ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06490172Updated Jan 27, 2026

Shock Wave Therapy as a Treatment Intervention for Frozen Shoulder

An interventional study of Shock wave therapy in Shoulder Pain and Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder, sponsored by University of Stirling. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-27.

Sponsored by University of Stirling · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a debilitating condition that causes global restriction and pain at the glenohumeral joint. Physiotherapy treatment is often first line treatment management. Patients with failed conservative management are commonly referred to a specialist consultant for further treatment. Over the last 20 years, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has gained popularity as a treatment for various orthopaedic presentations, including chronic soft tissue conditions, being non-invasive, resulting in good outcomes with minimal side effects. There is a lack of evidence on the clinical effectiveness of ESWT for chronic AC following failed conservative treatments, with the available literature reporting positive outcomes, however, with heterogeneity in treatment protocols. This proposed study aims to explore the feasibility of a full trial of ESWT as a treatment for AC using a standardised treatment protocol, and clinical effects on outcomes of pain, function and shoulder joint range of movement in persons with chronic adhesive capsulitis.

A Delphi study will first explore expert opinion for the optimum treatment protocol of ESWT as a treatment for chronic AC, followed by a mixed methods explanatory sequential study that includes a pilot trial with nested qualitative interviews. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, numerical pain rating scale, EuroQol-5D, and digital goniometer will be used to measure self-reported pain and function, pain, health-related quality of life, and shoulder joint range of movement, respectively. Quantitative data will be analysed by descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews. Interview data will be analysed using Braun and Clarke's inductive thematic analysis approach. The study will be conducted in an out-patient clinical setting in a community health hub facility, with patients recruited from an NHS Orthopaedics waitlist. Data collection is planned over a nine month period. This study is not affiliated with funding streams.

Read the detailed description

Shoulder AC, commonly known as frozen shoulder, is a self-limiting condition that affects three to five percent of the population and up to 20 to 30 percent in persons with diabetes mellitus. Its aetiology is still being understood with evidence supporting a chronic state of low-grade inflammation and elevation of pro-inflammatory lipoproteins resulting in fibrotic changes in the glenohumeral capsule. This results in pain, reduced shoulder range of movement (ROM) and functional disability that can spontaneously resolve between one to three years, with 40 percent reporting persistent symptoms at long-term follow up (mean follow up time 4.4 years, range 2 - 20 years). AC can occur spontaneously, as a primary insidious onset, or secondary, following a post-traumatic event such as shoulder surgery or rotator cuff injury. Treatment for AC commonly consists of conservative management interventions including pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection, with referral to secondary care if symptoms persist for interventions such as manipulation under anaesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release.

The treatment interventions or surgical procedures for AC may not always be effective or suitable for all patients due to conditions that may increase risk of complications such as respiratory conditions, allergies, previous surgery complications, co-morbidities (e.g., liver, cardiovascular and kidney disease), and patient choice. Untreated conditions and long-wait times can lead to chronicity further impacting an individual's health and increasing costs to the National Health Service (NHS). Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are estimated to cost to the British government an estimated £7 billion per year, accounting for one third of the NHS budget. In a United Kingdom (UK) health survey evaluating the prevalence of chronic pain (duration of pain 12 weeks or more), labelled MSK conditions as a long-lasting illness, accounting for 81 percent of participants, and of this, 24 percent involving the shoulder. Chronic MSK pain has also been linked to 17.5 percent of work absences, anxiety, depression, and health inequalities.

Over the last 20 years, EWST, has gained popularity as a treatment modality for orthopaedics conditions such as chronic tendinopathies. EWST can be generated as focused high- energy (>0.60 millijoules (mj)/mm2) shock waves or emitted as radial low (\<0.08 mJ/mm2) to medium-energy (\<0.28 mJ/mm2) shock waves. ESWT stimulates soft tissue healing via a biological response of mechanotransduction through neovascularisation, reduction of tendon matrix inflammatory markers such as metalloproteinases and interleukins, assists with the migration and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, and enhances the natural healing microenvironment. To date, therapeutic EWST has been shown to be clinically effective to treat bone non-unions, chronic soft tissue disorders such as tendinopathies and recalcitrant MSK conditions commonly involving the supraspinatus muscle tendon, patellar tendon, Achilles tendon and plantar fascia, and has become a favourable alternative treatment for individuals who have exhausted conventional conservative interventions.

A review of the literature exploring the use of ESWT as a treatment for chronic AC found seven randomised control trials (RCT) reporting significant improvements in function, pain and shoulder ROM in groups that received ESWT. The literature found improvements in all outcomes within 12 weeks when compared to a control group.

Although the literature demonstrates positive outcomes, due to the small number of studies, small sample sizes, and heterogeneity of treatment protocols, there is insufficient evidence for it to be a recommended treatment for AC by national health guidelines (e.g., National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). Further research is therefore required to determine the acceptability and viability of this intervention in the UK healthcare framework, with potential to conduct a full-scale RCT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shoulder Pain
  • Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder

Keywords

  • shock wave therapy
  • frozen shoulder
  • adhesive capsulitis
  • shoulder pain
  • physiotherapy
  • lithotripsy
03

In context

Shoulder Pain

735 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Pain; 167 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 18 is below the median of 60 across 587 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Pain.

Browse Shoulder Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Stirling is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants aged 18 years and older.
  2. Diagnosis of primary or secondary shoulder AC of a greater than three-month duration.
  3. Diagnosis of AC by an orthopaedic consultant or upper limb Advanced Practice Physiotherapist.
  4. Participants can attend an outpatient rural physiotherapy department to receive shockwave therapy intervention.
  5. They understand English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who have bilateral shoulder pain, capsular tightness, calcific rotator cuff tendinitis, rotator cuff tear (atraumatic or traumatic), previous surgery on the affected shoulder, shoulder fracture, dislocation or subluxation, glenohumeral or acromioclavicular arthritis, , inflammatory disorders, neuromuscular disorders, presence of severe osteoporosis, pulmonary diseases, implanted pacemaker and pregnancy.
  2. They have conditions related to ESWT (e.g., pregnancy, pacemaker, metal work or joint replacement near the treatment site, blood clotting disorder, use of anti-coagulants, less than six weeks of receiving a injection over treatment site, malignancy, local infection or open wounds, skeletal growth places, under 18 years old).
  3. Symptom duration less than 12 weeks.
  4. Absent or altered skin sensation.
  5. They are unable to give full .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Delphi Study

    The survey will be re-circulated a minimum of three, and maximum of four rounds, with an aim for a minimum of 20 participants and response rate of greater than 70 percent per round. The results will be collected and collated at each round to determine a consensus amongst shoulder specialists for further review. This information will be used to guide the treatment protocol in phase two.

  • Experimental
    Shock wave therapy quantitative data collection and analysis

    This phase will involve the piloting of the shock wave therapy protocol determined by the results collected in phase one Delphi study Following participant consent, the research healthcare practitioner will provide patient reported outcome measure questionnaires for the participant to complete independently to measure baseline data. This will occur at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks following shock wave therapy treatment.

    Device: Shock wave therapy

  • No intervention
    Qualitative semi-structured interviews

    All participants in phase 2 and those who declined participation in the quantitative study at the recruitment stage will be invited to take part in semi-structured qualitative interviews of a duration of 30 - 45 minutes. The interview protocol and questions will be developed based on the findings of the quantitative data analysis. Interviews will take place approximately 12 weeks from last ESWT treatment.

Interventions

  • DeviceShock wave therapy

    Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and feasibility as treatment for adhesive capsulitis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment and rejection rate

    Estimate the proportion of patients screened who meet the eligibility criteria. This will be analysed with descriptive statistics using IBM SPSS Statistical Software. This will be displayed as a numerical value with standard deviation

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Retention rate

    Adherence and compliance to intervention and home exercise programme, follow-up and drops out. This will be analysed with descriptive statistics using IBM SPSS Statistical Software. This will be displayed as a numerical value with standard deviation

    Time frame: 18 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

    Self-reported pain and function in shoulder conditions. 13 item questionnaire that assesses two domains, pain and disability, that best represents their shoulder symptoms over a week. The scale is scored from a zero, 'no pain / no difficulty,' to 10, 'worst pain imaginable / so difficult requires help', with higher scores indicating increase impairment or disability, and can be used to monitor change over time. A difference of eight points is the minimal detectable change for clinical significance.

    Time frame: 0, 6, and 12 weeks.

  2. Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    One-dimensional tool used to measure pain both at rest and during movement. It is a 11-point scale for self-reported pain, zero meaning 'no pain' to 10 'extreme pain / worse pain possible,' at the time the questionnaire is administered and has been found to be more versatile being delivered in both verbal and written formats. Minimal clinical difference of change sore for general conditions is 3.0cm, and rotator cuff pain is 1.4cm on scale.

    Time frame: 0, 6, and 12 weeks.

  3. EuroQoL-5D-5L

    Questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life. It measures five dimensions of health, mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression, on a five-level scale. A score of one across all five categories represents the best possible health, whereas a score of five across all five categories represents the worst health status. The EQ-5D-5L also includes a perceived health status demonstrated as a visual analogue scale with grade ranging from zero, the worst possible health status, to 100, the best possible health status.

    Time frame: 0, 6, and 12 weeks.

  4. Digital Goniometry

    A digital goniometer or smart phone application digital inclinometer will be used to measure shoulder joint passive ROM.

    Time frame: 0, 6, and 12 weeks.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zreik NH, Malik RA, Charalambous CP. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and diabetes: a meta-analysis of prevalence. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016 May 19;6(1):26-34. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.1.026. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar. PubMed 27331029 ↗
  • Le HV, Lee SJ, Nazarian A, Rodriguez EK. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Apr;9(2):75-84. doi: 10.1177/1758573216676786. Epub 2016 Nov 7. PubMed 28405218 ↗
  • Kraal T, Lubbers J, van den Bekerom MPJ, Alessie J, van Kooyk Y, Eygendaal D, Koorevaar RCT. The puzzling pathophysiology of frozen shoulders - a scoping review. J Exp Orthop. 2020 Nov 18;7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00307-w. PubMed 33205235 ↗
  • Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, Carr AJ. Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Nov 12. PubMed 17993282 ↗
  • NICE (2017) Scenario: frozen shoulder. Available: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/shoulder-pain/management/frozen-shoulder/ [Accessed: 04 November 2022].
  • Dennis, L., Brealey, S., Rangan, A., Rookmoneea, M. and Watson, J. (2010) Managing idiopathic frozen shoulder: a survey of health professionals' current practice and research priorities. Shoulder and Elbow, 2 (4), pp. 294-300.
  • Smith G, D'Cruz JR, Goldman J. General Anesthesia for Surgeons. 2023 Aug 5. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493199/ PubMed 29630251 ↗
  • Wang CJ. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Mar 20;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-11. PubMed 22433113 ↗
  • Taylor J, Dunkerley S, Silver D, Redfern A, Talbot N, Sharpe I, Guyver P. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for refractory Achilles tendinopathy: A prospective audit with 2-year follow up. Foot (Edinb). 2016 Mar;26:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 31. PubMed 26802946 ↗
  • Lohrer H, Nauck T, Dorn-Lange NV, Scholl J, Vester JC. Comparison of radial versus focused extracorporeal shock waves in plantar fasciitis using functional measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Jan;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0001. PubMed 20067715 ↗
  • Waugh CM, Morrissey D, Jones E, Riley GP, Langberg H, Screen HR. In vivo biological response to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in human tendinopathy. Eur Cell Mater. 2015 May 15;29:268-80; discussion 280. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v029a20. PubMed 25978115 ↗
  • Chen CY, Hu CC, Weng PW, Huang YM, Chiang CJ, Chen CH, Tsuang YH, Yang RS, Sun JS, Cheng CK. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy improves short-term functional outcomes of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1843-1851. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.010. PubMed 25441567 ↗
  • El Naggar TEDM, Maaty AIE, Mohamed AE. Effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy versus ultrasound-guided low-dose intra-articular steroid injection in improving shoulder pain, function, and range of motion in diabetic patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1300-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.005. PubMed 32553435 ↗
  • Hameedi, I.A., Shadmehr, A., Malmir, K., Fereydounnia, S. and Shiravi, Z. (2022) Comparison of application of the radial vs. focused probes of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on pain, range of motion and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. NeuroQuantology, 20 (6), pp. 2726.
  • Hussein, A.Z. and Donatelli, R.A. (2016) The efficacy of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy in shoulder adhesive capsulitis: a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical study. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 18 (1), pp. 63-76.
  • Lee S, Lee S, Jeong M, Oh H, Lee K. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1907-1909. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1907. Epub 2017 Nov 24. PubMed 29200621 ↗
  • Saldiran TC, Yazgan P, Akgol AC, Mutluay FK. Radial shock-wave therapy for frozen shoulder patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot trial comparing two different energy levels. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Jun;58(3):412-422. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07087-3. Epub 2022 Feb 22. PubMed 35191654 ↗
  • Vahdatpour B, Taheri P, Zade AZ, Moradian S. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in frozen shoulder. Int J Prev Med. 2014 Jul;5(7):875-81. PubMed 25104999 ↗
  • Eubank BH, Mohtadi NG, Lafave MR, Wiley JP, Bois AJ, Boorman RS, Sheps DM. Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 20;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8. PubMed 27206853 ↗
  • Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239. PubMed 27777223 ↗
  • Lewis M, Bromley K, Sutton CJ, McCray G, Myers HL, Lancaster GA. Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: the hypothesis test strikes back! Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Feb 3;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x. PubMed 33536076 ↗
  • Julious, S.A. (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4 (4), pp. 287-291.
  • Creswell, J. and Plano Clark, V. (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781412993654&uid=none
  • Creswell, J. (2014) Research design. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
  • EMS - Dolorclast (2021) Guided dolarclast therapy. Available: https://www.ems-dolorclast.com/sites/default/files/2021-11/FA-720_EN_Rev_B_GDT%20Sales%20Aid_Ed_07-2021_Light%20%281%29.pdf [Accessed: 09 February 2024].
  • PHE (2019) Musculoskeletal health: a 5 year strategic framework for prevention across the lifecourse. London: Public Health England (PHE). Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/810348/Musculoskeletal_Health_5_year_strategy.pdf [Accessed: 15 December 2022].
  • PHE (2017) Chronic pain in adults 2017: health survey for england. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/940858/Chronic_Pain_Report.pdf [Accessed: 04 November 2022].
  • OHID (2022) Musculoskeletal health: applying All Our Health. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/musculoskeletal-health-applying-all-our-health/musculoskeletal-health-applying-all-our-health#fn:1 [Accessed: 08 November 2022].
  • Versus Arthritis (2021) The state of musculoskeletal health 2021: arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions in numbers. Available: https://www.versusarthritis.org/media/24653/state-of-msk-health2-2021.pdf [Accessed: 15 November 2022].

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06490172
Lead sponsor
University of Stirling
Responsible party
Crystal Reno (Professional Clinical Doctorate Student, University of Stirling) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 8, 2024
Start date
May 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 27, 2026

Study contacts

Crystal Reno, MSc, DPT
Contact
c.a.reno@stir.ac.uk
+44 1786 466340
University of Stirling
Contact
+44 1786 466340
Crystal Reno
principal investigator · University of Stirling

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion