CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06631248Updated Oct 8, 2024

Effects of Coordinative Exercise on Physical Fitness, Motor Competence, and Inhibitory Control in Preschoolers

An interventional study of Coordinative exercise protocol in Motor Skills, Inhibitory Control and Physical Fitness, sponsored by Namik Kemal University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 6 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-08.

Sponsored by Namik Kemal University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Sep 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
5 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study was to determine whether a structured coordinative exercise program could improve physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control in preschool children. The main questions it aimed to answer were:

Does the exercise program improve children's physical fitness (agility, balance, vertical jump)? Does it enhance motor competence, particularly hand-eye coordination and balance? Does it affect inhibitory control, a key component of cognitive function? Researchers compared children who participated in an 8-week exercise program to those who followed their regular school activities.

Participants:

Took part in two 30-minute exercise sessions per week for 8 weeks Were assessed before and after the intervention on physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control The study found significant improvements in physical fitness and motor competence, but no significant changes in inhibitory control.

Read the detailed description

Scope and Content of the Study

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured coordinative exercise protocol aimed at improving physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control in preschool children. Early childhood is considered a critical period for both physical and cognitive development. During this phase, enhancing motor skills and physical fitness forms a crucial foundation for long-term health, social adaptation, and academic success. However, these developmental opportunities may be missed if children do not engage in sufficient levels of physical activity. In this context, the study sought to investigate the effects of exercise interventions that support both motor and cognitive skills in preschool-aged children.

The main goal of the study was to examine how coordinative exercises improve physical fitness and motor competence in preschool children. Additionally, the study explored the impact of these exercises on inhibitory control, a cognitive skill related to attention and impulse control. Inhibitory control is especially important during the preschool years, as it directly affects children\'s learning processes and social interactions, serving as a key component of executive functions.

Research Protocol and Exercise Intervention

This study was conducted with 41 children, who were randomly assigned to two groups: an exercise group and a control group. The exercise group participated in an 8-week program, consisting of 30-minute sessions twice a week. The program was designed to improve various motor skills such as balance, hand-eye coordination, jumping, and locomotor abilities through play-based activities. The control group continued with their regular school curriculum without additional physical activity interventions.

The exercise protocol included open-ended tasks that progressively moved from simple to complex, requiring movement planning. These play-based exercises aimed to create an engaging and active environment in which children could participate socially. The coordinative exercises focused on supporting a wide range of motor movements and control mechanisms, encouraging the coordination of different body components in harmony.

Assessed Parameters

In the study, children\'s physical fitness, motor competence, and inhibitory control were assessed both before and after the intervention:

Physical fitness was measured through tests of balance, agility, and vertical jumping.

Motor competence was evaluated using the KTK3+ test battery, which includes tasks such as hand-eye coordination, balancing, and jumping sideways.

Inhibitory control was measured using the Go/No-Go test from the Early Years Toolbox, assessing how well children manage attention and control impulses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Motor Skills
  • Inhibitory Control
  • Physical Fitness

Keywords

  • coordination
  • exercise
  • preschool children
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Namik Kemal University is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Typically developing children
  • Participants must not be taking medication
  • Must not have any cardiovascular, neurological, orthopaedic or psychiatric disease
  • Must be between 5-6 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having any cardiovascular, neurological, orthopaedic or psychiatric disease
  • Having intellectual disability
  • Not being between 5-6 years old
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Coordinative exercise protocol

    coordinative exercise group

    Other: Coordinative exercise protocol

  • No intervention
    control group

    The control group continued the standard education curriculum in kindergarten and did not receive any intervention

Interventions

  • OtherCoordinative exercise protocol

    During the eight-week period, all children in the structured coordinative exercise intervention group participated in 30-minute sessions twice a week on the same day and time. The purpose-oriented basic movement patterns created in the coordinative exercise content were organised in a play-oriented manner suitable for the preschool age range.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Backward Balancing (number of repetitions)

    Backward balancing is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This test measures the ability to maintain balance while moving backwards on a balance beam. Unit of Measurement: number of repetitions (number of backward steps).

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  2. Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Move Sideways (Number of repetitions within 20 seconds)

    Move Sideways, is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This test evaluates the ability to perform coordinated sideways movements. Unit of Measurement: Repetitions (Number of repetitions within 20 seconds).

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  3. Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Jumping Sideways (Number of repetitions within 15 seconds)

    jumping sideways is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This test measures the ability to perform coordinated sideways jumps. Unit of Measurement: Repetitions (number of repetitions within 15 seconds)

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  4. Changes in Motor Competence: KTK3+ Eye-Hand Coordination Task (Number of repetitions within 30 seconds)

    Eye-Hand Coordination is a component of the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK3+) motor competence test battery. This task measures the ability to coordinate visual input with manual responses. It is a measurement method that involves throwing a tennis ball against a wall from a certain distance and holding it with the other hand. Unit of Measurement: Number of correct repetitions in 30 seconds.

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  5. Changes in Counter Movement Jump Performance, (Highest jump height (cm))

    Counter Movement Jump Performance was assessed using an accelerometer system (IVMES Athlete, Ankara, Turkey). Unit of Measurement: Centimeter (cm) - Highest jump height

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  6. Changes in Balance Performance - Static Balance (%)

    Balance performance was assessed with a static balance task using a movable platform (Sensbalance MiniBoard; Sensamove®, Utrecht, The Netherlands) that can be connected to a computer. Unit of Measurement: Automatically calculated scores in % were used.

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  7. Changes in Balance Performance - Dynamic Balance (%)

    Balance performance was assessed with a dynamic balance task using a moving platform (Sensbalance MiniBoard; Sensamove®, Utrecht, The Netherlands) that can be connected to a computer. Unit of Measurement: Automatically calculated scores in % were used.

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  8. Changes in Agility (time to complete the test - in seconds)

    It was evaluated using the Pro-Agility Test. Unit of Measurement: Seconds (s) - Time to complete the test

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

  9. Changes in Inhibitory Control

    Inhibitory control was assessed using the Go/No-Go test in the Early Years Toolbox, which measures the ability to suppress inappropriate responses. Unit of Measurement: Number of Correct Responses and reaction time of the number of correct responses (ms).

    Time frame: before and at the end of the 8-week intervention.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Sports Sciences Research and Development Centre
    Tekirdag, Suleymanpasa 59030, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chang YK, Tsai YJ, Chen TT, Hung TM. The impacts of coordinative exercise on executive function in kindergarten children: an ERP study. Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(2):187-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3360-9. Epub 2012 Dec 13. Erratum In: Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(2):255. PubMed 23239198 ↗
  • Borioni F, Biino V, Tinagli V, Pesce C. Effects of Baby Swimming on Motor and Cognitive Development: A Pilot Trial. Percept Mot Skills. 2022 Aug;129(4):977-1000. doi: 10.1177/00315125221090203. Epub 2022 Apr 26. PubMed 35473471 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We plan to share the following individual participant data (IPD) from our study: Measurements: Data obtained from Physical Fitness, Motor Competence and Inhibitor control parameters will be shared. Data Anonymization: All shared IPD will be fully anonymized to protect participant privacy. Personal identifiers such as names, addresses, and contact information will be removed. Data will be aggregated where necessary to prevent re-identification of participants. Data Format: The data will be shared in a secure, standardized format (e.g., CSV or Excel files) to facilitate ease of use and analysis by other researchers. Access Control: Access to the shared IPD will be granted to qualified researchers who provide a valid research proposal and agree to comply with data use agreements that ensure the data will be used solely for research purposes and not for commercial gain.

Supporting information: Study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06631248
Lead sponsor
Namik Kemal University
Collaborators
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Responsible party
umut canlı (Assoc. Prof., Namik Kemal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Start date
Jan 20, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 25, 2023
Completion
Jun 29, 2023
Last update
Oct 8, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion