ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06578624Updated Nov 9, 2026

Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of SA53-OS in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of SA53-OS (phase 1) and SA53-OS (phase 2) in Solid Tumor, sponsored by Lamassu Bio Inc. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Lamassu Bio Inc · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Updated Nov 9, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of SA53-OS in adult participants with refractory solid tumors.

The study is comprised of 2 parts: Part 1 called dose escalation, and Part 2a called dose expansion. This study starts with Part 1 where participants who are diagnosed with advanced or metastatic solid tumor cancers receive different doses of SA53-OS (starting with the lowest dose) to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SA53-OS. Once the MTD of SA53-OS is known, the study continues to Part 2a where participants who are diagnosed with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD LPS) or other solid tumor cancers will receive SA53-OS at the MTD.

The study drug, SA53-OS, will be administered for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks as an oral solution for up to 2 years.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase 1/2a, open-label, dose escalation study conducted in adult participants with p53 wild-type refractory solid tumors. The study will assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of SA53-OS a novel MDM2 inhibitor capable of selective activation of p53. This enables the p53 tumor suppressor protein to selectively facilitate tumor cell death and growth inhibition.

The study drug, SA53-OS, will be administered for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks as an oral solution. Phase 1 will consist of a dose escalation study to establish a candidate recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Phase 2a will enroll 2 expansion cohorts to establish any preliminary efficacy of SA53-OS in participants with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD LPS) with MDM2 amplifications and other p53 wild-type solid tumors as a single agent.

Phase 1 dose escalation:

Escalating doses of SA53-OS will be provided to participants with p53 wild-type refractory solid tumors to determine the RP2D. The MTD is the highest dose of a drug or treatment that does not cause unacceptable side effects in the first cycle. The RP2D considers all available safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy data including, the frequency, severity, and manageability of toxicities occurring after Cycle 1.

Phase 1 of the study will start with dose escalation by 2-fold (i.e., 2x preceding dose level) in cohorts of a single participant until Grade 2 or greater toxicity is observed.

When a single Grade 2 or higher toxicity is observed, 3+3 multi-participant cohorts will be treated at the dose in which the Grade 2 or higher toxicity was observed by enrolling another 2 participants at this dose. The 3+3 multi-participant cohorts will follow the standard 3+3 paradigm based on occurrence of any DLT with 50% dose escalation until the MTD is identified.

Phase 2a dose expansion:

The purpose of Phase 2a of the study is to describe any preliminary evidence of efficacy from SA53-OS monotherapy in participants with DD LPS or other p53 wild-type or MDM2 amplified solid tumors. Phase 2a will also be used to confirm the safety and tolerability of the candidate RP2D of SA53-OS determined in Phase 1 of the study, to further describe the toxicity and pharmacokinetics profiles of SA53-OS, and to assess potential biomarkers of sensitivity resistance, and toxicity.

Participants will continue to receive study treatment until either: 1) disease progression; 2) occurrence of unacceptable treatment-related toxicity as per participant or Investigator discretion; 3) the maximum of 2 years of treatment has been reached; or 4) other reason(s) for study treatment discontinuation. In the case of complete response, treatment should be continued for at least 6 months if no other stopping criteria are met, and further treatment can be recommended at the investigator's discretion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Solid Tumor

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • p53 wild-type tumor
  • liposarcoma
  • MDM2 inhibitor
  • solid tumors
  • dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD LPS)
  • p53
  • Advanced or metastatic solid tumors
03

In context

Liposarcoma

160 studies on the registry are indexed under Liposarcoma; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 55 is close to the median of 52 across 136 interventional studies indexed under Liposarcoma.

Browse Liposarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Lamassu Bio Inc as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Tumor characteristics of participants in Phase 1

    1. and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced or solid tumor and/or non-Hodgkin lymphoma excluding primary central nervous system for which no standard effective treatment exists or where that treatment was declined. Participants with non-Hodgkin lymphoma should have failed ≥ 2 prior enrollment.
    2. Tumor p53 wild-type.
  • Tumor characteristics of participants in Phase 2a

    1. Cohort A: Tumor p53 wild-type with histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced or metastatic DD LPS (and MDM2 amplification); OR Cohort B: Tumor p53 wild-type in other solid tumor.
    2. by 1.1.
  • 18 years old or older.
  • Resolution of toxicity-related to prior anticancer therapies prior to receipt of study treatment to Grade 1 or less.
  • (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Participants of childbearing/ must agree to use adequate measures during the course of the trial and for at least 3 months after discontinuing study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated need for major surgery and/or localized palliative radiation within the next 6 weeks
  • Active, untreated central nervous system . Participants with identified at Screening may be rescreened after the lesion(s) have been appropriately treated; participants with treated brain metastases should be neurologically stable for 4 weeks post-treatment and prior to study enrollment, and off for at least 2 weeks before start of study treatment, and treated lesions should demonstrate no new growth on the re-screening scan.
  • Known infection or active or C infection.
  • Thrombotic event requiring active and ongoing anticoagulation within the last 6 months prior to study treatment.
  • Myocardial infarction within the last 6 months prior to study treatment.
  • Significant cardiovascular disease including unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmia, congestive heart failure (NYHA) Class III or IV related to primary cardiac disease, uncontrolled ischemic or severe vascular heart disease.
  • A history of additional risk factors for Torsades de Pointes (TdP) (e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of Long Syndrome)
  • Known bleeding disorder (e.g., hemophilia, von Willebrand disease).
  • Conditions that may predispose to major bleeding (e.g., active GI ulcers, upper or lower GI bleedings in the last 6 months, significant hemoptysis in the last 6 months, tumor invasion of major vessels, etc.). Conditions that have been treated may be allowed if resolution of the risk is documented.
  • Use or indication for full dose anticoagulation or anti- therapy including low dose aspirin.
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
55 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phase 1

    Dose escalation phase

    Drug: SA53-OS (phase 1)

  • Experimental
    Phase 2

    Cohort A: DDLPS (MDM2 amplified and p53 wild-type) Cohort B: other p53 wild-type solid tumors

    Drug: SA53-OS (phase 2)

Interventions

  • DrugSA53-OS (phase 1)

    Dose escalation phase in which participants receive SA53-OS on 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks for a maximum of 2 years. Single participant cohorts will be enrolled until a Grade 2 or greater toxicity is observed and then 3+3 multi-participant cohorts will be enrolled until the MTD is identified.

  • DrugSA53-OS (phase 2)

    Dose expansion phase in which participants receive SA53-OS on 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks for a maximum of 2 years at the MTD identified in phase 1.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 1: Incidence of DLT

    Incidence of DLT in Cycle 1 (Day 1 to 21)

    Time frame: 21 days

  2. Phase 1 and 2: Adverse events

    Frequency of adverse events

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 1: Peak plasma concentration

    Determine the pharmacokinetic profile of SA53-OS (Cmax)

    Time frame: Day 4

  2. Phase 1: Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve between 0 and 24 hours

    Determine the pharmacokinetic profile of SA53-OS (AUC0-24)

    Time frame: Day 4

  3. Phase 1: Half-life

    Determine the pharmacokinetic profile of SA53-OS (T1/2)

    Time frame: Day 4

  4. Phase 2: Objective response rate (ORR)

    Participants achieving ORR defined as complete response (CR) rate plus partial response (PR) rate. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

  5. Phase 2: Progression free survival (PFS)

    Participants not meeting the definition for progressive disease

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

  6. Phase 2: Overall survival

    To evaluate overall survival

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

  7. Phase 2: Duration of response

    Duration of response will be evaluated in responders

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

  8. Phase 2: Complete response rate

    Participants achieving CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

  9. Phase 2: Stable disease rate

    Participants achieving stable disease defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease.

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

  10. Phase 2: Disease control rate

    Participants achieving CR + PR + stable disease

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2031, 72 months after the start.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 9, 2026: start Mar 2025 → Jun 2025, primary completion Dec 2026 → Jul 2031 and completion Dec 2028 → Aug 2031.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 15, 2024
First posted
Aug 29, 2024
StartActual
Jun 16, 2025was Mar 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2031was Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2031was Dec 2028
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Mar 10, 2025→Jun 16, 2025
Nov 9, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026→Jul 1, 2031
Nov 9, 2026
Study completion
Dec 2028→Aug 1, 2031
Nov 9, 2026
Enrollment
70→55
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Start date Mar 10, 2025→Jun 16, 2025
    Primary completion Dec 2026→Jul 1, 2031
    Study completion Dec 2028→Aug 1, 2031
    Enrollment 70→55
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06578624
Lead sponsor
Lamassu Bio Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 29, 2024
Start date
Jun 16, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Jill Palmenberg
Contact
jill.palmenberg@lamassubio.com
520-241-5944
Gabi Hanna, MD
study director · Lamassu Bio

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion