CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06517030Updated Apr 16, 2025

Socket Reconstruction Technique and Immediate Implant Placement With Two Different Bone Substitute Materials.

An interventional study of Tooth Extraction and Immediate Implant Placement in Dental Implant, sponsored by Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-16.

Sponsored by Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present research is a national multicentric prospective parallel double-blinded (both the patient and the examiner are blind) randomized controlled clinical trial. It is a superiority comparative study on a medical device CE (conformité européenne) marking, used according to the intended use subject to the CE marking.

The hypothesis tested is: the socket reconstruction procedure performed in conjunction with Immediate implant placement (IIP) with the use of Deproteinized bovine bone mineral + hyaluronic acid (DBBM+HA, Cerabone plus) leads to a greater increase in the vertical buccal bone height than same procedure with deproteinized bovine bone mineral alone (DBBM, Bio-oss Collagen).

Read the detailed description

The present research is a national multicentric prospective parallel double-blinded (both the patient and the investigator who will perform the measurements are blind) randomized controlled clinical trial. It is a superiority comparative study on a medical device CE marking, used according to the intended use subject to the CE marking.

The hypothesis tested is: the socket reconstruction procedure performed in conjunction with IIP with the use of DBBM+HA leads to a greater increase in the vertical buccal bone height than same procedure with DBBM alone.

The present study will be reported according to the CONSORT statement for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials (http://www.consort-statement.org/).

Patients will be randomly treated by means of IIP+connective tissue graft (CTG)+DBBM+HA (Test group or A group) or IIP+CTG+DBBM (Control group or B group). A randomization list will be generated in blocks: patients will be divided in 3 blocks according to the study center (M=San Raffaele Hospital, Milan; B=University of Bologna; S=University of Siena) and the treatment will be assigned at random in each block to ensure a balanced distribution of the tested interventions, with a ratio test:control=1:1. The investigator who will generate the allocation sequence will not be the person who will determine eligibility and entry of patients. The assignments (A or B group) will enclose in serially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, each bearing on the outside only the letter corresponding to the name of the center (M, B, S) and a number (from 1 to 10). A designated investigator for each center will be responsible to ensure that the envelopes will be opened sequentially, and only after the patient will undergo extraction of the hopeless tooth, implant placement, and clinical measurement assessment. For each patient, a sequential number will be assigned based on the date of enrollment, and the envelope with the corresponding number will be opened for each of them.

Both the investigator who will perform the measurements and the patients will be blinded to the randomization. The principal investigator (PI) will make sure patients are blind by simply not telling them there is a difference between the two medical devices; while he will ensure that investigator (who will perform the measurements) is blind by assigning a code or an identifying number to the two treatment groups so that they cannot know which device has been used.

Patients will be followed for 6 months after surgery.

The undermentioned 5 follow-up visits, which are standard of practice for all implant-bearing patients, will be scheduled for each patient for both treatment groups at:

  1. 7±2 days post-surgery - clinical and photographic examination, collection of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale).
  2. 14±4 days post-surgery - suture removal, clinical and photographic examination.
  3. 1 month±7 days post-surgery - clinical and photographic examination.
  4. 3 months±5 days post-surgery - clinical and photographic examination, measurements of the following parameters: Gingival recession depth (REC in mm), Keratinized tissue width (KTW in mm), Soft tissue thickness (GT in mm), Pocket probing depth (PPD in mm), Bleeding on probing (BoP), Plaque index (PI).
  5. 6 months ±1 month post-surgery - clinical and photographic examination, CBCT scan, periapical radiography, 3D digital dental impression, measurements of the following parameters: Gingival recession depth (REC in mm), Keratinized tissue width (KTW in mm), Pocket probing depth (PPD in mm), Bleeding on probing (BoP), Plaque index (PI).

After the visit at 6 months, each patient will then be considered "off study" (e.g. subject has completed treatment and all follow-up visits).

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Implant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
  2. In good general health as evidenced by medical history.
  3. Presenting a single hopeless tooth candidate for extraction in the maxillary or mandibular area (from second premolar to second premolar, intercalated or the last tooth of dental arch) in need of a single implant-supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitation.
  4. Presence of >3mm of buccal wall dehiscence evaluated using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
  5. In healthy periodontal conditions (i.e., no presence of sites ≥ 4 mm and/or presence of intra-bony defects in the selected sites, full mouth plaque score \< 20% and full-mouth bleeding score \< 20%).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current or previous use of immunosuppressant, bisphosphonate, or high-dose corticosteroid therapy.
  2. Presence of inflammatory and autoimmune disease of the oral cavity.
  3. Severe or poorly controlled diabetes or previous radiotherapy of head area.
  4. Contraindications to dental and/or surgical interventions (e.g. severe endocrine bone diseases, severe metabolic bone disorders, malignant tumour diseases).
  5. Individuals who are smokers of >10 cigarettes/day.
  6. Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
  7. Presence of \<3mm of dehiscence of buccal walls of the socket after tooth extraction.
  8. Presence of a distance between the interdental bone crest and buccal bone crest \<3 mm after tooth extraction.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test group (DBBM+HA)

    In Test group, the gap between the implant surface and the bone plates will be filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral with hyaluronic acid (Botiss Cerabone Plus; Botiss biomaterials, Hauptstr. 28 15806 Zossen, Germany). The material will be pre-wetted in saline, inserted in the gap and once soaked in blood, it will be gently pressed to the bone walls to completely fill the space and around buccal aspects of the exposed implant surface, up to the top of the abutment.

    Procedure: Tooth Extraction · Procedure: Immediate Implant Placement · Procedure: Socket reconstruction with DBBB+HA · Procedure: CTG placement

  • Active comparator
    Control group (DBBM)

    In Control group, deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (Bio-Oss Collagen; Geistlich Pharma, Wolhusen, Switzerland) will be positioned in the gap. The material will be pre-wetted in saline, inserted in the gap and once soaked in blood, it will be gently pressed to the bone walls to completely fill the space and around buccal aspects of the exposed implant surface, up to the top of the abutment.

    Procedure: Tooth Extraction · Procedure: Immediate Implant Placement · Procedure: Socket reconstruction with DBBB · Procedure: CTG placement

Interventions

  • ProcedureTooth Extraction

    After local anaesthesia, a buccal split-full-split-thickness envelope flap will be elevated, and the tooth will be extracted a-traumatically.

  • ProcedureImmediate Implant Placement

    After providing that the extraction socket will meet the inclusion criteria, an implant will be immediately inserted with 1 mm of its transmucosal portion positioned under the interproximal bone crest.

  • ProcedureSocket reconstruction with DBBB+HA

    The gap between the implant surface and the bone plates will be filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral with hyaluronic acid (DBBM+HA).

  • ProcedureSocket reconstruction with DBBB

    The gap between the implant surface and the bone plates will be filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).

  • ProcedureCTG placement

    Once the appropriate healing abutments will be installed, a CTG will be utilized as a barrier membrane. Then, the buccal flap will be coronally advanced and will be adapted to the healing abutment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vertical buccal bone height changes (∆VBBH).

    the vertical linear distance from point A (the most coronal point of the buccal crest of the baseline socket) to point B (the most coronal point of the buccal crest at 6 months after implant insertion)

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months after procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Width of keratinized tissue (KTW).

    Measured at the buccal aspect, as the distance between gingival margin and mucogingival junction.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months after treatment.

  2. Soft tissue contour changes.

    Linear and volumetric measurements will be performed using Stl files superimposition.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months after treatment.

  3. Soft tissue thickness (STT).

    Superimposition of DICOM file, representing hard tissue volume, to STL file representing soft tissue contour, will be used to measure the buccal soft tissue thickness in the two different treatment groups.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months after treatment.

  4. Horizontal Buccal Bone Changes.

    The horizontal linear distance between the outer surface of buccal bone at baseline and that at 6 months will be evaluated.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months after treatment.

  5. Osseous Ridge Width Changes.

    the horizontal linear distance from the outer surface of buccal bone to the outer surface of palatal/lingual bone, measured at baseline and at 6 months. The osseous ridge width changes in millimetres (mm) and in percentage (%ORR) will be also calculated.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 months after treatment.

  6. Wound healing index (WHI).

    The following criteria will be used: * score 1 = uneventful healing with no gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence + intact papillae height * score 2 = uneventful healing with slight gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, or flap dehiscence, but no suppuration + reduced papillae height * score 3 = poor wound healing with significant gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, flap dehiscence, or any suppuration + loss of papillae height

    Time frame: at 7 and 14 days after treatment.

  7. Post-surgical pain (PP)

    Subjects will be also asked to evaluate pain perception at day 7 and day 14 using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score (0 = no pain 10 = maximal pain).

    Time frame: at 7 and 14 days after treatment.

  8. Amount of drug intake

    The daily consumption of analgesics/anti-inflammatory medications from the day of surgery until day 14 will be calculated.

    Time frame: from the day of surgery until day 14

  9. Handling of materials.

    The clinical handling of the two grafts will be assessed retrospectively by the surgeons using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 = easy to be applied, 10 = very difficult to be applied)

    Time frame: at the day of the surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ospedale San Raffaele
    Milan, Mi, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06517030
Lead sponsor
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele
Responsible party
Massimo de Sanctis (Professor, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2024
Start date
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2025

Study contacts

Giovanna Laura Di Domenico
Contact
giovannalauradd@gmail.com
+393485826742

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion