ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06539507Updated Nov 6, 2026

A Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of BCX17725

A Phase 1 interventional study of BCX17725 and Placebo in Netherton Syndrome, sponsored by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals. Active, not recruiting at 12 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 6, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a first-in-human, Phase 1/1b, 4-part study that includes the evaluation of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of BCX17725 when administered via single and multiple doses in healthy adult participants (Parts 1 and 2), and multiple doses in adult participants with Netherton syndrome (Part 3). In Part 4, the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of BCX17725 when administered via multiple IV and/or SC doses through 12 weeks will be evaluated in adult and adolescent participants with Netherton syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Parts 1 and 2 are randomized, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) study parts, respectively, in healthy participants. Part 3 will evaluate multiple dose administrations in participants with Netherton syndrome in an open-label design. Part 4 will evaluate multiple administrations of BCX17725 in participants with Netherton syndrome in an open-label study design over 12 weeks, with an 8-week post-treatment follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Netherton Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • First-in-human
  • Single ascending dose
  • Multiple ascending dose
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Placebo control
  • Netherton syndrome
03

In context

Netherton Syndrome

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Netherton Syndrome; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is above the median of 16 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Netherton Syndrome.

Browse Netherton Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female aged 18 to 55 years, inclusive (Parts 1 and 2), 18 to 65 years, inclusive (Part 3), or 12 to 65 years, inclusive (Part 4)
  • Confirmed diagnosis of Netherton syndrome (Parts 3 and 4)
  • IGA score of ≥ 3 (Parts 3 and 4) and IASI score of ≥ 16 (Part 4)
  • between 18 and 30 kg/m\^2, inclusive (Parts 1 and 2)
  • Estimated (eGFR) of ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 (Parts 1 and 2) or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 (Part 3)
  • Agree to follow the protocol requirements from screening until 90 days after the last dose of study drug
  • In the opinion of the investigator, expected to adequately comply with all required study procedures and restrictions for the duration of the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part 1 - BCX17725 single dose

    Participants randomized to BCX17725 will receive BCX17725 as a single dose in sequential ascending dose cohorts

    Drug: BCX17725

  • Experimental
    Part 1 - placebo single dose

    Participants randomized to placebo will receive placebo as a single dose

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Part 2 - BCX17725 multiple doses

    Participants randomized to BCX17725 will receive BCX17725 as multiple doses in sequential ascending dose cohorts

    Drug: BCX17725

  • Experimental
    Part 2 - placebo multiple doses

    Participants randomized to placebo will receive placebo as multiple doses

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Part 3 - BCX17725 multiple doses

    Participants will receive BCX17725 as multiple doses

    Drug: BCX17725

  • Experimental
    Part 4 - BCX17725 multiple doses

    Participants will receive BCX17725 as multiple doses

    Drug: BCX17725

Interventions

  • DrugBCX17725

    BCX17725 for injection

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo for injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

    Incidence of TEAEs as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) from screening through end-of-study (EOS) in each study part

    Time frame: From screening through EOS (ie, through Day 78 in Parts 1 and 3, and Day 106 in Part 2)

  2. Change from baseline in Ichthyosis Area and Severity Index (IASI) score at Week 12 (Part 4)

    IASI measures the severity of erythema (IASI-E) and scaling (IASI-S); the maximum sub-scores for the IASI-E and IASI-S being 24, and the maximum total IASI score being 48. Higher scores indicate worse clinical outcome.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax)

    Cmax of BCX17725

    Time frame: Up to Day 64 (Part 1), Day 92 (Part 2), and Day 78 (Part 3)

  2. Time to maximum observed serum concentration (Tmax)

    Time to Cmax of BCX17725

    Time frame: Up to Day 64 (Part 1), Day 92 (Part 2), and Day 78 (Part 3)

  3. Area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t)

    AUC0-t of BCX17725

    Time frame: Up to Day 64 (Part 1), Day 92 (Part 2), and Day 78 (Part 3)

  4. Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2)

    Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of BCX17725

    Time frame: Up to Day 64 (Part 1), Day 92 (Part 2), and Day 78 (Part 3)

  5. Number of participants who are anti-drug antibody (ADA)-positive (baseline and post-baseline) and number of participants who have treatment-emergent ADAs

    Incidence of ADAs to BCX17725

    Time frame: Day 1 pre-dose and up to Day 64 (Part 1), Day 92 (Part 2), and Day 78 (Part 3)

  6. Change from baseline in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score at Week 12 (Part 4)

    IGA assesses the overall severity of a participant's NS skin disease based on a 5-point scale (0, clear; 1, almost clear; 2, mild; 3, moderate; and 4, severe). Higher scores indicate worse clinical outcome.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

  7. Change from baseline in Worst Itch Numerical Rating Score (NRS) at Week 12 (Part 4)

    Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a self-rated, single-item scale designed for assessing the worst itch in the past 7 days. The scale uses an 11-point NRS, scored from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst possible itch). Higher scores indicate worse clinical outcome.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

  8. Incidence of TEAEs (Part 4)

    Incidence of TEAEs as assessed by CTCAE

    Time frame: From baseline through Week 20

  9. Serum concentrations of BCX17725 (Part 4)

    Serum concentrations of BCX17725

    Time frame: From baseline through Week 20

07

Study locations

12 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Nov 6, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2026→Dec 2026
Nov 6, 2026
Study completion
Dec 2026→Feb 2027
Nov 6, 2026
Enrollment
78 (estimated)→76 (actual)
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    Primary completion Oct 2026→Dec 2026
    Study completion Dec 2026→Feb 2027
    Enrollment 78 (estimated)→76 (actual)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06539507
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2024
Start date
Sep 26, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion