An interventional study of Dyadic Life Review in Cancer, sponsored by University of Rochester. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.
Sponsored by University of Rochester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of a pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) comparing Dyadic Life Review (DLR) intervention in older adults with advanced cancer and their caregivers to Care-as-Usual (CAU) group, which involves a referral to social work.
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of a pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) comparing Dyadic Life Review (DLR) intervention in older adults with advanced cancer and their caregivers to Care-as-Usual (CAU) group, which involves a referral to social work. The study will enroll dyads (pairs) of caregivers and older patients with advanced cancer and dyads of caregivers and patients with advanced cancer. A previous single-arm study was performed testing the feasibility of the adapted DLR intervention in older adults with advanced cancer and their caregivers. The single-arm pilot demonstrated DLR was feasible and acceptable by both patients and caregivers. This innovative pilot study will gather data to test the feasibility of a pilot and examine pre-post intervention changes in caregiver psychological distress.
9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.
Browse Neoplasms studies →University of Rochester is the lead sponsor of 715 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.
Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:
Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:
The Dyadic Life Review Arm (DLR) consists of 8 sessions delivered by a trained licensed clinician. Each session facilitates a recall of each phase of life. The patient and caregiver will each be asked structured questions to prompt reminiscence of memories from that phase of life. Interventionists are able to use clinical judgment to prompt further or ask follow-up questions or reflections. Additionally, the patient and caregiver will be asked to respond to the other dyad member's memory or reflection. Each session will have flexibility for clinical judgement.
Behavioral: Dyadic Life Review
The Care-As-Usual (CAU) arm will follow current practices for responding to patient distress. The CAU for patients involves a supportive follow-up phone call from the social work team to further assess the patient's experience of distress. In some instances, the social worker will use their clinical judgement to further refer the patient to community resources to support distress. The number of phone calls and any subsequent community referrals or appointments related to distress that occur will be tracked.
DLR is an intervention that will promote relationship closeness, communication, and psychological distress in both older adults and caregivers.
Also known as: DLR
DLR Intervention Enrollment Rate
Evaluate the feasibility of DLR in older patients and caregivers based on enrollment rate.
Time frame: 18 weeks
DLR Intervention Retention Rate
Evaluate the feasibility of DLR in older patients and caregivers based on retention rate.
Time frame: 18 weeks
Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale
Quality of relationship with care-receiver: assesses quality of relationship between participant and family member and has demonstrated valid scores across several relationship types, including spouses and other family members. This is a 12-item scale, rated from 1-7 (1=strongly agree, 7=strongly disagree), with a possible total of 84; a higher score indicates a higher level of closeness.
Time frame: 18 weeks
Communication Satisfaction Scale
The observation of each partner's level of satisfaction with various aspects of their communication. This is a 12-item scale, rated from 1-5 (1=not at all satisfied, 5=extremely satisfied), with a possible total of 60; a higher score indicates greater satisfaction with communication.
Time frame: 18 weeks
Distress Thermometer
A self-report measure to capture distress and identify a list of sources of that distress. This is a 10-item scale, rated from 0-10 (0=no distress, 10=severe distress), with a possible total of 10; a higher score indicates greater distress.
Time frame: 18 weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Rochester