ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06538974ALERTUpdated Aug 6, 2024

Adherence to Long-term Exoskeleton Rehabilitation to Treat Lower Limb Weakness and / or Deficiencies in Adult Population

An interventional study of Hands-free exoskeleton in Motor Disorders, Gait Disorders, Neurologic and Neurodegenerative Diseases, sponsored by Wandercraft. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-06.

Sponsored by Wandercraft · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2023, registered Jul 2024).
  • Started Feb 2023; still recruiting 3 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In 2019, approximately 2.4 billion people worldwide required rehabilitation for various health pathologies, a 63% increase since 1990. It has been suggested that current rehabilitation frameworks (inpatient, outpatient, and community-based) are insufficient to meet local population needs due to issues like long waiting times, lack of facilities, prioritization, funding, and accessibility.Patients with lower limb weaknesses, resulting from various conditions (for example stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury and others) require long-term management and motivation for engagement, which are crucial for functional outcomes. This highlights the need for sustainable gait and balance rehabilitation.

New technologies like exoskeletons have shown promising results in short-term inpatient programs, improving gait, balance, and quality of life, however, long-term follow-up data are still needed.

The present clinical investigation is a national, prospective, open-label interventional trial, proposing a 12-month outpatient rehabilitation program with the Atalante X exoskeleton to treat lower limb weakness and/or impairments in 100 participants. The rehabilitation program consists of at least one exoskeleton rehabilitation session per week. At the end of the first-year experimental phase, participants can continue for an additional year in the voluntary phase. The program aims to explore the potential long-term effects of supervised robotic rehabilitation on motor, cognitive, bowel, bladder functions, quality of life, and well-being. Assessments are conducted at baseline, after 4 and 12 months of exoskeleton rehabilitation, and at 16 and 24 months for participants in the voluntary phase.

02

Conditions studied

  • Motor Disorders
  • Gait Disorders, Neurologic
  • Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Weakness, Muscle
  • Cerebrovascular Accident

Keywords

  • Hands-free Exoskeleton
  • Atalante X
  • Gait
  • Balance
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Motor Disorders

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Disorders; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 41 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Motor Disorders.

Browse Motor Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Wandercraft is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient suffering from lower limb weaknesses and / or deficiencies regardless of the cause
  • Adult patient ≥18 years old
  • Patient able to read and write in French and who have signed an form
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individual with severe spasticity of adductor muscles, hamstring, quadriceps and triceps surae. Severe spasticity is defined by a score of 4 on the modified Ashworth scale
  • Pregnant woman
  • Individual with history of osteoporotic fracture and / or pathology or treatment causing secondary osteoporosis
  • Pressure Ulcer of Grade I or higher according to the NPUAP International Pressure Ulcer Classification System- EPUAP, in areas of contact with the Atalante X system
  • Severe aphasia limiting ability to express needs or to fulfil questionnaires, at the discretion of the physician.
  • Patient with a cardiac or respiratory to physical exertion, at discretion of the physician
  • Patient unable to deliver his/her consent
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Patient participating at the same time in another study
  • Patients with morphological contraindications to the use of the Atalante X exoskeleton (as per user's manual) with exceptions as follows: knee flessum of 20° authorized if sensibility is present; equinus of the ankle of 20° allowed regardless of presence or absence of sensibility, hip flessum of 20° allowed regardless of presence or absence of sensibility.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hands-free exoskeleton

    Device: Hands-free exoskeleton

Interventions

  • DeviceHands-free exoskeleton

    During the one-year intervention period, participants will complete at least one exoskeleton session per week (≥36 sessions) with the Atalante X. The additional voluntary year follows the same design. During sessions with the exoskeleton, the patients will perform ambulatory exercises with the device, with a gradual increase of intensity through the sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Function in Sitting Test

    The Function in Sitting Test consists of 14 items, each scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates the lowest ability and 4 represents normal sitting abilities. The maximum achievable score is 56, reflecting normal ability.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. 10-meter walk test

    Gait speed during 10 meter walk

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  2. Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration in Balance

    Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration in Balance test evaluates how different sensory inputs contribute to balance control by assessing balance tasks performed under different sensory conditions: eyes open, firm surface; eyes closed, firm surface; eyes open, foam surface; and eyes closed, foam surface. Scores are based on the time the participant can maintain balance (0-30 seconds for each task, with the maximum score being 120 seconds for all tasks, higher scores reflecting good sensory integration and balance control).

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  3. Timed Up and Go

    Timed Up and Go is a timed task where patient is asked to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk and sit again. Based on established thresholds in the literature for various pathologies, the test helps determine if the participant is at risk of falling.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  4. Functional Independence Measure

    Functional Independence Measure scale score measures the level of disability and the amount of assistance required for an individual to perform activities of daily living. The total score ranges from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater independence.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  5. 6-minute walk test

    6-minute walk test measures the walked distance during a 6 minutes' walk, thus assessing walking endurance and aerobic capacities. Results are compared to normative values based on population-specific references available in the literature.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  6. A five-step clinical assessment of spasticity

    A five-step clinical assessment of spasticity is used to assess adductor muscles, gluteus maximus, hamstrings, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius and soleus.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  7. Biering-Sorensen test

    Biering-Sorensen test measures isometric endurance of the trunk extensor muscles, higher times reflecting better endurance.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  8. Muscle strength

    Hip flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, knee flexion and extension, plantar flexion and extension muscle strength is assessed by using a dynamometer measure (expressed in Newton).

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months, at 16 and 24 months

  9. Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a cognition assessment with scores ranging from 0 to 30, the latter signifying a normal cognitive function.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  10. Adverse events monitoring

    Safety is monitored through adverse events occurrence.

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months for each participant

  11. Modified Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion

    Modified Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion measures a level of perceived effort and exertion, breathlessness and fatigue during physical activity with rating going from 0 - nothing at all to 10 - meaning almost maximal effort.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months, at 16 and 24 months

  12. System Usability Scale

    System Usability Scale measures usability of the exoskeleton training. The scores are from 0 to 100, scores above 72.5 reflecting good usability.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  13. General satisfaction questionnaire

    General satisfaction is assessed by 3-item questionnaire, assessing interest, satisfaction and level of discomfort. The score is comprised from 0 to 10, higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction following the assessed exoskeleton session.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  14. Specific acceptability

    Specific acceptability is assessed by five-item questionnaire evaluating participants feedback on post-session anxiety, motivation, safety, fatigue and pain.The score is comprised from 0 to 10, higher scores reflecting higher perceived specific acceptability following the assessed exoskeleton session.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  15. Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36

    Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) assesses health related quality of life, by evaluating 8 subdimensions which concern physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional, and mental health. Two summary scores can be retrieved from the questionnaire: physical health and mental health. For people unable to walk, thus using wheelchair, additional three questions will be added from SF-36 walk-wheel questionnaire. Each domain is scored separately, and scores range from 0 to 100. The higher scores indicate better health status.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  16. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score

    Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score measures bowel function, having the scores ranging from 0 to 47, scores above 14 signifying severe bowel dysfunction.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  17. Qualiveen questionnaire

    Qualiveen questionnaire assesses neurogenic bladder function related quality of life, each item being scored on a Likert type scale ranging from 0 to 4, assessing 4 areas: discomfort, constraints, fears, and the patient's experience. The score ranges from 0 to 4, higher scores indicating lower bladder function related quality of life.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  18. DN4

    DN4 questionnaire is used to identify neuropathic pain in patients. The score ranges from 0 to 10, a score of 4 or more is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  19. Sensation assessment

    3-item sensation assessment with binary choice responses (yes or no) assessed by a physician regarding participants' capacity to perceive superficial sensation (touch awareness, pain perception) and proprioceptive sensation (kinesthetic awareness).

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  20. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is a 14-question instrument rated on a 4-point severity scale ranging between no impairment (0) and severe impairment (3). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale consists of two scales, one for anxiety, and one for depression, with a maximum score of 21 for each, respectively. Total scores from 8 to 10 for anxiety and depression are considered to be borderline abnormal and scores higher than 11 pathological.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  21. Goal Attainment Scaling

    Goal Attainment scaling tasks are individually identified to suit the subject, and the levels are individually set around their current and expected levels of performance. The progression is measured by identified levels that are as follows: Baseline score (-2), improved less than expected (-1), improved as expected (0), improved more than expected (+1) and improved much more than expected (+2).

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  22. The Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale

    The Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale measures clinically-based adherence to rehabilitation. The overall score is 15, higher numbers, representing better adherence to rehabilitation.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months

  23. Number of performed exoskeleton sessions

    The number of exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions performed will be tracked for each participant.

    Time frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant

  24. Duration of exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions

    The duration of exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant, and will be expressed in minutes.

    Time frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant

  25. The duration of verticalization during exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions

    The time spent in an upright position (verticalization) during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant, and expressed in minutes.

    Time frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant

  26. Number of steps performed during exoskeleton sessions

    The overall number of steps performed during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant.

    Time frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant

  27. Level of device assistance during exoskeleton sessions

    The level of device assistance during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant, and expressed as a percentage.

    Time frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant

  28. Number of passive steps performed during exoskeleton sessions

    The number of passive steps performed during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant.

    Time frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant

  29. Number of active steps performed during exoskeleton sessions

    The number of active steps performed during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant.

    Time frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. Epub 2020 Dec 1. Erratum In: Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):198. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32592-7. PubMed 33275908 ↗
  • Eldar R, Kullmann L, Marincek C, Sekelj-Kauzlaric K, Svestkova O, Palat M. Rehabilitation medicine in countries of Central/Eastern Europe. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):134-41. doi: 10.1080/09638280701191776. PubMed 17852214 ↗
  • Kamenov K, Mills JA, Chatterji S, Cieza A. Needs and unmet needs for rehabilitation services: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 May;41(10):1227-1237. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1422036. Epub 2018 Jan 5. PubMed 29303004 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 52 months after the start.

Of 34 interventional studies with no phase under Motor Disorders, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 52 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2024
First posted
Aug 6, 2024
StartActual
Feb 16, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2, 2027
Last update
Aug 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06538974
Lead sponsor
Wandercraft
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2024
Start date
Feb 16, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 6, 2024

Study contacts

Rebecca Sauvagnac, MD
Contact
rebecca.sauvagnac@wandercraft.health
+33 (0)1 79 35 31 09
Dijana Nuic, Ph.D
Contact
dijana.nuic@wandercraft.health
+33 (0)1 79 35 31 09
Rebecca Sauvagnac, MD
principal investigator · Wandercraft

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion