ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06579885MPOX-EYEUpdated Mar 12, 2026

Ocular Complications of Mpox in the Democratic Republic Congo

An observational study in Monkeypox and Mpox (Monkeypox), sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium. Completed at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-12.

Sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational study in which patients diagnosed with mpox will be enrolled, will undergo standard ophthalmological examinations of their eyes to see if there are any complications of mpox. The study will primarily assess the presence of ophthalmological signs and symptoms at enrollment.

Read the detailed description

This is an observational study in which patients diagnosed with mpox will be enrolled in two clinics in remote settings in the DR Congo (Tunda and Kole general hospital) where mpox outbreaks are ongoing. After providing informed consent, participants will undergo standard ophthalmological examinations of their eyes to see if there are any complications of mpox. This includes history taking, clinical examination, technical examinations such as a dilated fundoscopic exam, a fluorescein test and a Schirmer test, and a conjunctival swab for tear collection for monkeypox virus (MPXV) detection. Pictures of the anterior and posterior segment will also be taken to aid later verification and interpretation of the study findings. If they are hospitalised for mpox (for clinical reasons or as part of their participation in another ongoing clinical trial at the study sites), they will be followed up for 14 days and examined during an unscheduled visit in the case of new or worsening severe issues. Otherwise, patients are followed up at day 14 (for those hospitalised), day 28 and day 59. Study participants will receive the same supportive eye care as non-study participants. Study participants will be compensated for their time lost and for transportation to the clinic.

The study will primarily assess the presence of ophthalmological signs and symptoms at enrollment, but also aims to describe the complications of mpox that may arise after that point in time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Monkeypox
  • Mpox (Monkeypox)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ophthalmology
  • complications
03

In context

Mpox, Monkeypox

72 studies on the registry are indexed under Mpox, Monkeypox; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 320 is above the median of 224 across 34 observational studies indexed under Mpox, Monkeypox.

Browse Mpox, Monkeypox studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will take place in parallel to:

  • the PALM007 clinical trial (NCT05559099), which evaluates the efficacy of tecovirimat for the treatment of mpox in two sites in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Tunda General Hospital, Maniema Province and Kole General Hospital, Sankuru Province.
  • The MBOTE study, which evaluates the clinical signs and symptoms in people with mpox at Kamituga General Hospital, South Kivu Province.

Depending on the mpox epidemiological context other sites can be included at a later timepoint. The study may be continued after cessation of the PALM007 trial.

Participants will be recruited among PCR-confirmed mpox cases, including but not limited to patients enrolled in the PALM 007 trial and MBOTE study. The study may be continued after cessation of the PALM007 trial and MBOTE study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient of any age or gender with laboratory-confirmed infection with MPXV
  • Laboratory confirmation of MPXV infection less than 48 hours before inclusion
  • Patient or culturally acceptable representative is willing and able to give or assent for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for whom, in the judgment of the recruiting physician, participation in the study would interfere with routine optimal clinical care.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite presence or absence of eye disease and visual deficiencies at presentation

    Composite presence of * orbital lesions (exophthalmos, enophthalmos, oculomotor paralysis...) * affection of the adnexa * affection of the anterior segment * affection of the posterior segment * affection of the optic nerve

    Time frame: At enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ocular signs & symptoms at presentation and during follow-up

    Presence or absence of individual symptoms and signs over time

    Time frame: From enrollment until last follow-up

  2. Visual acuity at presentation and during follow-up

    Result of Optotype letters/numbers and/or E test over time

    Time frame: From enrollment until last follow-up

  3. presence of MPXV in tear fluid at presentation and during follow-up

    Result of MPXV-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) on conjunctival swabs over time

    Time frame: From enrollment until last follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kamituga General Hospital
    Kamituga, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2024 to primary completion in Aug 2025, 10 months.

Of 23 observational studies under Mpox, Monkeypox, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45. This study's 10 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 29, 2024
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
StartActual
Oct 28, 2024
Primary completionActual
Aug 29, 2025
CompletionActual
Aug 29, 2025
Last update
Mar 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06579885
Collaborators
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale. Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
Start date
Oct 28, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2025
Completion
Aug 29, 2025
Last update
Mar 12, 2026

Study contacts

Laurens Liesenborghs, Professor
study director · Institute of Tropical Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion