An interventional study of Accelerated radiotherapy and Conventional radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma HNSCC, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.
Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether accelerated radiotherapy (involving 6 treatments per week) is better than standard radiotherapy (involving 5 treatments per week) at treating cancer of the head and neck when initiated more than 6 weeks after surgery.
This study is a randomized trial designed to determine the effect of Accelerated Fractionation (AF) versus Conventional Fractionation (CF) PORT on locoregional recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and treatment package time in participants with resected intermediate and high-risk Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) planned to start Post Operative Radiotherapy (PORT) greater than six weeks after surgery. Eligible participants in both cohorts will be randomized 1:1 to receive five fractions per week of standard conventional fractionation radiotherapy or six fractions per week of accelerated fractionation radiotherapy. If randomized to the standard conventional fractionation group, participants will be treated with five fractions of radiation per week, received daily. If randomized to the accelerated fractionation group, participants will be treated with 6 fractions of radiotherapy per week, received daily and twice daily treatments on one day of the week.
2,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 551 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 75 is above the median of 47 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.
Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.
Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Planned for curative intent postoperative radiotherapy based on pathologic risk factors.
Exclusion Criteria:
5 fractions per week, daily treatment Monday-Friday; dosage at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist per standard of care
Radiation: Conventional radiotherapy
6 fractions per week, daily treatment plus twice daily treatment for 1 day Monday-Friday; dosage at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist per standard of care
Radiation: Accelerated radiotherapy
6 fractions per week, BID fractions one day per week
5 fractions per week, daily M-F
Locoregional Recurrence-free Survival
Time to locoregional recurrence, will be assessed on an intention to treat basis using a one-sided log rank test to compare hazard rates between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will also be generated with locoregional failure or death as the event of interest and last clinical disease assessment as a right-censor.
Time frame: 2 years post radiotherapy
Progression free survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival will be calculated from the time of randomization to disease recurrence or death from any cause as the event and last follow-up as a right-censor. It will be compared between treatment arms.
Time frame: up to 5 years
Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival will be calculated from the time of randomization to death from any cause, with last follow-up as a right-censor.
Time frame: up to 5 years
Acute and late toxicities
Acute and late toxicities between each treatment arm will be measured by evaluating adverse events (AEs) by grade in each treatment arm. Using the Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test if cell frequencies \<5) and a significance level of 0.05, comparisons will be made of the following outcomes between treatment arms: 1) the number of participants with at least one AE of grade 3 or higher, 2) the number of participants with grade 1 or higher toxicity, and 3) the number of patients with grade 3 or higher toxicity. Each of these analyses will result in the construction of 2x2 tables thus the use of the Chi-Square (or Fisher's exact test) will be appropriate. These analyses will be completed for both acute (between RT start and 90 days after RT) and late (more than 90 days after RT completion) toxicities.
Time frame: up to 24 months post radiotherapy
Patient Report Outcomes (PRO) - PRO-CTCAE
PRO-CTCAE measure of toxicity will be assessed by describing the counts and frequencies for the worst score observed in each participant in the whole cohort and by treatment arm. Using the Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test if cell frequencies \<5) and a significance level of 0.05, a comparison will occur of the following outcomes between treatment arms: 1) the number of patients with at least one PRO-CTCAE score of grade 1 or higher, and 2) the number of patients with at least one PRO-CTCAE score of grade 3 or higher. These comparisons 1 and 2 will be completed for both acute (between RT start and 90 days after RT) and late (more than 90 days after RT completion) toxicities. The analysis of change in PRO-CTCAE score over time will also be performed using a likelihood-based Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) approach.
Time frame: at baseline, end radiotherapy (RT), 3, 6, 12, and 24-months post RT
Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) - MDASI-HN
The MDASI-HN is a 28-item measure with three subscales: the 13 core MDASI items, 9 head and neck cancer-specific items, and 6 items specific to interference in daily life by the patient's symptoms. The change from baseline at each time point will be summarized using mean and standard deviation at end RT, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months post RT.
Time frame: at End of Radiotherapy (RT), 3, 6, 12, and 24-months post RT
Nutritional Toxicity
Nutritional toxicity will be measured by comparing the rates of reactive gastrostomy tube placement using a Fisher's exact test. For patients in whom a feeding tube is placed, the duration of tube will be defined as the time from tube placement to removal or last follow-up with a tube (right-censor) and will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank statistics.
Time frame: up to 24 months post Radiotherapy
Time to initiation of Postoperative Radiotherapy (PORT)
Time to initiation of PORT will be calculated as the number of days from date of primary curative resection (surgery date = day 0) to initiation of RT. This value will be compared between groups using a 2-sample t-test to see if there is a significant difference between groups on this covariate.
Time frame: up to 16 weeks
Treatment package time
The treatment package time will be calculated as the number of days from the primary surgical resection to the end of PORT (the last RT treatment for participants who complete therapy; for participants who do not complete the prescribed course of RT, this metric is moot) and compared between groups using a 2-sample T-test. The proportion of patients with treatment package time less than 100 days will be determined and compared between groups using the Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test if cell frequencies \<5).
Time frame: from surgical resection to end of PORT - up to approx. 165 days
Demographic characteristics of eligible participants
The characteristics (age, gender assigned at birth, race, ethnicity) of potentially eligible participants will be described using count and frequency for categorical variables and mean (standard deviation) and median (range) for continuous variables. These factors will be compared between groups who do and do not enroll on study using the Chi-square tests for categorical and 2-sample t-tests for continuous measures. For participants who choose not to enroll, the reasons and rationale provided to support that decision will be described using count and frequency.
Time frame: Prior to Radiotherapy (Pre-screening and baseline)
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences