CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06628453CGM2Updated Jun 29, 2026

CGM for Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy

An interventional study of CGM in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Pregnancy, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Recruiting at 7 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-29.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
564
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if continuous glucose monitoring works better than self-monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks) to treat type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. It will also learn about all risk factors (biologic, personal, social) for maternal and infant complications in type 2 diabetes pregnancies. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does continuous glucose monitoring improve infant outcomes compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose?
  2. Does continuous glucose monitoring improve maternal diabetes control and other maternal outcomes compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose?
  3. What other factors increase the risk of maternal and infant complications?

Participants will:

  1. Use continuous glucose monitoring or self-monitoring of blood glucose to monitor blood sugar control from enrollment until delivery
  2. Have blood drawn at enrollment, 24 weeks, 34 weeks and delivery to measure hemoglobin A1c levels and store blood for future analysis
  3. Complete surveys about social support, environmental stressors, diabetes distress and glucose monitoring satisfaction at research visits
  4. Have umbilical cord blood collected at delivery for analysis
Read the detailed description

We will conduct a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial of pregnant individuals with T2DM to test the effectiveness of CGM at improving maternal and neonatal outcomes, compared to SMBG. All pregnant women who have T2DM will be screened for eligibility. If a patient is eligible, the study will be explained to them and if they consent to participate, they will be randomized centrally in a 1:1 ratio to CGM or SMBG.

Participants randomized to CGM will receive a Dexcom G7 CGM and be instructed how to apply it, access the CGM data, and how to interpret and respond to trend arrows and alerts. Participants will replace the CGM device with a new sensor every 10 days for the entire pregnancy. Participants randomized to SMBG will be instructed to perform SMBG at least 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour or 2-hours postprandial) and share their glucose data with their provider according to standard care. In order to collect comparable assessments of glycemic control between the groups, participants randomized to SMBG will wear a masked CGM for 10 days after randomization (Visit 1) and after Visits 2 (24 weeks) and Visit 3 (34 weeks). All participants will be provided a glucometer if they do not already have one and will have HbA1c and maternal serum collected at enrollment (6-22 weeks) and all study visits (24 weeks, 34 weeks, and delivery).

We will utilize ACOG and ADA recommendations for glycemic targets in pregnancy a standardized protocol with graduated goals for glycemic control to ensure consistency across arms and study sites. For pregnant individuals randomized to CGM, the target range will be 63-140mg/dL. For pregnant individuals randomized to SMBG, the targets will be fasting \<95mg/dL, 1-hour postprandial less than 140mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial less than 120mg/dL. CGM reports and glucose logs will be reviewed at least every 1-2 weeks, and therapy adjustments (insulin, metformin, diet and/or lifestyle) will be recommended if less than 70% of glucose values are at target, regardless of the method of glucose monitoring. Additional therapy adjustments will be encouraged to achieve greater than 70% glucose values at target so long as there is not significant hypoglycemia (i.e. greater than 4%).

Telehealth visits may be utilized in addition to outpatient in person visits at the discretion of the provider, but should be used similarly for the CGM and SMBG groups. This protocol for glycemic management will be followed at all times including both at outpatient visits and during inpatient antepartum hospitalization. Intrapartum glycemic control, fetal testing and timing and route of delivery will be determined by the clinical provider in accordance with ACOG recommendations. After birth, umbilical cord blood will be collected for metabolic analyses, and neonates will have a heelstick performed to measure capillary blood glucose as part of usual care given maternal T2DM. Additional care including NICU admission and treatment of hypoglycemia will be at the discretion of the neonatal provider.

Validated screening tools to assess different SDoH domains will be administered at the first 2 study visits. At enrollment, each participant will be administered the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks and Experiences (PRAPARE) survey, a validated screening tool designed to identify SDoH including personal factors, family and housing, money and resources, and social and emotional health and safety. The home address provided will be used to calculate SVI and area deprivation index (ADI), a measure created to assess socioeconomic disadvantage at a neighborhood level based on income, education, employment and housing quality. Participants will complete the U.S. Adult Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM), a 10-item self-report questionnaire aimed at assessing food security over the prior 12 months as food insecurity may be associated with adverse outcomes. Participants will also complete the Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS), a 29-item survey designed to identify the overall amount of DM-related distress as well as the sources of stress including hypoglycemia, long-term health, healthcare provider, interpersonal issues, shame or stigma, healthcare access, and management demands. At visit 2, participants will complete the Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL) and the Diabetes Numeracy Test 15 (DNT15) given association between lower educational attainment and health literacy and numeracy with worse outcomes. Participants will also complete the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the only self-reported measure in a study of psychosocial stress associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and the Experiences of Discrimination (EOD) scale, a 9-item self-report about lifetime experiences of discrimination attributed to race, ethnicity or skin color. At delivery, participants will repeat the T2-DDAS to assess if CGM impacted DM distress and complete a Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS), a validated tool to assess satisfaction with the assigned method of glucose monitoring.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
  • Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Pregnancy
  • CGM
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 564 is above the median of 80 across 7,525 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 284 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 124 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with daily insulin injections or oral hypoglycemic agents diagnosed before pregnancy or at less than 14 weeks gestation with hemoglobin A1c 6.5% or greater
  • Pregnant with viable fetus at 6 to less than 23 weeks gestation
  • Maternal age 18-50 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to wear CGM due to intolerance to medical-grade adhesives or skin conditions
  • Multiple gestation
  • Major fetal anomaly or two or more minor fetal anomalies
  • Planned delivery outside study consortium
  • Participating in another conflicting interventional study
  • Participation in this trial in a previous pregnancy
  • Patient unable to consent
  • Physician refusal for other reasons
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
564 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Continuous Glucose Monitoring

    Real-time continuous glucose monitoring

    Device: CGM

  • No intervention
    Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose

    Self-monitoring of blood glucose (standard of care)

Interventions

  • DeviceCGM

    Real-time continuous glucose monitoring

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time in Range (TIR) at 34 weeks gestation

    Percentage of time spent within target range (63-140mg/dL) on Continuous Glucose Monitoring at 34 weeks gestation

    Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks gestation

  2. Composite Neonatal Morbidity

    Composite morbidity of the neonate including one or more of preterm birth (delivery less than 37 weeks for any indication), birth trauma (shoulder dystocia with nerve injury, clavicular or humeral fracture or 3 or more maneuvers to resolve), hypoglycemia (requiring treatment with dextrose gel or IV within 24 hours of birth), hyperbilirubinemia (requiring phototherapy within 72 hours of birth), large-for-gestational-age infant (birthweight greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age), and miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death prior to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life

Secondary outcomes

  1. Preterm birth

    Delivery less than 37 weeks gestation

    Time frame: Delivery

  2. Birth trauma

    Shoulder dystocia with nerve injury, clavicular or humeral fracture or 3 or more maneuvers to relieve

    Time frame: Delivery

  3. Neonatal hypoglycemia

    Low neonatal glucose requiring treatment with dextrose gel or IV within 24 hours of life

    Time frame: Delivery to 24 hours of life

  4. Hyperbilirubinemia

    Elevated bilirubin requiring phototherapy within 72 hours of life

    Time frame: Delivery to 72 hours of life

  5. Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonate

    Birthweight greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age

    Time frame: Delivery

  6. Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate

    Birthweight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age

    Time frame: Delivery

  7. Fetal glucose

    Concentration of umbilical cord blood glucose (mg/dL)

    Time frame: Delivery

  8. Fetal insulin

    Concentration of umbilical cord blood insulin (uU/mL)

    Time frame: Delivery

  9. Fetal C-peptide

    Concentration of umbilical cord blood C-peptide (ng/mL)

    Time frame: Delivery

  10. Fetal leptin

    Concentration of umbilical cord blood leptin (ng/mL)

    Time frame: Delivery

  11. Fetal ghrelin

    Concentration of umbilical cord blood ghrelin (uU/L)

    Time frame: Delivery

  12. Fetal surfactant protein D

    Concentration of umbilical cord blood surfactant protein D (ng/mL)

    Time frame: Delivery

  13. Time Above Range (TAR) at 34 weeks

    Percentage of time spent above range greater than 140mg/dL on Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) at 34 weeks

    Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks

  14. Time Below Range (TBR) at 34 weeks

    Percentage of time spent below range less than 63mg/dL on Continuous Glucose Monitoring at 34 weeks

    Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks

  15. Mean glucose at 34 weeks

    Average glucose in mg/dL using Continuous Glucose Monitoring data at 34 weeks

    Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks

  16. Glucose Management Indicator (GMI)

    Glucose management indicator as an estimate of hemoglobin A1c calculated using mean glucose on CGM at 34 weeks

    Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks

  17. Glucose variability at 34 weeks

    Coefficient of variation calculated as the mean glucose divided by standard deviation using Continuous Glucose Monitoring data at 34 weeks

    Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks

  18. Mean fasting glucose at 34 weeks

    Average glucose at 6-7am on Continuous Glucose Monitoring at 34 weeks

    Time frame: 33 to 35 weeks

  19. Hemoglobin A1c at Delivery

    Hemoglobin A1c (%) at delivery

    Time frame: Delivery

  20. Insulin total daily dose at delivery

    Total number of units of insulin taken per day at time of delivery

    Time frame: Delivery

  21. Cesarean delivery

    First cesarean delivery or cesarean delivery after a history of prior cesarean

    Time frame: Delivery

  22. Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction

    Score on glucose monitoring satisfaction survey at delivery

    Time frame: Delivery

  23. Fetal or neonatal death

    Miscarriage (pregnancy loss less than 20 weeks), stillbirth (fetal death at 20 weeks or more), or neonatal death (death after birth up to 28 days of life)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life

  24. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission

    Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit with length of stay greater than 24 hours

    Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life

  25. Neonatal length of stay

    Duration of neonatal hospitalization after delivery

    Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life

  26. Neonatal mechanical ventilation

    Neonate requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation for respiratory support

    Time frame: From the date of delivery to the date of neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 12 months of life

  27. Insulin increase during pregnancy

    Percentage change in total daily dose of insulin at delivery compared to enrollment

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of delivery, assessed up to 9 months

  28. Preeclampsia

    Elevated blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg after 20 weeks gestation with proteinuria or other severe features by ACOG criteria (may be superimposed on chronic hypertension or not)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of maternal hospital discharge after delivery, assessed up to 9 months

  29. Postpartum infection

    Developing one or more of endometritis, wound infection or other wound complication such as seroma, hematoma or dehiscence)

    Time frame: From the date of delivery through 6 weeks&#39; postpartum

  30. Glucose Monitoring Adherence

    Defined as percentage of expected self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values completed based on recommended 4 values per day for participants in the SMBG arm and percentage of time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in use in the CGM arm

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of delivery, assessed up to 9 months

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of California at San Diego
    San Diego, California 92121, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
    Recruiting
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97213, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
    Recruiting
  • Prisma Health Greenville Memorial Hospital
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Padgett CE, Ye Y, Champion ML, Fleenor RE, Orfanakos VB, Casey BM, Battarbee AN. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Perinatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Nov 1;144(5):677-683. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005609. Epub 2024 May 23. PubMed 38781595 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All data produced in the course of the project will be preserved and shared including: 1. Recruitment rates, reasons for refusal, adherence, loss to follow up 2. Demographics and clinical data 3. Glucose and laboratory values 4. Satisfaction and survey responses

Supporting information: Study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06628453
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Ashley N. Battarbee (Associate Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Start date
Apr 8, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2026

Study contacts

Ashley Battarbee, MD, MSCR
Contact
anbattarbee@uabmc.edu
205-975-2361
Ashley Battarbee, MD, MSCR
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion