ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06557551proTeCtUpdated Oct 15, 2024

Prophylactic Surfactant by Thin Endotracheal Catheter for Preterm Infants At Birth: the ProTeCt Trial

An interventional study of Thin catheter surfactant in Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Prematurity and Prematurity; Extreme, sponsored by University College Dublin. Recruiting at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged Up to 30 Minutes. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by University College Dublin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
164
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 30 Minutes
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether giving surfactant through a thin endotracheal catheter to extremely premature babies shortly after birth reduces the number of them who are ventilated in the first 3 days of life.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Do fewer babies who receive prophylactic thin catheter surfactant under video laryngoscopy shortly after birth go on to be ventilated within 72 hours of birth?

Extremely premature babies who are receiving breathing support through a face mask will either:

  • Receive surfactant through a thin catheter that is inserted into their windpipe (trachea) under video laryngoscopy at or after 5 minutes of life, have the catheter removed immediately, and return to face mask breathing support; or
  • Continue on face mask breathing support.

All babies will be closely watched to see whether they are ventilated for breathing support in the first 72 hours of life.

Read the detailed description

Preterm infants - particularly those born before 28 weeks of gestation - are at risk of developing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), a condition characterised by structural and functional lung immaturity that leads to progressive respiratory failure. Infants at high risk of or who show early signs of RDS are treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in an attempt to prevent respiratory failure. Infants whose RDS worsens despite CPAP are given surfactant. To give surfactant, clinicians use a laryngoscope to view the airway and insert a relatively wide-bore endotracheal tube (ETT) directly into the trachea. When an ETT is used to deliver surfactant, the ETT usually remains in place for a period of mechanical ventilation (MV). Clinicians aim to minimise the duration of ventilation, as even short periods of MV may be harmful to the preterm lung. An alternative approach, sometimes called "less-invasive surfactant application" (LISA), is to give surfactant through a thin endotracheal catheter. These thin catheters (TC) cannot be used for mechanical ventilation and so they are immediately removed after the surfactant has been given.

A Cochrane systematic review found that, compared to giving surfactant through an ETT in the NICU, TC surfactant is associated with reduced risk of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), less intubation in the first 72 hours and reduced incidence of major complications and in-hospital mortality. However, the studies included in the systematic review are heterogenous, few of them enrolled infants born before 28 weeks of gestation and none of them evaluated the effects of giving TC surfactant shortly after birth, before starting CPAP in the NICU. In all of these studies, the clinician inserting the TC viewed the airway directly through the mouth (i.e. performed direct laryngoscopy).

Inserting an ETT in a newborn infant using direct laryngoscopy is challenging. Clinicians use clinical signs detected during positive pressure ventilation (PPV) (e.g. detection of exhaled carbon dioxide, auscultation of breath sounds, condensation in the tube in expiration) to determine whether the ETT has been placed correctly. We recently demonstrated that more first intubation attempts with an ETT in newborn infants are successful when clinicians used a video laryngoscope (VL) to view the airway indirectly compared to direct laryngoscopy. . As PPV cannot be given through a TC, the only way of determining the position of a TC is to see it enter the larynx. Using VL during TC insert attempts allows multiple observers to simultaneously and independently determine whether it is in the correct place.

The earlier that surfactant is given, the more effective it appears to be. It is possible that TC surfactant given "prophylactically" - i.e. very shortly after birth, when there are minimal signs of respiratory distress - under VL guidance may substantially reduce the rate of intubation for respiratory failure. If it does, that holds out the prospect that it may reduce rates of the adverse outcomes associated with ventilation (death or BPD etc.) in preterm infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases
  • Prematurity
  • Prematurity; Extreme
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
03

In context

Infant, Newborn, Diseases

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 164 is above the median of 80 across 83 interventional studies indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases.

Browse Infant, Newborn, Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University College Dublin is the lead sponsor of 113 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 30 Minutes
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants of any sex born before 28 weeks of gestation
  • Clinicians plan to provide intensive care
  • Consent for their participation provided by parent(s)/guardian(s) before their birth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Major congenital anomalies (e.g. upper airway anomaly, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, exomphalos major, intestinal atresias, open neural tube defect, aneuploidy, cardiac lesions other than ASD/PFO/VSD/PDA )
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
164 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Thin catheter surfactant

    At or after 5 minutes of life, participants will have a thin endotracheal catheter (Surfcath, Vygon, Ecouen, France) inserted under video laryngoscopy (C-MAC, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), through which they will receive surfactant (Curosurf, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy - 120mg for infants \< 26 weeks, 240mg for infants 26 - 27+6 weeks). The catheter will then be removed, and they will continue on face mask breathing support.

    Other: Thin catheter surfactant

  • No intervention
    Standard care

    Participants will continue on face mask breathing support.

Interventions

  • OtherThin catheter surfactant

    Surfactant given through thin catheter inserted under video laryngoscopy at or after 5 minutes of life

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants intubated in the first 72 hours of life

    Endotracheal intubation 1. in the Delivery Room for apnoea or bradycardia despite mask PPV; or 2. in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, for 2 or more of * worsening clinical signs respiratory distress * oxygen requirement \> 30% for \>30 mins to keep oxygen saturation (SpO2) \>90% * pH \< 7.2 on 2 blood gases 30 minutes apart * PCO2 \>9kPa on 2 blood gases 30 minutes apart * recurrent mask PPV for apnoea Participants reach the primary outcome if they are intubated with an endotracheal tube (ETT) for mechanical ventilation, with an ETT for surfactant and mechanical ventilation, with an ETT for surfactant alone, or with a thin catheter for surfactant alone

    Time frame: First 72 hours of life

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants in whom the thin catheter is seen on video laryngoscopy to be successfully inserted at first attempt (intervention group only)

    Success at first thin catheter insertion attempt (intervention group only)

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  2. Number of participants with bradycardia [heart rate (HR) < 100bpm] in the Delivery Room (DR)

    Bradycardia (HR \< 100bpm) in the DR

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  3. Number of participants who receive mask Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV) in the DR

    Mask PPV in the DR

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  4. Number of participants who undergo endotracheal intubation in the DR

    Endotracheal intubation in the DR

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  5. Number of participants who receive chest compressions in the DR

    Chest compressions in the DR

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  6. Number of participants who receive adrenaline in the DR

    Adrenaline administration in the DR

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  7. Number of participants who receive volume expansion in the DR

    Volume expansion in the DR

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  8. Number of participants who are itubated at any time during hospitalisation

    Intubation at any time during hospitalisation

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  9. Number if participants who receive intratracheal surfactant post intervention

    Treatment with intratracheal surfactant, post prophylactic delivery room TC surfactant in the intervention group, or at any time in the control group

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  10. Number of participants who have pneumothorax drained with needle aspiration or chest drain insertion

    Pneumothorax drained with needle aspiration or chest drain insertion

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  11. Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)

    Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  12. Duration of any respiratory support (ventilation, CPAP, HFNC) (days)

    Duration of any respiratory support (ventilation, CPAP, HFNC) (days)

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  13. Duration of oxygen therapy (days)

    Duration of oxygen therapy (days)

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  14. Number of participants who have bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) among survivors to 36 weeks

    Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) among survivors to 36 weeks

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  15. Number of participants who receive postnatal steroids for BPD

    Treatment with systemic postnatal corticosteroids (e.g. dexamethasone) for respiratory insufficiency

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  16. Number of participants with severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) (grade III or IV) on cranial ultrasound

    Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) (grade III or IV) on cranial ultrasound

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  17. Number of participants with cystic periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) on cranial ultrasound

    Cystic periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) on cranial ultrasound

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  18. Number of participants with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treated medically

    Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treated medically

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  19. Number of participants with PDA treated with transcatheter closure or surgical ligation

    PDA treated with transcatheter closure or surgical ligation

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  20. Number of participants with necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) Bell stage 2 or greater

    Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) Bell stage 2 or greater

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  21. Number of participants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP)

    Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP)

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  22. Number of participants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) stage 3 or greater

    Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) stage 3 or greater

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  23. Number of participants who die before or have BPD at 36 weeks

    Death or BPD at 36 weeks

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  24. Duration of hospitalisation (days)

    Duration of hospitalisation (days)

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  25. Number of participants who are discharged home in oxygen

    Discharged home receiving supplemental oxygen

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

  26. Number of participants who die during first hospitalisation

    Death during first hospitalisation

    Time frame: 4 months or before hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Maternity Hospital
    Dublin, None Selected D02 YH21, Ireland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Abdel-Latif ME, Davis PG, Wheeler KI, De Paoli AG, Dargaville PA. Surfactant therapy via thin catheter in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 10;5(5):CD011672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011672.pub2. PubMed 33970483 ↗
  • Geraghty LE, Dunne EA, Ni Chathasaigh CM, Vellinga A, Adams NC, O'Currain EM, McCarthy LK, O'Donnell CPF. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Urgent Intubation of Newborn Infants. N Engl J Med. 2024 May 30;390(20):1885-1894. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402785. Epub 2024 May 5. PubMed 38709215 ↗
  • Bahadue FL, Soll R. Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD001456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001456.pub2. PubMed 23152207 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Participant data may be made available to other researchers on receipt of acceptable written request by principal Investigator

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Available 1 year after publication for 2 years

Access criteria: Participant data may be made available to other researchers on receipt of acceptable written request by principal Investigator

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 27 months after the start.

Of 42 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Infant, Newborn, Diseases, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 27 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 8, 2024
First posted
Aug 16, 2024
StartActual
Aug 19, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
Last update
Oct 15, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06557551
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 16, 2024
Start date
Aug 19, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Study contacts

Colm PF O'Donnell, MB PhD
Contact
codonnell@nmh.ie
35316373100
Colm PF O'Donnell
principal investigator · National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion