CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06591000Updated Sep 19, 2024

Clinical Efficacy and Long-term Outcomes of ALLOgraft Versus Stented Biological Prosthesis for Primary TRIcuspid Valve Disease (ALLOTRI)

An observational study in Allograft, Bioprosthesis and Tricuspid Valve Disease, sponsored by Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2016; still recruiting 10 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
56
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate early safety, clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes of mitral allografts and stented biological prosthesis in tricuspid valve replacement for primary tricuspid valve diseases.

Read the detailed description

Early safety (morbidity, mortality rate, freedom from any valve related complication) along with clinical efficacy ( survival, freedom from reoperation, repeat endocarditis and other valve related complication ), long term outcomes ( survival, freedom from reoperation, repeat endocarditis and other valve related complication ), echocardiografic assessment and MSCT scan for both groups of patients are going to be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allograft
  • Bioprosthesis
  • Tricuspid Valve Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with primary tricuspid valve disease and/or tricuspid bioprosthetic failure scheduled for tricuspid valve intervention

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with primary tricuspid valve disease and/or tricuspid bioprosthetic failure scheduled for tricuspid valve intervention.

    • Intraoperative findings suggested for tricuspid valve replacement rather than repair.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy

    • Confirmed active drug addiction
    • Progressive HIV-infection
    • HIV-infected patients with CD4-cells count less than 250
    • Patients with secondary tricuspid valve pathology (left-sided valve disease)
    • LV Ejection fraction less than 40%
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
56 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Allograft tricuspid valve replacement

    Patients underwent mitral allograft implantation for primary tricuspid valve disease

    Procedure: tricuspid valve replacement

  • Stented biological tricuspid valve replacement

    Patients underwent biological stented valve replacement for primary tricuspid valve disease

    Procedure: tricuspid valve replacement

Interventions

  • Proceduretricuspid valve replacement

    Complete or partial tricuspid valve replacement with mitral allograft/ complete tricuspid valve replacement with biological prosthesis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Freedom from all-cause mortality (%)

    Time frame: 30-day period after surgery

  2. Stroke

    Stroke rate (n,%)

    Time frame: 30-day period after surgery

  3. Severe valve dysfunction

    Number of patients free from peak valve gradient more than 6 mmHg and severe valve regurgitation (vena contracta no more than 6 mm), (n,%)

    Time frame: 1-year after surgery, annually, assessed up to 3 years

  4. Freedom from prosthetic endocarditis

    Number of patients free from prosthetic endocarditis (n,%)

    Time frame: 1-year after surgery, annually, assessed up to 3 years

  5. Freedom from reoperation

    Number of patients free from secondary operation due to severe valve (n,%) dysfunction (n,%)

    Time frame: 1-year after surgery, annually, assessed up to 3 years

  6. New pacemaker implantation

    Number of patients, free from pacemaker implantation after surgery (n,%)

    Time frame: 1-year after surgery, annually, assessed up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Transvalvular gradient

    Peak and mean gradient (mmHg)

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery, annually, assessed up to 3 years

  2. Transprosthetic regurgitation

    Vena contracta (mm)

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery, annually, assessed up to 3 years

  3. Right atrial remodeling

    right atrium size (mm)

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery, annually, assessed up to 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Cardiac Surgery
    Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
    • Yuri Malinovsky · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06591000
Lead sponsor
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Responsible party
Mikhail Nuzhdin (Director, Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Jan 14, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 14, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 14, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Mikhail Nuzhdin, PhD
Contact
austesla2022@gmail.com
0079068608612
Yuri Malinovsky, PhD
Contact
mikhailnuzhdin@hotmail.com
0073517493732
Yuri Malinovsky, PhD
study chair · Department of Cardiac Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion