An interventional study of Zirconomer and Nanohybrid composite in Contact Tightness in Restoring Proximal Surfaces in Posterior Teeth, sponsored by Cairo University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.
Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
To achieve an optimal contact area is essential to avoid tooth migration, food impaction, and the occurrence of secondary caries. However, proximal restorations constitute challenge for the professional and tight contact points are difficult to obtain depending not only on tools used, but also on type of restorative material. Current tooth-colored restorative materials are not condensable and there is shrinkage with setting. The aim of this study is to compare the proximal contact tightness of zirconia reinforced glass ionomer versus conventional nanohybrid resin composite when used in class II cavities.
Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.
Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Eligibility Criteria of participants:
Inclusion Criteria of participants:
Exclusion criteria of participants:
Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular joint disorders.
b- Eligibility Criteria of teeth:
Inclusion Criteria of teeth:
Exclusion criteria of the teeth:
Zirconia modified glass ionomer restorative material
Procedure: Zirconomer
Conventionally used aesthetic restorations in class II
Procedure: Nanohybrid composite
zirconia modified glass ionomer
conventional composite
Contact Tightness
Measuring the adequacy of proximal contact restoration using intervention \' zirconomer\" versus control which is Nanohybrid resin composite. Heaviness of this contact using Modified USPHS criteria. USPHS criteria are standardized in which a dental floss is used. Contact tightness can have one of three scores: Alpha Bravo Charlie
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Cairo University