ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06507488DISCOUpdated Aug 21, 2026

Daphnetin Capsule In the Treatment of VaScular COgnitive Impairment Without Dementia

An interventional study of Daphnetin Capsule and Placebo in Cerebrovascular Disorders, sponsored by First People's Hospital of Shenyang. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by First People's Hospital of Shenyang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
206
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Daphnetin Capsule in patients with vascular cognitive impairment. Changes in the Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cog(VADAS-cog) at 6 months were evaluated. Although Daphnetin has a dual neurovascular protective effect, however, there is still a lack of relevant high-quality studies on its role in patients with vascular cognitive impairment, especially in patients with vascular cognitive impairment in non-dementia (VCI-ND), whether it has a role in improving cognitive status needs to be urgently explored in high-quality clinical studies. Researchers are comparing Daphnetin to placebo (a drug-free analog) to see if Daphnetin is effective in treating vascular cognitive impairment. Participants will take either Daphnetin or placebo daily for six months, with follow-up visits every three months and completion of a case report form.

Read the detailed description

Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is caused by ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes and other cerebrovascular diseases, leading to cognitive and memory function impairment. With the aging population and high incidence of cerebrovascular diseases in China, Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) prevalence is rising, increasing the disease burden. However, due to the complexity of Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) symptoms and imaging changes, targeted therapies are currently lacking.

Daphnetin, a coumarin derivative, has shown promise in treating various diseases and has gained significant attention recently. It offers "triple protection" for blood, blood vessels, and ischemic tissues by inhibiting inflammation, anticoagulation, and thrombosis, protecting endothelial structures, and regulating vasoactive substances. Daphnetin is particularly beneficial for cardio-cerebral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and microvascular complications. It also expands peripheral blood vessels, improving circulation and alleviating vascular occlusive diseases.

Research indicates that Daphnetin's anti-inflammatory effects can inhibit neuroinflammation, promote synaptic growth, and enhance neuronal survival, protecting nerve cells and repairing damage. Despite these benefits, there is a lack of high-quality studies on Daphnetin's role in non-dementia vascular cognitive impairment (VCI-ND).

This project aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of oral Daphnetin capsules in treating Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) through a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with vascular cognitive dysfunction confirmed by cerebral small vessel disease imaging will participate. The study will follow the international FINESSE framework, comparing Daphnetin to a placebo over six months, with follow-up visits and case report forms completed every three months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebrovascular Disorders

Keywords

  • Vascular Cognitive Impairment No Dementia
  • Daphnetin
  • Effectiveness
  • safety
03

In context

Cerebrovascular Disorders

449 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebrovascular Disorders; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 206 is above the median of 100 across 274 interventional studies indexed under Cerebrovascular Disorders.

Browse Cerebrovascular Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

First People's Hospital of Shenyang is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Be 50-80 years of age (both ends included)
  2. Have a complaint of cognitive impairment involving memory and/or other cognitive domains that has persisted for at least 3 months
  3. Have a cognitive level that is neither normal nor demented according to , Fifth Edition, Criteria ( DSM-V criteria), a (MoCA scale) score \<26 and ≥18, and a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale score of ≥0.5 in at least one domain and an overall CDR score ≤1
  4. Have a cognitive level that is neither normal nor demented according to DSM-V criteria, a MoCA scale score \<26 and ≥18, and a CDR scale score of ≥0.5 in at least one domain and an overall CDR score ≤1
  5. Voluntarily participate in this study and sign an form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previously diagnosed dementia; vascular cognitive impairment not associated with a condition other than dementia that may affect cognition
  2. Acute stroke event within 6 months
  3. Previously diagnosed hereditary or inflammatory small vessel disease
  4. Presence of congenital mental retardation and severe neurological or psychiatric disorders
  5. Illiteracy or severe visual or hearing impairment, severe aphasia, and other factors that may preclude cooperation with neuropsychological evaluation
  6. Associated depression (Hamilton Depression Scale score ≥ 17), or other unrelated serious mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or delirium)
  7. Combined severe cardiac, pulmonary, and renal insufficiency (creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl or 177 μ mol/L), and severe hepatic impairment (aminotransferases more than 3 times normal)
  8. Alcoholism, drug addiction, or ongoing use of medications that affect cognitive assessment, such as tranquilizers, sleeping pills, puberty pills, and cholinergics
  9. Malignant tumors that have been clearly diagnosed, vital organ failure
  10. Those with bleeding tendency after surgery
  11. Pregnant and lactating women are prohibited
  12. Severe hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure(SBP)≥160mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure(DBP)≥110mmHg) is prohibited
  13. Previous allergy or intolerance to the ingredients of Reserpine
  14. The subject does not have a stable and reliable caregiver or the caregiver is unable to assist the subject in participating in the study
  15. Patients who have participated in other interventional clinical studies within the last 3 months or are currently participating in other interventional clinical studies.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
206 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Daphnetin

    oral Daphnetin Capsule three capsules/tid for up to six months.

    Drug: Daphnetin Capsule

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    oral Placebo (Daphnetin Capsule simulants) three capsules/tid for up to six months.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDaphnetin Capsule

    Daphnetin, chemically known as 7,8-dihydroxycoumarin, also known as ZuShiMaJiaSu, is a class of coumarin derivatives derived from different Daphnetin genus plant .

    Also known as: 7,8-dihydroxycoumarin

  • DrugPlacebo

    The placebo is a Daphnetin Capsule simulants

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (VADAS-cog)

    Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale(VADAS-cog) is a revision of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) to be a better measure in vascular conditions,The lowest score is 0, with higher scores representing higher levels of cognitive dysfunction and poorer status of the patient.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of combined endpoints: including new stroke (ischemic Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment typing [TOAST typing] or hemorrhagic)/transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, new-onset dementia, death

    For categorical indicators, the stratified Cochran- Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test will be used for analysis.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Incidence of each individual event of the combined endpoint

    For categorical indicators, the stratified Cochran- Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test will be used for analysis.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Clinician Interview-Based studies Impression of Change scale-plus version(CIBIC-Plus) of change

    Consists of three parts The clinician's impression of change is an assessment of change from baseline, not an assessment of severity. The clinician may refer to his/her own baseline information compiled in Part I when making the assessment of change. The clinician's assessment of impression of change should then be replicated in the main study case report form.The score of CIBIC-plus ranges from 1 to 7, and the score of 1-3 indicates improvement, 4 means no changed, and 5-7 indicates worse.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Change in the Brief Mental State Evaluation Scale (MMSE)

    Each correct item is scored as 1 point, and errors are scored as 0 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, and the cut-off value for normal and abnormal is related to the level of education; ≤17 points for the illiterate (no education) group, ≤20 points for the elementary school (≤6 years of education) group, and ≤24 points for the secondary school or above (\>6 years of education) group. Cognitive deficits are considered to be below the cut-off value and normal above it.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Change in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA)

    The MoCA scale is a 30-point scale, with ≥26 normal, 18-26 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 10-17 moderate, and less than 10 severe.Patients with MCI scored approximately 22 (19-25) points, and patients with AD scored between 11-21 points.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Changes in the Symbol Digit Transformation Test (SDMT)

    Completion of the SDMT scale within 90 seconds, with a total score of 0-110; the lower the score, the more severe the degree of cognitive impairment

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)

    The total score ranges from 0 to 18,The higher the score, the more demented the patient is, the worse the state is.

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Change in Neuropsychiatric Questionnaire (NPI-Q)

    Presence of symptoms (1-2): 1=present 2=absent. Frequency (1-4 points): 1=occasional, less than weekly; 2=frequent, about weekly; 3=several times a week but less than daily; 4=very frequent, once or more at a time or continuously. Severity (on a scale of 1 to 3): 1=mild, perceptible but not obvious; 2=moderate, obvious but not very prominent; 3=severe, very prominent changes. The degree of distress caused by the symptom to the caregiver (0-5 points): 0 = no distress; 1 = very mild distress, caregiver does not need to take steps to cope; 2 = mild distress, caregiver copes easily; 3 = moderate distress, caregiver struggles to cope; 4 = severe, caregiver is barely able to cope; 5 = extreme distress, caregiver is unable to cope. The higher the score the more severe

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Changes in the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL)

    1 = can do it all by myself; 2 = can still do it with some difficulty; 3 = need help 4 = cannot do it at all. When the patient never does it but is able to do it, it is rated as 1, never does it but has difficulty doing it but does not need help, 2, never does it but needs help, 3, never does it and is unable to do it, 4. The range of scores is from 20 to 80, and a score of \>23 is considered to be cognitively impaired.

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Changes in motor function (TUG, time to walk three meters)

    Change in motor score (TUG, time to walk three meters) at 6 months relative to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    The EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) health description system consists of five dimensions: mobility (MO), self-care (SC), ability to perform activities of daily living (UA), pain or discomfort (PD), and anxiety or depression (AD), each of which can be reported separately as "no problem, moderate problem, or severe problem".Self-rated health on a scale of 0 to 100, the higher the score the better your health is considered to be.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Shenyang First People's Hospital
    Shenyang, Liaoning 110041, China
    Recruiting
    • Li Li, MD PhD · Contactlily720823@163.com · +86 24 31956000
    • Xinze Guo, MD · Contact176953982@qq.com · +86 24 31956000
    • Li Li, MD PhD · Principal investigator
    • Wei Bian, MD · Principal investigator
    • Hong Wang · Sub investigator
    • Yang Zhao · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Benisty S. [Current concepts in vascular dementia]. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2013 Jun;11(2):171-80. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2013.0410. French. PubMed 23803634 ↗
  • Wu YT, Lee HY, Norton S, Chen C, Chen H, He C, Fleming J, Matthews FE, Brayne C. Prevalence studies of dementia in mainland china, Hong Kong and taiwan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e66252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066252. Print 2013. PubMed 23776645 ↗
  • D'Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Addante F, Ciccone F, Cascavilla L, Paris F, Picoco M, Nuzzaci C, Elia AC, Greco A, Chiarini R, Panza F, Pilotto A. Caregiver burden characterization in patients with Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;30(9):891-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.4232. Epub 2014 Dec 4. PubMed 25475248 ↗
  • Kalaria RN. The pathology and pathophysiology of vascular dementia. Neuropharmacology. 2018 May 15;134(Pt B):226-239. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.12.030. Epub 2017 Dec 19. PubMed 29273521 ↗
  • Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, Burke JR, Hurd MD, Potter GG, Rodgers WL, Steffens DC, Willis RJ, Wallace RB. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1-2):125-32. doi: 10.1159/000109998. Epub 2007 Oct 29. PubMed 17975326 ↗
  • Javed M, Saleem A, Xaveria A, Akhtar MF. Daphnetin: A bioactive natural coumarin with diverse therapeutic potentials. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 29;13:993562. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.993562. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36249766 ↗
  • Singh L, Singh AP, Bhatti R. Mechanistic interplay of various mediators involved in mediating the neuroprotective effect of daphnetin. Pharmacol Rep. 2021 Oct;73(5):1220-1229. doi: 10.1007/s43440-021-00261-z. Epub 2021 Apr 16. PubMed 33860917 ↗
  • Chaudhary PK, Kim S, Kim S. Antiplatelet Effect of Daphnetin Is Regulated by cPLA2-Mediated Thromboxane A2 Generation in Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 17;24(6):5779. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065779. PubMed 36982853 ↗
  • Syed AM, Kundu S, Ram C, Kulhari U, Kumar A, Mugale MN, Mohapatra P, Murty US, Sahu BD. Up-regulation of Nrf2/HO-1 and inhibition of TGF-beta1/Smad2/3 signaling axis by daphnetin alleviates transverse aortic constriction-induced cardiac remodeling in mice. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022 Jun;186:17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.04.019. Epub 2022 May 2. PubMed 35513128 ↗
  • Yang F, Jiang X, Cao H, Shuai W, Zhang L, Wang G, Quan D, Jiang X. Daphnetin Preconditioning Decreases Cardiac Injury and Susceptibility to Ventricular Arrhythmia following Ischaemia-Reperfusion through the TLR4/MyD88/NF-Kappab Signalling Pathway. Pharmacology. 2021;106(7-8):369-383. doi: 10.1159/000513631. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PubMed 33902056 ↗
  • Yang Y, Sheng Q, Nie Z, Liu L, Zhang W, Chen G, Ye F, Shi L, Lv Z, Xie J, Wang D. Daphnetin inhibits spinal glial activation via Nrf2/HO-1/NF-kappaB signaling pathway and attenuates CFA-induced inflammatory pain. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Sep;98:107882. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107882. Epub 2021 Jun 26. PubMed 34182245 ↗
  • Du G, Tu H, Li X, Pei A, Chen J, Miao Z, Li J, Wang C, Xie H, Xu X, Zhao H. Daphnetin, a natural coumarin derivative, provides the neuroprotection against glutamate-induced toxicity in HT22 cells and ischemic brain injury. Neurochem Res. 2014 Feb;39(2):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11064-013-1218-6. Epub 2013 Dec 17. PubMed 24343531 ↗
  • Yu W, Wang H, Ying H, Yu Y, Chen D, Ge W, Shi L. Daphnetin attenuates microglial activation and proinflammatory factor production via multiple signaling pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. 2014 Jul;21(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 18. PubMed 24747094 ↗
  • Zhi J, Duan B, Pei J, Wu S, Wei J. Daphnetin protects hippocampal neurons from oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced injury. J Cell Biochem. 2019 Mar;120(3):4132-4139. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27698. Epub 2018 Sep 27. PubMed 30260007 ↗
  • Wang D, Zhu B, Liu X, Han Q, Ge W, Zhang W, Lu Y, Wu Q, Shi L. Daphnetin Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Through Regulating Heme Oxygenase-1. Neurochem Res. 2020 Apr;45(4):872-881. doi: 10.1007/s11064-020-02960-0. Epub 2020 Jan 16. PubMed 31950453 ↗
  • Yang L, Yang Q, Zhang K, Li YJ, Wu YM, Liu SB, Zheng LH, Zhao MG. Neuroprotective effects of daphnetin against NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity. Molecules. 2014 Sep 15;19(9):14542-55. doi: 10.3390/molecules190914542. PubMed 25225718 ↗
  • Yan L, Zhou X, Zhou X, Zhang Z, Luo HM. Neurotrophic effects of 7,8-dihydroxycoumarin in primary cultured rat cortical neurons. Neurosci Bull. 2012 Oct;28(5):493-8. doi: 10.1007/s12264-012-1233-7. Epub 2012 May 18. PubMed 22961470 ↗
  • Benjamin P, Zeestraten E, Lambert C, Ster IC, Williams OA, Lawrence AJ, Patel B, MacKinnon AD, Barrick TR, Markus HS. Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016 Jan;36(1):228-40. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113. PubMed 26036939 ↗
  • Markus HS, van Der Flier WM, Smith EE, Bath P, Biessels GJ, Briceno E, Brodtman A, Chabriat H, Chen C, de Leeuw FE, Egle M, Ganesh A, Georgakis MK, Gottesman RF, Kwon S, Launer L, Mok V, O'Brien J, Ottenhoff L, Pendlebury S, Richard E, Sachdev P, Schmidt R, Springer M, Tiedt S, Wardlaw JM, Verdelho A, Webb A, Werring D, Duering M, Levine D, Dichgans M. Framework for Clinical Trials in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (FINESSE): A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Nov 1;79(11):1187-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2262. PubMed 35969390 ↗
  • Pendlebury ST, Mariz J, Bull L, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. MoCA, ACE-R, and MMSE versus the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards Neuropsychological Battery after TIA and stroke. Stroke. 2012 Feb;43(2):464-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.633586. Epub 2011 Dec 8. PubMed 22156700 ↗
  • Ghafar MZAA, Miptah HN, O'Caoimh R. Cognitive screening instruments to identify vascular cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;34(8):1114-1127. doi: 10.1002/gps.5136. Epub 2019 May 16. PubMed 31050033 ↗
  • Smith EE, Biessels GJ, De Guio F, de Leeuw FE, Duchesne S, During M, Frayne R, Ikram MA, Jouvent E, MacIntosh BJ, Thrippleton MJ, Vernooij MW, Adams H, Backes WH, Ballerini L, Black SE, Chen C, Corriveau R, DeCarli C, Greenberg SM, Gurol ME, Ingrisch M, Job D, Lam BYK, Launer LJ, Linn J, McCreary CR, Mok VCT, Pantoni L, Pike GB, Ramirez J, Reijmer YD, Romero JR, Ropele S, Rost NS, Sachdev PS, Scott CJM, Seshadri S, Sharma M, Sourbron S, Steketee RME, Swartz RH, van Oostenbrugge R, van Osch M, van Rooden S, Viswanathan A, Werring D, Dichgans M, Wardlaw JM. Harmonizing brain magnetic resonance imaging methods for vascular contributions to neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019 Feb 26;11:191-204. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019 Dec. PubMed 30859119 ↗
  • Shi J, Wei M, Ni J, Sun F, Sun L, Wang J, Yu T, Wang K, Lv P, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Gao X, Gao X, Luo B, Mao S, Zhang B, Ren X, Yu F, Hu W, Yin P, Wu N, Liu X, Bi Q, Wang Y, Tian J; CHASE Study Group. Tianzhi granule improves cognition and BPSD of vascular dementia: a randomized controlled trial. J Transl Med. 2020 Feb 13;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02232-z. PubMed 32054507 ↗
  • Smith EE. Clinical presentations and epidemiology of vascular dementia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017 Jun 1;131(11):1059-1068. doi: 10.1042/CS20160607. PubMed 28515342 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2025 to primary completion in Jul 2025, 0 months.

Of 96 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cerebrovascular Disorders, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 68. This study's 0 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 111 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 68.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2024
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
StartActual
Jul 7, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jul 7, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 7, 2027
Last update
Aug 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06507488
Lead sponsor
First People's Hospital of Shenyang
Collaborators
Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang
Responsible party
Dr. Yi Sui (vice president, Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
Start date
Jul 7, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 7, 2025
Completion
Jul 7, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Yi Sui, MD PhD
Contact
jakeyisui@icloud.com
+86 24 86861329
Mingming Dong, MD
Contact
dongming_ming@126.com
+86 24 86861329
Yi Sui, MD PhD
principal investigator · The Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang, China Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion