ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06568380VIROYSTERUpdated Aug 23, 2024

Validation of a Boindicator as Monitoring Tool for Oyster Norovirus Outbreak

An interventional study of Oyster consumption in Gastroenteritis Norovirus, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Withdrawn at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-23.

Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Why this study was withdrawn
study abandoned before authorization obtained
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Noroviruses are responsible for 700M of annual cases of gastroenteritis, of which 15M are directly related to the consumption of contaminated food, including oysters. Current regulations do not require control of human noroviruses in shellfish. However, an ISO standard recommended to detect their genome in high-risk foodstuffs. However, presence of viral genome doesn't testify to the presence of infectious particles. Routine application of this standard would therefore wrongly lead to the withdrawal of shellfish from market, since norovirus genomes are widely found in the environment and in food without indicating a viral risk. Given the difficulty of cultivating human noroviruses in vitro and thus of discriminating infectious particles from non-infectious particles only based on genome detection, it is necessary to identify an indicator of the infectious nature of these pathogenic viruses. To be suitable, the indicator must first be associated with the presence of norovirus genome in the environment. This is the case of fecal bacteriophage F-specific RNA. Since bacteriophages are cultivable in the laboratory, it is easy to estimate the proportion of genomes of these bacteriophages corresponding to infectious particles. To confirm this indicator, it is necessary to demonstrate a relationship between the presence of infectious bacteriophages with that of infectious norovirus. This is only estimable by the occurrence of a gastroenteritis after consumption of a contaminated food by humans. We propose this randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the incidence of norovirus infection after consumption of oysters free from or containing infectious F-specific RNA bacteriophages.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if norovirus infections incidence is significantly weak after the consumption of oysters free of F-specific infectious RNA bacteriophages, compared to the consumption of oysters containing these same infectious bacteriophages.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroenteritis Norovirus

Browse trials for

03

In context

Gastroenteritis

237 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroenteritis; 16 are open to participants now.

Browse Gastroenteritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Central Hospital, Nancy, France is the lead sponsor of 798 studies on the registry; 186 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • signed
  • Health status
  • No seafood allergy
  • Nancy city residents

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent gastroenteritis (\<6 months)
  • Fragile health person proximity
  • Oysters consumption during the study
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • "nonsecretor" phenotype
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Noro+ Phage+

    Oysters positives for both norovirus genome and infectious bacteriophages

    Other: Oyster consumption

  • Experimental
    Noro+ Phage-

    Oysters positives for norovirus genome and negatives for infectious bacteriophages

    Other: Oyster consumption

  • Experimental
    Noro- Phage+

    Oysters negatives for norovirus genome and positives for infectious bacteriophages

    Other: Oyster consumption

  • Placebo comparator
    Noro- Phage-

    Oysters negatives for both norovirus genome and infectious bacteriophages

    Other: Oyster consumption

Interventions

  • OtherOyster consumption

    Volunteers consume one of the four panel of oysters (Noro+Phage+, Noro+Phage-, Noro-Phage+ and Noro-Phage-).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Norovirus concentration in feces (genome copy number/grammes of feces)

    A norovirus genome augmentation may indicate virus replication

    Time frame: Baseline (J0) and during symptoms if any or within 36-60 hours after consumption in another case

  2. Gastroenteritis symptoms

    Time frame: within 3 days after consumption

  3. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) detection in feces

    In case of asymptomatic infection, IgA are secreted

    Time frame: within 3-5 days after consumption

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHRU Nancy
    Nancy, Lorraine 54000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2020; primary completion for Feb 2020, 1 month later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 23, 2019
First posted
Aug 23, 2024
StartEst.
Jan 2020
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2020
CompletionEst.
Feb 2020
Last update
Aug 23, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06568380
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 23, 2024
Start date
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 23, 2024

Study contacts

Christophe Gantzer, Pr
study director · LCPME -UMR Université de Lorraine/CNRS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion