CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06626139SnSUpdated Jun 4, 2026

Investigating the Interaction of Psilocybin and Context of Its Administration in Healthy Volunteers

A Phase 2 interventional study of Psilocybin and Context 1 in Healthy Participants With Lower-than-average Mental Well-being, sponsored by Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, MA. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, MA · Phase 2, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

One hundred twenty healthy participants, ages 21 to 70, who experience moderate-to-lower-than-average mental well-being will be evenly randomized into four different study arms, using a 2x2 factorial design. Depending on the study arm, participants will either receive an inactive placebo or up to 25mg psilocybin (oral dose), in one of two set and setting conditions; drug administration contexts that are predicted to modulate drug effects.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate any interaction effects between an oral dose of psilocybin and the surrounding context (set and setting).

Read the detailed description

Recent research posits that psychedelic medicine is best employed as a combination treatment, i.e., as drug x psychological support or psychotherapy referred to for simplicity as 'psychedelic therapy'. It is assumed that positive outcomes via psychedelic therapy critically depend on a synergistic relationship between drug-induced brain and mind plasticity and supportive contextual factors (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018; Carhart-Harris and Friston, 2019). These contextual factors have been referred to as 'set and setting' (Leary et al., 1963) or 'extrapharmacological'- highlighting elements beyond the drug that contribute to relevant outcomes (Hartogsohn, 2016).

The proposed experiment is a double-blind, randomized between-subjects 2 x 2 factorial study in 120 volunteers who experience low psychological well-being at baseline and have limited prior experience with psychedelics (1:1:1:1, n = 30 per condition). The main aim of the study is to assess the contribution of a select number of pre-defined contextual variables (both 'set' and 'setting') on the nature and trajectory of effects linked to a single dosing session with either psilocybin (oral, 25mg) or placebo (oral, inert).

The study will have four primary outcomes, two pertaining to mental health, namely: changes in psychological well-being - as measured via the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales (WEMWBS), from baseline to 4 weeks post dosing session (primary endpoint) and changes in the Watts Connectedness Scale (WCS) at consistent timepoints. The two primary outcomes indexing the quality of the acute experience will be: Emotional Breakthrough - measured via mean scores on the Emotional Breakthrough Inventory (EBI), and Challenging experience (CE) - defined and measured here as scores on the following four sub-factors of the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): fear, insanity, isolation, and paranoia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Participants With Lower-than-average Mental Well-being

Keywords

  • well-being
  • psilocybin
  • psychedelic
  • neuroimaging
  • healthy volunteers
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, MA is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

If you are interested in participating in this study, please follow this link to check your eligibility: https://tiny.ucsf.edu/setsettingscreener

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants will be considered for inclusion if they:

  1. Are between 21 and 70 years of age
  2. Are fluent in speaking and reading English
  3. Are able to swallow pills/capsules
  4. If able to become pregnant, must be non-lactating, have a negative pregnancy test at study entry and prior to each Experimental Session and must agree to an adequate form of birth control over the course of the study. Adequate forms of birth control include intrauterine device (IUD), injected, implanted, intravaginal, or transdermal hormonal methods, abstinence, oral hormones plus a barrier contraception, vasectomized sole partner, or double barrier contraception. Two forms of contraception are required with any barrier method or oral hormones (i.e., condom plus diaphragm, condom or diaphragm plus spermicide, oral hormonal contraceptives plus spermicide or condom). Unable to become pregnant is defined as documented hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and/or tubal ligation), permanently sterile by medical device such as Essure, postmenopausal, or assigned male sex at birth.
  5. Able and willing to provide informed consent
  6. Able and willing to use computers and tablets or phones to enter electronic data
  7. Agree to inform the investigators within 48 hours of any new or changed medical conditions.
  8. Have an identified support person
  9. For those dosed with psilocybin, their prior consent to be accompanied home (or to an otherwise safe destination) by a support person, chosen by them - ahead of time, or by a member of the study team.
  10. Willing to provide contact details for a friend or family member, should there be an inability to make direct contact with the participant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded if they:

  1. Have a current diagnosed psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the study clinician or PI, renders to person psychologically unstable or unduly vulnerable, or interferes with activities of daily living, or could impact attendance at or participation in study activities
  2. Have a medically significant condition that renders the person unsuitable for the study
  3. Give a positive alcohol breathalyzer test result on any study visit
  4. A positive urine drug screen to any excluded substances prior to an Experimental Session, which warrants exclusion based on concerns that it may compromise safety or confound outcomes
  5. Are breastfeeding, or have a positive pregnancy test at screening or at any point during the course of the study
  6. Systolic and diastolic BP values exceeding 139 SBP and exceeding 89 DBP and heart rate exceeding 90 bpm would result in exclusion from the study.
  7. Present with a exceeding 450 msec or with evidence of cardiac damage, ischemia, or heart disease.
  8. Have received an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit
  9. Have an allergy or intolerance to any of the materials contained in either drug product or setting components, such as certain scents.
  10. Have MRI contraindications (e.g., metal implants, pacemakers, claustrophobia etc.)
  11. Have any current problem which, in the opinion of the investigator or clinician, might interfere with participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Psilocybin C1

    Following screening and a baseline assessment visit, healthy volunteers will receive one dose of up to 25mg psilocybin in a context (Context 1) that is hypothesized to modulate acute and post-acute drug effects.

    Drug: Psilocybin · Behavioral: Context 1

  • Experimental
    Psilocybin C2

    Following screening and a baseline assessment visit, healthy volunteers will receive one dose of up to 25mg psilocybin in a context (Context 2) that is hypothesized to modulate acute and post-acute drug effects.

    Drug: Psilocybin · Behavioral: Context 2

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo C1

    Following screening and a baseline assessment visit, healthy volunteers will receive one dose of an inactive placebo in a context (Context 1) that is hypothesized to modulate acute and post-acute drug effects.

    Behavioral: Context 1 · Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo C2

    Following screening and a baseline assessment visit, healthy volunteers will receive one dose of an inactive placebo in a context (Context 2) that is hypothesized to modulate acute and post-acute drug effects.

    Behavioral: Context 2 · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugPsilocybin

    Healthy participants will receive up to 25 mg psilocybin.

  • BehavioralContext 1

    Drug administration will take place in a context (Context 1) that is expected to modulate acute and post-acute drug effects.

  • BehavioralContext 2

    Drug administration will take place in a context (Context 2) that is expected to modulate acute and post-acute drug effects.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Healthy participants will receive an inactive placebo.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) subscales score

    The Challenging Experience Questionnaire is designed to measure challenging psychological experiences associated with the acute effects of psilocybin. For this study, the combined score across four our of its seven subscales will be used as a primary outcome: Fear, Insanity, Isolation, and Paranoia, excluding Grief, Physical Distress, and Death subscales. Scaled scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher levels of challenging experience (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Eight hours post-dose.

  2. Change in Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) score from Baseline to 28 days post-dose

    The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) was developed to enable the monitoring of mental wellbeing in the general population and the evaluation of projects, programmes and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. Scores range form 14 to 70. Higher scores indicate higher levels of mental well-being (better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to 28 days post-dose.

  3. Change in Watts Connectedness Scale (WCS) scores from Baseline to 28 days post-dose

    The WCS is a 3-dimensional index of felt connectedness that may sensitively measure therapeutically relevant psychological changes post-psychedelic use. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher levels of connectedness (better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to 28 days post-dose.

  4. Emotional Breakthrough Inventory (EBI) score

    The Emotional Breakthrough Inventory was developed to assess emotional breakthrough, an important and distinct component of the acute psychedelic experience. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher levels of emotional breakthrough (better outcome).

    Time frame: Eight hours post-dose.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in resting state BOLD activity viafunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

    Assessment parameters include: Eyes-closed resting state fMRI

    Time frame: Baseline to 28 days post-dose.

  2. Changes in BOLD activity during emotional processing via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

    Assessment parameters include: BOLD response during an emotional processing task

    Time frame: Baseline to 28 days post-dose.

  3. Changes in white matter organization via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

    Assessment parameters include: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

    Time frame: Baseline to 28 days post-dose.

  4. Structural brain changes via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

    Assessment parameters include: T1- and T2-weighted imaging

    Time frame: Baseline to 28 days post-dose.

  5. Acute Lempel Ziv Complexity (LZC) via Electroencephalography (EEG)

    Electroencephalography is a method to record an electrogram of the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain. Assessment parameters include: Lempel Ziv Complexity (LZC)

    Time frame: Pre-dose; 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

  6. Spectral power in traditional frequency bands via Electroencephalography (EEG)

    Electroencephalography is a method to record an electrogram of the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain. Assessment parameters include: Spectral power in traditional frequency bands

    Time frame: Pre-dose; 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

  7. Transfer entropy and integrated information via Electroencephalography (EEG)

    Electroencephalography is a method to record an electrogram of the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain. Assessment parameters include: Transfer entropy and integrated information

    Time frame: Pre-dose; 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

  8. Synergistic and redundant activity patterns via Electroencephalography (EEG)

    Electroencephalography is a method to record an electrogram of the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain. Analytic approaches include: Partial information decomposition

    Time frame: Pre-dose; 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

  9. Travelling waves via Electroencephalography (EEG)

    Electroencephalography is a method to record an electrogram of the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain. Assessment parameters include: Travelling waves

    Time frame: Pre-dose; 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • UCSF Mission Bay
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06626139
Lead sponsor
Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, MA
Responsible party
Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, MA (Professor, University of California, San Francisco) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 3, 2024
Start date
Oct 20, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Hannes Kettner, MSc
Contact
setandsetting@ucsf.edu
4158495452
Avery Ostrand, MSc
Contact
avery.ostrand@ucsf.edu
Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Jennifer Mitchell, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion