CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06624163Updated Sep 25, 2026Results posted

Evaluation of Patient Coach Support for Older Adults With Obesity

An interventional study of OHWL Clinic Activities (Standard of Care) and Coach Activities in Obesity, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2023, registered Sep 2024).
Updated Sep 25, 2026Results postedPrimary outcomes revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
60 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the present pilot is to evaluate the outcomes of adding a patient coach to support the Optimal Health Weight and Lifestyle (OHWL) Clinic plan developed by PI Dewar, specifically to address barriers and facilitators of adherence to the plan. This will be accomplished via a coach who is not embedded in clinic care and is supported by pilot research funds. Evaluation of the coach activities, conducted by research personnel, will include compiling data from the electronic health record, a short set of patient report and performance measures, and qualitative interviews.

Read the detailed description

A patient coach added to the OHWL Clinic plan as part of the pilot will help patients who are being treated for weight loss to achieve their goals, help address barriers and facilitators of adherence to referred services such physical therapy and nutritionist appointments and various specialists and links to community services as needed. Evaluation of the coach activities will be conducted by research personnel, which will also include data compilation from the electronic health record, a short set of patient report and performance measures, and qualitative interviews. This project will provide pilot data for future funding proposals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Health Coach
  • Aging
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) equal to or greater than 35
  • Ability to walk across a room with or without an assistive device
  • Willingness and ability to follow instructions
  • Interest in weight management
  • At least two of the following conditions: hypertension, cardiovascular conditions including heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active mental health disorder, such as major depression
  • Moderate to severe cognitive impairment
  • Mobility limited to bed-bound status
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study Participants

    Behavioral: OHWL Clinic Activities (Standard of Care) · Behavioral: Coach Activities

Interventions

  • BehavioralOHWL Clinic Activities (Standard of Care)

    Following a directed history and physical at the initial visit, the OHWL Care provider (OCP) develops a medical and weight management plan, which includes laboratory testing (such as for Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), consultant referrals (e.g. sleep, heart failure clinics) and referral to nutritionists and physical therapy (PT). The OCP begins the process of establishing patient goals, which will be followed up by the coach. The OCP reviews patient progress with the goals during face-to-face visits (some by telehealth) at two, four and six months. As part of the standard initial clinic evaluation, a medical assistant evaluates grip strength (using a hand dynamometer) the timed up and go mobility test; these are repeated at the 6-month visit.

  • BehavioralCoach Activities

    A patient coach follows patients outside of clinic to ensure adherence with referral appointments and use of recommended community services. The coach assesses the participant at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale and follows up with patients via phone over 6 months. The coach utilizes S.M.A.R.T. (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goals to facilitate, for example, transportation, barriers to scheduling, etc. The coach follows up on specialist referral recommendations, physical therapy, and nutrition program, as well as social work recommendations. Barriers and facilitators to program adherence are identified and addressed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participants' Physical Therapy Appointments

    Patients who reported being referred to physical therapy during or before the study and attended at least one physical therapy appointment during the course of the study.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Treatment Goals

    Percentage of participants whose coaches reported successful completion of at least one goal for diet and physical activity based on end of study interview.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Attend Nutritional Consultation Appointments

    Patients who reported attending at least one nutritional consultation appointment during the course of the study, as determined by medical record review.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Access Community Resources

    Patients who reported using a community resource (such as a gym, community park, or other similar resource) at least once during the course of the study.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in PROMIS-28 Score (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

    PROMIS-28 questionnaire gauges health-related quality of life across seven key domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, ability to engage in social activities, pain interference, sleep disturbance. Total scores range from 27 - 140, where a score of 27 indicates lowest quality of life and 140 indicates highest quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  2. Change in Reported Participant Pain Levels

    This is assessed by PROMIS-Global Pain instrument which is a survey administered to patient by Computer adaptive testing, Scale 0-10 (where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable) and will track change during study period

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  3. Change in NHATS (National Health and Aging Trends Study) Score

    NHATS instrument scores individual's self-report of difficulty or dependency with performing activities of daily living such as self-care and mobility and restrictions in instrumental activities of daily living domains. The final survey instrument score is on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being "no difficulty" with performing activities of daily living and 4 being "a lot of difficulty" with performing activities of daily living.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Change in Patient Mobility

    Mobility and balance is measured during clinic visits using TUG (Timed up and go). The patient is asked to rise from a seated position, walk 3 m, turn around, and return and sit in the starting point chair while timed. Patients who fail to complete the test in fewer than 12 s are considered to have elevated fall risk Measurements will be taken every six months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  5. Change in Life Space Assessment Score

    Life-space mobility is a measure of resilience to physical decline and social isolation in older adults. They are nine 'yes/no' questions regarding a person's movements across nine life-space zones in the preceding 3 days. The total score ranges from 0 to 9, where 0 means most restricted life-space and 9 is least restricted life-space.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. NUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Fat

    The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams fat will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. NUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Kilocalories

    The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of total kilocalories will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. NUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Saturated Fat

    The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams saturated fat will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. NUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Sodium

    The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of milligrams sodium will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. NUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Added Sugar

    The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams of added sugar will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. NUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Alcohol

    The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams of alcohol will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. HbA1c Values

    HbA1c values reflects glycemic control. Lower values reflect greater glycemic control

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  8. Total Cholesterol

    Total cholesterol at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  9. Triglycerides

    Triglycerides at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  10. LDL Values

    LDL values at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  11. HDL Levels

    HDL levels at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 25, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStudy Participants
Started19
Attended at least one coach appointment19
Completed17
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1

Outcome measures

PrimaryParticipants' Physical Therapy Appointments

Patients who reported being referred to physical therapy during or before the study and attended at least one physical therapy appointment during the course of the study.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants' Physical Therapy Appointments
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Participants referred to Physical Therapy6
Participants who attended at least one Physical Therapy appointment2
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieve Treatment Goals

Percentage of participants whose coaches reported successful completion of at least one goal for diet and physical activity based on end of study interview.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Treatment Goals
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Treatment Goals18
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Attend Nutritional Consultation Appointments

Patients who reported attending at least one nutritional consultation appointment during the course of the study, as determined by medical record review.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Attend Nutritional Consultation Appointments
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Attend Nutritional Consultation Appointments17
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Access Community Resources

Patients who reported using a community resource (such as a gym, community park, or other similar resource) at least once during the course of the study.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Access Community Resources
ParticipantsStudy Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Access Community Resources10
SecondaryChange in PROMIS-28 Score (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

PROMIS-28 questionnaire gauges health-related quality of life across seven key domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, ability to engage in social activities, pain interference, sleep disturbance. Total scores range from 27 - 140, where a score of 27 indicates lowest quality of life and 140 indicates highest quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS-28 Score (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)
score on a scaleStudy Participants
Baseline103.9 ± 21.2
6 months116.3 ± 13.8
SecondaryChange in Reported Participant Pain Levels

This is assessed by PROMIS-Global Pain instrument which is a survey administered to patient by Computer adaptive testing, Scale 0-10 (where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable) and will track change during study period

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Reported Participant Pain Levels
score on a scaleStudy Participants
Baseline4.1 ± 2.2
6 Months3.2 ± 2.0
SecondaryChange in NHATS (National Health and Aging Trends Study) Score

NHATS instrument scores individual's self-report of difficulty or dependency with performing activities of daily living such as self-care and mobility and restrictions in instrumental activities of daily living domains. The final survey instrument score is on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being "no difficulty" with performing activities of daily living and 4 being "a lot of difficulty" with performing activities of daily living.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in NHATS (National Health and Aging Trends Study) Score
score on a scaleStudy Participants
Baseline1.3164 ± 0.36695
6 months1.0485 ± 0.07652
SecondaryChange in Patient Mobility

Mobility and balance is measured during clinic visits using TUG (Timed up and go). The patient is asked to rise from a seated position, walk 3 m, turn around, and return and sit in the starting point chair while timed. Patients who fail to complete the test in fewer than 12 s are considered to have elevated fall risk Measurements will be taken every six months.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change in Patient Mobility
secondsStudy Participants
Baseline18.9 ± 9.1
6 months14.6 ± 4.9
12 months47.5 ± 7.8
SecondaryChange in Life Space Assessment Score

Life-space mobility is a measure of resilience to physical decline and social isolation in older adults. They are nine 'yes/no' questions regarding a person's movements across nine life-space zones in the preceding 3 days. The total score ranges from 0 to 9, where 0 means most restricted life-space and 9 is least restricted life-space.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Life Space Assessment Score
score on a scaleStudy Participants
Baseline7 ± 1.6
6 months3 ± 1.45
Other pre-specifiedNUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Fat

The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams fat will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

Time frame:
6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedNUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Kilocalories

The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of total kilocalories will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

Time frame:
6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedNUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Saturated Fat

The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams saturated fat will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

Time frame:
6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedNUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Sodium

The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of milligrams sodium will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

Time frame:
6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedNUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Added Sugar

The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams of added sugar will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

Time frame:
6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedNUTRITION Assessment by ASA24 Food Recall - Alcohol

The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool is a web-based tool that enables multiple, automatically coded self-administered 24-hour recalls. Participants are asked to report everything they ate or drank over the last 24-hours by using an online tool. Data collected on enrollment and 3 months and at 6 months. Intake of grams of alcohol will be tracked to see changes over the study period.

Time frame:
6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedHbA1c Values

HbA1c values reflects glycemic control. Lower values reflect greater glycemic control

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedTotal Cholesterol

Total cholesterol at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedTriglycerides

Triglycerides at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedLDL Values

LDL values at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedHDL Levels

HDL levels at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study Participants0/19 (0%)1/19 (5.3%)8/19 (42.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventStudy Participants
Shoulder injury due to fallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/19
Most frequent other events
Showing 5 of 6
Most frequent other events
EventStudy Participants
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/19
Acid RefluxGastrointestinal disorders2/19
Nausea/VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/19
IndigestionGastrointestinal disorders1/19
Hair LossSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/19

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Study Participants
Mean74.67 ± 5.686
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Participants
Female15
Male4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Participants
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino17
Unknown or Not Reported2
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Study Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American3
White14
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Study Participants
United States19
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Michigan - East Ann Arbor Geriatrics Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 3, 2025
  • Informed consent form · Jan 3, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Results
Results posted
posted Sep 25, 2026
Also revised
primary outcomes
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Results posted
    Primary outcomes Revised (8 changes)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, secondary outcomes and documents

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06624163
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Shenbagam Dewar (Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 2, 2024
Start date
Jun 8, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2025
Completion
Mar 17, 2026
Results posted
Sep 25, 2026
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion