CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06622083Updated May 15, 2025

Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Learning Outcomes

An interventional study of Education and Education and Aerobic exercise in Learning Outcome, Pelvic Floor and Student, sponsored by Izmir University of Economics. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 22 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Sponsored by Izmir University of Economics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 22 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Most studies have reported that physical activity positively affects memory, observation, problem-solving, decision-making, and specific skills (e.g., reading and mathematics). From an acute perspective, a single exercise session performed before, during, and after a learning task has been shown to improve various memory and executive functions (e.g., decision-making, goal planning, task switching). A meta-analysis indicated that exercise performed close to learning tasks enhances short-term memory (e.g., information that disappears within a few seconds) and long-term memory (e.g., information recalled after long time delays). Practical training is necessary in physiotherapy education programs. Practical training includes laboratory work at school, profession-related projects, and clinical internships. Practical work learning prepares students for their profession, job roles, and professional identity. Furthermore, increasing practical applications, such as assessment and practice on models, will also enhance problem-based learning. Therefore, new approaches that enhance learning in practical training in the field of physiotherapy and rehabilitation may contribute to the development of knowledgeable and qualified physiotherapists.

In this context, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of a single session of aerobic exercise before a lecture on pelvic floor rehabilitation, which includes practical methods, on the learning outcomes of the course.

02

Conditions studied

  • Learning Outcome
  • Pelvic Floor
  • Student
  • Education
  • Aerobic Exercises
  • Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Izmir University of Economics is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 22 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Being a Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation student
  • Not having taken a course/training on pelvic floor rehabilitation,
  • Being between the ages of 18-22,
  • Being a volunteer,
  • Being literate in Turkish.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Those with a high metabolic aerobic threshold according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (3000 METs and above),
  • Students who answered "Yes" to any of the 7 questions in the General Health Questions section of the Exercise Readiness for All Questionnaire,
  • Those with a history of neurological disease or epilepsy,
  • Those with problems that prevent participation in exercise such as hypertension or other cardiovascular diseases.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Education group

    Participants in this group will receive 40 minutes of both theoretical and practical education.

    Other: Education

  • Experimental
    Education and Aerobic exercise group

    Participants in the exercise group will undergo an aerobic exercise program Following the exercise, participants will receive 40 minutes of both theoretical and practical education.

    Other: Education and Aerobic exercise

Interventions

  • OtherEducation

    Students in both groups will be given 40 minutes of both theoretical and practical training on the anatomy of the pelvic floor, its contraction mechanism, function and dysfunctions, evaluation and physiotherapy and rehabilitation. Theoretical training will be given through presentation and question-answer techniques containing this information, and practical training will be given through a pelvic model and gynecological examination simulator.

  • OtherEducation and Aerobic exercise

    Participants in the exercise group will undergo an aerobic exercise program using the Monark 938E Nova Ergometer and software before the training session. The bike operates with its computer software integrated with the ECG system. The aerobic exercise program will consist of 3-5 minutes of warm-up, 20 minutes of exercise, and 3-5 minutes of cool-down, performed at a moderate intensity. During the exercise session, heart rate will be recorded every 5 minutes using a Polar ECG sensor connected via Bluetooth to the 938E Nova Ergometer, while perceived exertion will be measured using Borg's 6-20 rating scale

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge Test score

    The Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge Test (PFHKT) will be used to assess the pelvic floor knowledge level of the students participating in the study. The PFHKT was developed by Çelenay Toprak, and its Turkish validity was assessed through face validity, content validity, and construct validity analyses. The PFHKT, designed to measure participants; knowledge of pelvic floor health, consists of 29 items. The test uses a dichotomous scoring system where correct answers are scored as 1; and incorrect or unknown answers are scored 0. The minimum score is 0; and the maximum score is 29. As the score increases, the individuals knowledge of pelvic floor health also increases.

    Time frame: 1 week after the intervention

  2. Change in Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge Test score

    The Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge Test (PFHKT) will be used to assess the pelvic floor knowledge level of the students participating in the study. The PFHKT was developed by Çelenay Toprak, and its Turkish validity was assessed through face validity, content validity, and construct validity analyses. The PFHKT, designed to measure participants; knowledge of pelvic floor health, consists of 29 items. The test uses a dichotomous scoring system where correct answers are scored as 1; and incorrect or unknown answers are scored 0. The minimum score is 0; and the maximum score is 29. As the score increases, the individuals knowledge of pelvic floor health also increases.

    Time frame: after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of 10 points determined on the pelvis model

    Ten points will be marked on the pelvic model, and participants will be asked to correctly write the specified points.

    Time frame: at baseline

  2. Evaluation of 10 points determined on the pelvis model

    Ten points will be marked on the pelvic model, and participants will be asked to correctly write the specified points.

    Time frame: after the intervention

  3. Evaluation of 10 points determined on the pelvis model

    Ten points will be marked on the pelvic model, and participants will be asked to correctly write the specified points.

    Time frame: 1 week after the intervention

  4. Evaluation of digital palpation on the model

    Digital palpation will be evaluated on the gynecological examination simulator (Can and Cannot Apply).

    Time frame: at baseline

  5. Evaluation of digital palpation on the model

    Digital palpation will be evaluated on the gynecological examination simulator (Can and Cannot Apply).

    Time frame: after the intervention

  6. Evaluation of digital palpation on the model

    Digital palpation will be evaluated on the gynecological examination simulator (Can and Cannot Apply).

    Time frame: 1 week after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Izmir University of Economics
    İzmir, Balçova 35330, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06622083
Lead sponsor
Izmir University of Economics
Responsible party
Seda Yakit Yesilyurt (Assistant Prof., Izmir University of Economics) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2025
Completion
May 10, 2025
Last update
May 15, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion