 29631993 ↗
  • Writing Group of the Nutrition Care Process/Standardized Language Committee. Nutrition care process and model part I: the 2008 update. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jul;108(7):1113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.027. No abstract available. PubMed 18589014 ↗
  • Rigby RR, Mitchell LJ, Hamilton K, Williams LT. The Use of Behavior Change Theories in Dietetics Practice in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jul;120(7):1172-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 May 20. PubMed 32444328 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — At the beginning of the study, each participant will have a study code assigned to them. All data collected from the study will be stored using these unique study codes. A file will be set up which will be stored in a separate location to the study data. This file will contain a list which will link each participants contact details to the corresponding ID code. All stored information will be password-protected and only accessible to the research team/ named researchers on the project. Pseudonymised/ anonymised data will be shared with PLAN'EAT partners where appropriate.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06631469
Lead sponsor
University College Dublin
Collaborators
PLAN'EAT Consortium (https://planeat-project.eu/)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 29, 2024
Completion
Feb 26, 2025
Last update
Apr 18, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion