An observational study in Patient Preference, sponsored by Fujita Health University. Recruiting at 1 site in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-03.
Sponsored by Fujita Health University · Observational
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) is reported to improve the outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, cardiac-events still occur in FFR-deferral patients in long-term follow-up. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-defined high-risk-plaque (HRP) is known to relate future cardiac events. The investigators hypothesized that CTA might identify plaque features linked to future cardiac events in deferral patients.
Although fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous-coronary-intervention (PCI) has improved short- and middle-term outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI alone, cardiac-events still occur in FFR-deferral patients in long-term.1-4 Recent J-CONFIRM registry examined 1263 patients with 1447 lesions in whom revascularization was deferred based on FFR in the 28 centers.5 While 2-year target vessel failure (TVF) rate was 5.5% in deferred lesions in the J-CONFIRM registry, 5-year TVF raised up 11.6% in deferred lesions.5, 6 The TVF rate raised up from 5.5% to 11.6% in the last 3 years mainly due to clinically driven target-vessel-revascularization (TVR) in the registry.5, 6 In the DEFER trial, patients with FFR > 0.75 were randomly assigned to PCI deferral (Defer) or performance (Perform) and patients showing FFR \< 0.75 underwent PCI (Reference).3 The 5-year cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rate were excellent in the Defer group as compared to Perform and Reference groups (3.3%, 7.9%, and 15.7%, p \< 0.003, respectively).4 However, 15-year follow-up of the DEFER study revealed that all cause of mortality and TVR were similar among Defer, Perform and Reference groups (mortality; 33.0% vs. 31.1% vs. 36.1% p= 0.441 respectively, and TVR; 36.3% vs. 27.8% vs. 35.4%, p= 0.522 respectively).7 Favorable initial 5-year clinical outcome in deferral patients has been lost during 15-year follow-up in the DEFER study. It is urgent issue to disclose the factor to predict future cardiac events in deferral lesions. The failure of PCI to modify long-term outcomes may stem from its inability to modify the underlying atherosclerotic process.
Furthermore, recent PREVENT study disclosed that in patients with non-flow-limiting (FFR >0.80) vulnerable coronary plaques identified by intracoronary imaging, preventive PCI reduced major adverse cardiac events (MACE) arising from high-risk vulnerable plaques, compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone8. Although their high-risk vulnerable plaques were defined using intracoronary imaging but not coronary CT angiography (CTA) in the PREVENT study, the presence of high-risk vulnerable plaque without flow-limiting (FFR >0.80) frequently caused the subsequent cardiac events in patients without the initial PCI.
While CTA is known to be useful to evaluate coronary artery plaque features as well as stenosis severity, high-risk plaque (HRP) on coronary CTA defined as a combination of positive remodeling (PR) and low attenuation plaque (LAP) has been reported to be associated with the future cardiac events.9-12 Gallone and coworkers reported in their meta-analysis that high-risk coronary plaque characteristics significantly predicted patient-level and lesion-level major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in the future, using various high-risk coronary plaque definitions by several intracoronary imaging modalities and CTA.13 The investigators hypothesized that CTA could identify plaque features linked to future cardiac events in deferral patients. To determine the predictive factors for future cardiac events in FFR-based deferral patients, the investigators examined clinical features and plaque characteristics on CTA in the deferral lesions based on invasive FFR in consecutive 373 patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS).
112 studies on the registry are indexed under Patient Preference; 28 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 200 across 55 observational studies indexed under Patient Preference.
Browse Patient Preference studies →Fujita Health University is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
A consecutive series of 437 patients who underwent CTA within 90 days before ICA with FFR pressure measurement were candidates for this study at Fujita Health University Hospital, Bantane Hospital, and Nagoya First Red Cross Hospital
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
A consecutive series of patients who underwent Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) within 90 days before invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) pressure measurement were candidates for this study at Fujita Health University Hospital, Bantane Hospital, and Nagoya First Red Cross Hospital.
Diagnostic Test: invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) pressure measurement
A consecutive series of patients who underwent Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) within 90 days before invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) pressure measurement were candidates for this study at Fujita Health University Hospital, Bantane Hospital, and Nagoya First Red Cross Hospital
Also known as: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)
Cardiac events in patient level
a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and ischemia-driven revascularization for patient-level analysis
Time frame: From 2018 to 2026
Cardiac events in lesion level
lesion-level ACS and lesion-level ischemia-driven revascularization
Time frame: From 2018 to 2026
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Fujita Health University