ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06497998EGG_SENSORUpdated Jul 12, 2024

EGG Sensor for Oocyte Characterization

An interventional study of Mechanical characterization in Infertility, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 43 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-12.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 43 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

While intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has made significant progress in the treatment of male infertility, the cumulative delivery rate is less than 30%, and birth is sometimes only achieved after several transfers. This success rate, combined with the possibility of repeated transfer failures, causes great distress, impacting couples' personal, social, and professional lives. These failures also have a significant economic impact on society and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) laboratories, including costs related to personnel, consumables, and cryopreservation activities.

Among the factors influencing the success of ICSI, the quality of the oocyte is paramount. Identifying mature oocytes with high birth potential is therefore a crucial step in any attempt.

At present, oocyte selection is mainly based on subjective visual morphological criteria, primarily limited to the stage of meiotic maturation. Various objective selection criteria are currently being tested, such as markers in follicular fluid or the transcriptome of cumulus and granulosa cells.

Mechanical oocyte characterization is another objective approach to assessing oocyte quality. EGG Sensor is a reliable, cost-effective platform that measures forces ranging from a few nanonewtons to a few micronewtons in a liquid medium on living cells. It enables the characterization of the mechanical behavior of oocytes (kinetic measurements of forces resulting from EGG sensor action).

The EGG sensor has been evaluated, enabling the EGG platform to be duplicated at the ART center of the Besançon University Hospital, making measurement and calibration more reliable, and allowing for the characterization of a series of oocytes excluded from the ICSI procedure.

The preclinical stages in the development of the EGG sensor have thus been validated. The next stage of development is to validate the device in an operational environment. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the mechanical qualification of oocytes by the EGG sensor in real-life conditions during an ICSI-type ART attempt.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility

Browse trials for

03

In context

Infertility

2,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 405 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 120 across 1,722 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon is the lead sponsor of 449 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 43 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • women between 18 and 43 years old.
  • Candidates for in vitro fertilization with ICSI treatment
  • Male infertility (with the exception of testicular sperm extraction (TESA or MESA), donation of sperm and oocytes).
  • Normal mobility and morphology of sperm selected for ICSI.
  • Agreement given by the multidisciplinary team of the ART center (patients considered to have a "good prognosis" at the conclusion of the meeting, with normal ovarian reserve (follicular count between 15 and 25), and candidates for single embryo transfer.
  • Consenting to the EGG sensor examination of 50% of mature oocytes collected.
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Affiliated to the French social security system (including CMU).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age \< 18 years
  • age > 43 years
  • Infertility of female origin (severe endometriosis, genetic origin, uterine malformations that may interfere with implantation, etc.).
  • Opposition of the multidisciplinary team of the ART center and/or patients with poor or average prognosis at the conclusion of the multidisciplinary ART meeting.
  • Person under legal protection and/or unlikely to cooperate with the study and/or poor cooperation anticipated by the investigator
  • Subject without health insurance
  • Subject is in the exclusion period of another study or listed in the "volunteers' registry
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EGG sensor

    Mechanical characterization is performed using a glass indenter that applies a load to the oocyte. The indenter is a sterile, single-use, blunt-edged glass cylinder with a flat support end featuring a small foam formation, approximately the diameter of a micropipette. Except for the mechanical characterization, all oocytes are managed similarly according to validated procedures: in the same location, under the same metrological constraints (temperature and pH (potential of hydrogen) monitoring), and are handled by the same competent ART personnel.

    Device: Mechanical characterization

  • No intervention
    Standard

    Usual ICSI procedures

Interventions

  • DeviceMechanical characterization

    The oocyte is placed in a culture dish with IVF culture medium. This procedure is similar to that used in the ICSI procedure, except that the injection pipette is replaced by a glass indenter. The indenter (sterile, single-use, blunt-edged glass cylinder, L:16mm, ø:0.85mm, mass:8mg) is completely decoupled from the micromanipulation and microinjection platform and driven by the principle of a magnetic spring with negative stiffness. The oocyte is immobilized using a restraining pipette to prevent unwanted movement during measurement. The main objective is to investigate the prognostic value of parameters derived from kinetic measurements of microforces on mature human oocytes in the context of IVF with ICSI. On each oocyte the mechanical testing is divided in 4 successive loading unloading phase to measure: * global elasticity of the oocyte. * global viscosity behaviour of the oocyte. * local elasticity of the oocyte. * local viscosity behaviour of the pellucid membrane.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in the global elasticity of the oocyte depending on whether or not it results in a live birth.

    Global elasticity obtained from a loading and unloading test at constant speed using a large flat shape to compress it. The output is a curve related to the force applied to the oocyte versus the indentation depth. This curve is representative of the global oocyte elasticity.

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Differences in the global viscosity behaviour of the oocyte depending on whether or not it results in a live birth

    Global viscosity behaviour obtained from a loading test at constant speed followed by keeping the indentation depth. In this test, we are also using the large flat shape of indenter tip.The output is a curve related to the force applied to the oocyte versus time that quantify the global relaxation phenomenon of the oocyte.

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. Differences in the local elasticity of the oocyte depending on whether or not it results in a live birth

    Local elasticity obtained from a loading and unloading test at constant speed using a sharp shape in order to specifically characterize pellucid membrane. The output is a curve related to the force applied to the oocyte versus the indentation depth. This curve is representative of the pellucide membrane elasticity.

    Time frame: 36 months

  4. Differences in the local viscosity of the pellucid membrane depending on whether or not it results in a live birth

    Local viscosity behaviour of the pellucid membrane obtained from a loading test at constant speed followed by keeping the indentation depth. In this test, we are also using the sharp shape of indenter tip.The output is a curve related to the force applied to the oocyte versus time that mainly quantify the local relaxation phenomenon of the pellucid membrane.

    Time frame: 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences in the mechanical characterization of an oocyte depending on whether or not it results in an early or late miscarriage.

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Differences in the mechanical characterization of an oocyte depending on whether or not it results in a clinical pregnancy.

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. Differences in the mechanical characterization of an oocyte depending on whether or not it results in a biochemical pregnancy.

    Time frame: 36 months

  4. Morphological characterization of mature oocytes (included in the ICSI procedure) and of abnormal or immature oocytes (excluded from the ICSI procedure).

    Time frame: On the day the IVF with ICSI is performed

  5. Mechanical characterization of abnormal or immature oocytes (excluded from the ICSI procedure) from the same cohort.

    Time frame: On the day the IVF with ICSI is performed

  6. Associations between oocytes' mechanical characteristics and patients' clinical and demographic characteristics.

    Patients' clinical and demographic data include age, medical history (smoking, fertility status), the number of obtained oocytes..

    Time frame: 36 months

  7. Biochemical pregnancy rates

    Time frame: 36 months

  8. Early and late miscarriages rates

    Time frame: 36 months

  9. Clinical pregnancy rates

    Time frame: 36 months

  10. Live births rates

    Time frame: 36 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Immediately following publication. No end date

Access criteria: Researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal approved by our research team

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2024; primary completion for Sep 2027, 36 months later.

Of 498 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Infertility, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 541 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 27, 2024
First posted
Jul 12, 2024
StartEst.
Sep 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2027
Last update
Jul 12, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06497998
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2024
Start date
Sep 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 12, 2024

Study contacts

Christophe Roux, MD, PhD
Contact
christophe.roux@univ-fcomte.fr
33 3 81 21 81 27

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion