CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06622746Updated Oct 2, 2024

Endoscopic Hand Suturing After Advanced Endoscopic Resections.

An observational study in Endoscopic Surgical Procedures, sponsored by Jagiellonian University. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-02.

Sponsored by Jagiellonian University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
31
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) has emerged as a promising modality in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. The available reports regarding its effectiveness in clinical practice are limited due to the relatively recent expansion of this method. This study aims to describe the single-center experience of EHS and its outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) has emerged as a promising modality in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. The available reports regarding its effectiveness in clinical practice are limited due to the relatively recent expansion of this method. This study aims to describe the single-center experience of EHS and its outcomes. The retrospective single-center study included individuals that underwent advanced endoscopic procedures in upper and lower GI tract followed by EHS. Defined features (suturing time, suturing speed) and outcomes (postprocedural bleeding, abdominal pain) were assessed. Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endoscopic Surgical Procedures

Keywords

  • Endoscopic Hand Suturing
  • Suturing Techniques
  • Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
  • Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Jagiellonian University is the lead sponsor of 156 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This retrospective single-center study included all individuals who underwent advanced endoscopic procedures followed by EHS from March 2023 to June 2024. Procedures were conducted both in the upper and lower GI tract and included endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD, EFTR, POEM, and STER. The EHS was performed to close a GI wall defect (after EMR, ESD, or EID) or the linear entry mucosal incision (after POEM or STER). The indications for additional suturing were high risk of bleeding following ESD in upper GI (based on patients' history of anticoagulant therapy and advanced age), closing the deep wall defect after EID in the rectum to improve recovery, closing the full-thickness defect after EFTR in cases of submucosal lesions, and concurrent treatment for perforation during ESD.

Inclusion criteria

  • all individuals who underwent advanced endoscopic procedures followed by EHS from March 2023 to June 2024.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • EHS

    All individuals who underwent advanced endoscopic procedures followed by EHS from March 2023 to June 2024

    Procedure: Endoscopic Hand Suturing

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic Hand Suturing

    Endoscopic Hand Suturing is a technique of the wound closure after advanced endoscopic third-space resections I the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. In this technique, the needle is held on the opposite side from the tip with the needle holder. The needle is pierced perpendicularly into the tissue at the side of the wound with an appropriate margin, then driven through the tissue with rotation and grasped at the bottom of the defect. The same steps are repeated from the middle of the wound to create a symmetrical structure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suturing time

    The time between delivering and retrieving the needle, in minutes.

    Time frame: From 1st of March 2023 to 30th of July 2024.

  2. Suturing speed

    Calculated by dividing the longitudinal length of the defect in millimeters by the suturing time in minutes.

    Time frame: From 1st of March 2023 to 30th of July 2024.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postprocedural bleeding rate

    The prevalence of the symptoms of gastrointestinal bleeding.

    Time frame: From 1st of March 2023 to 30th of July 2024.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jagiellonian University
    Cracovia, Lesser Poland 31007, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Goto O, Oyama T, Ono H, Takahashi A, Fujishiro M, Saito Y, Abe S, Kaise M, Iwakiri K, Yahagi N. Endoscopic hand-suturing is feasible, safe, and may reduce bleeding risk after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter pilot study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 May;91(5):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.046. Epub 2020 Jan 7. PubMed 31923410 ↗
  • Akimoto T, Goto O, Sasaki M, Mizutani M, Tsutsumi K, Kiguchi Y, Takatori Y, Nakayama A, Kato M, Fujimoto A, Ochiai Y, Maehata T, Kaise M, Iwakiri K, Yahagi N. Endoscopic hand suturing for mucosal defect closure after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection may reduce the risk of postoperative bleeding in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):123-132. doi: 10.1111/den.14045. Epub 2021 Jun 22. PubMed 34021512 ↗
  • Uozumi T, Abe S, Mizuguchi Y, Sekiguchi M, Toyoshima N, Takamaru H, Yamada M, Kobayashi N, Sadachi R, Ito S, Takada K, Kishida Y, Imai K, Hotta K, Ono H, Saito Y. Endoscopic hand suturing using a modified through-the-scope needle holder for mucosal closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Prospective multicenter study (with video). Dig Endosc. 2024 Nov;36(11):1245-1252. doi: 10.1111/den.14808. Epub 2024 May 22. PubMed 38775419 ↗
  • Akimoto T, Goto O, Sasaki M, Mizutani M, Tsutsumi K, Kiguchi Y, Nakayama A, Kato M, Fujimoto A, Ochiai Y, Maehata T, Kaise M, Iwakiri K, Yahagi N. Endoscopic suturing promotes healing of mucosal defects after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: endoscopic and histologic analyses in in vivo porcine models (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 May;91(5):1172-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.032. Epub 2020 Jan 3. PubMed 31904381 ↗
  • Abe S, Saito Y, Tanaka Y, Ego M, Yanagisawa F, Kawashima K, Takamaru H, Sekiguchi M, Yamada M, Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Goto O, Yahagi N. A novel endoscopic hand-suturing technique for defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2020 Sep;52(9):780-785. doi: 10.1055/a-1120-8533. Epub 2020 Mar 23. PubMed 32207119 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — We intend to share the encrypted data with other investigators after appropriate application and approval of the study chair.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06622746
Lead sponsor
Jagiellonian University
Responsible party
Zofia Orzeszko (MD, Jagiellonian University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 2, 2024
Start date
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2024
Completion
Aug 30, 2024
Last update
Oct 2, 2024

Study contacts

Michal Spychalski, PhD
study chair · Center of Bowel Treatment
Zofia Orzeszko, PhD
principal investigator · Jagiellonian University in Cracow

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion