CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06594770Updated Oct 15, 2024

Time of Treatment in HALL Technique Vs ART

An interventional study of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall technique in Healthy, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 6 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2024, 2 years ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the time of treatment of Hall Technique versus Atraumatic Restorative Technique in the management of carious primary molars. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the Hall Technique provide a faster and pain-free treatment compared to ART?
  • How do the outcomes of both techniques impact children's acceptance and behavior? Researchers will compare the Hall Technique, which uses preformed metal crowns without caries removal, to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, which uses hand instruments to selectively remove carious tissue.

Participants will:

  • Receive treatment using either the Hall Technique or ART in a single session.
  • Attend follow-up visits to monitor the effectiveness and acceptance of the treatment.
  • Complete assessments on their experience and comfort during and after the procedure.
02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: From 4 to 6 years.
  • Caries in primary molars within enamel/dentin with vital pulp.
  • Healthy children.
  • Cooperative children

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of signs and symptoms of necrosis.
  • Root caries.
  • History of spontaneous pain.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ART

    Procedure: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

  • Active comparator
    HALL technique

    Procedure: Hall technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureAtraumatic Restorative Treatment

    A sharp excavator will be used to remove soft demineralized carious tissue from the patient\'s primary molar 2-The molar will then be restored with capsulated Glass Ionomer in accordance to ART procedure. 3-Each capsule will be mixed for ten seconds and used for restoring teeth isolated by cotton rolls. 4-After the cement is cured, excess material will be removed with an excavator and a carver. 5-The occlusion will be tested for interferences with carbon paper. A layer of varnish coat will be applied to the surface and light-cured for 20 seconds .

  • ProcedureHall technique

    The procedure involves assessing the occlusion, contact points, and tooth shape. If contact points are present, orthodontic separators will be placed between the primary molars to create space for crown fitting, with the child seated upright to maintain airway safety. After 3 to 5 days, the separators will be removed, and loose plaque and debris will be cleared. The correct crown size will be selected, ensuring it doesn't impinge on adjacent teeth, and will be filled with glass ionomer cement. The child will be instructed to bite down for two minutes to ensure proper seating. Excess cement will be removed, and contacts will be flossed. Any initial occlusal discrepancies are expected to resolve within weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. time of treatment

    Time will be measured from the start of the procedure till its end using digital chronometer as a device and minutes as a unit.

    Time frame: during the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain and discomfort

    Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child will be recorded using the Face Pain Scale - revised (FPS-R), which has six numbered faces from 0 to10 The (FPS-R). Each child will be asked to mark the face that reflects her or his experienced pain during the treatment. There is no pain visible on this face \[indicating the face on the far left\]. As you move from left to right, the faces get progressively more painful until you reach this one, which is incredibly painful \[indicating the face on the far right\]. The (FPS-R) faces will be scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.

    Time frame: immediately after the procedure , 3month ,6 month and 12 month

  2. Child behavior

    At the end of the treatment session, the dentist classifies the child's behavior during the treatment according to Venham Behavior Rating Scale is a reliable system for rating behavior of children in the dental setting. ratings will be scored as 0-1-2-3-4-5

    Time frame: during the procedure

  3. Canine overbite: HT

    the canine overbite will be measured only for the hall technique group. The canine overbite will be measured before the procedure using a Boley Gauge, either on the same side or the opposite side if the canine is missing. After assessing tooth shape and occlusion, a stainless-steel crown (SSC) will be partially seated on the tooth with glass ionomer cement. The child will bite on a cotton roll to fully seat the crown, after which excess cement will be removed, and the overbite will be recorded immediately after treatment.

    Time frame: preoperatively , immediately after the procedure , 3 month , 6 month, 12 month

  4. Child anxiety

    At the end of the treatment session, the dentist classifies the child's anxiety during the treatment according to Venham Anxiety Rating Scale is a reliable system for rating anxiety of children in the dental setting. ratings will be scored as 0-1-2-3-4-5

    Time frame: during the procedure

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06594770
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Doaa Mohamed Khalil (principal investigator, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Study contacts

Doaa mohamed mustafa
Contact
doaa.mustafa@dentistry.cu.eud.eg
00201550150989

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion