An interventional study of Gene PilotLX in Cancer, sponsored by Fox Chase Cancer Center. Active, not recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.
Sponsored by Fox Chase Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
This is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of an electronic health decision support tool called Gene PilotLX to increase informed decision making regarding hereditary risk information from tumor genomic profiling (TGP) test among Latinx cancer patients recruited at four cancer centers.
The use of multi-gene tumor genomic profiling (TGP) to examine a patient's tumor for targetable mutations is a cornerstone of personalized oncology. Providers are required to communicate TGP risks to patients and elicit patient preferences for managing information (i.e., "opt out" or have genetic counseling) because of the possibility of uncovering secondary hereditary cancer risks found on this test. Yet barriers exist to support optimal decision-making. Limited study of genetic links to cancer has been done with Latinx patients making them an important understudied group to target for genetic decision support. Shared cultural values among Latinx individuals such as familismo (family loyalty) and fatalismo (fatedness) may influence how patients approach cancer risk assessment and genetics and language and acculturation barriers, access and affordability, deportation risks, medical mistrust and low genetic knowledge impact decision making. As a result, Latinx patients are less likely to participate in clinical genetic testing. Adding to this vulnerability is the fact that many oncologists may not have a good understanding of how to effectively communicate secondary hereditary risks to Latinx patients. This leaves Latinx patients without the support they need to make good decisions about what they would want to do about secondary results from TGP that is in line with their needs, preferences and values.
eHealth interventions can promote health behavior change when developed with targeted messages, but many fall short if they do not effectively address the core barriers to a health decision. Gene PilotLX was developed using commercial marketing techniques to ensure saliency. Using perceptual mapping and vector message modeling, the investigators have shown in our parent Gene Pilot study that was conducted among AA/Black cancer patients that this approach provides a superior methodology for developing effective, persuasive messages that result in significant behavior and decisional conflict changes.
A fully powered randomized controlled trial will be conducted with 232 Latinx cancer patients at four oncology sites to evaluate the efficacy of Gene PilotLX,an electronic health decision support tool. Participants will be randomized either to intervention arm and watch Gene PilotLX or usual arm and review patient information about TGP presented in a written document (pdf). All participants will complete three assessments: baseline, immediate post intervention, and 1-3-month surveys.
9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 239 is above the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.
Browse Neoplasms studies →Fox Chase Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 211 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.
Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (53%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Self-identified Latinx patients who:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with hematologic/liquid cancers (leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, etc.)
Gene PilotLX is an eHealth decision support tool that is designed to empower Latinx cancer patients to decide their preferences for learning about secondary genetic information, communicate those preferences to their doctors, and provide the opportunity to discuss information with their families or others to feel they have made an informed decision. The tool will be available in both English and Spanish. It is web-based, has a voice-over, and is easy to navigate, with simple forward and backward buttons. Each section includes a different aspect of tumor genomic profiling, from basic information about what the test is and what the pros and cons are of the test, to culturally specific potential barriers or benefits to learning hereditary results. At the end, the tool provides tailored potential questions for a doctor that users can choose, which are summarized in a "score card" that can be printed or emailed.
Other: Gene PilotLX
Participants in the control arm will be provided a brochure about tumor genomic profiling (TGP) secondary hereditary risks, and what patients can decide about getting that information, including the pros and cons. It is literacy appropriate, incorporates visuals, and will also be offered in both English and Spanish.
eHealth decision making tool regarding tumor genomic profiling
Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale
PrepDM Scale measures preparedness of patient to make a decision (10 items) regarding a hereditary risk from tumor genomic profiling (TGP) on a 1 "not at all" to 5 "a great deal" scale. Higher means indicated higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Time frame: Post-test (can occur on same day as baseline, day 1) and 1-3 month follow-up
Decisional Conflict: Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) scale
16- item measure to determine patient clarity on the risks and benefits of tumor genomic profiling (TGP) testing and hereditary risk information from TGP. Items are given a score value of: 0= 'strongly agree'; 2= 'neither agree nor disagree'; 3= 'disagree'; 4= 'strongly disagree' TOTAL SCORE 16 items are: a) summed; b) divided by 16; and c) multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0 \[no decisional conflict\] to 100 \[extremely high decisional conflict\]
Time frame: Post-test (can occur on same day as baseline, day 1) and 1-3 month follow-up
Communication of preferences to doctor related to pursuing hereditary cancer risk information from TGP
This is a single dichotomous item created for the study: 'Have you talked with a doctor about secondary hereditary results from TGP testing'?('Yes', 'No'). If 'Yes' is selected, 7 different topics for discussion with doctor are listed, including 'other' as open question.
Time frame: 1-3 month follow up
Communication of preferences with family related to pursuing hereditary cancer risk information from TGP
This is a single dichotomous item created for the study: 'Have you talked about secondary hereditary results from TGP testing with your family, friends or spouse/partner'? ('Yes', 'No'). If 'Yes' is selected, 7 different topics for discussion with family are listed, including 'other' as open question.
Time frame: 1-3 month follow up
Perception of Tumor Genomic Profiling (TGP)
18 statements related to benefits and concerns of TGP were developed as part of formative work (focus group with patients) for our previous work with AA/Black cancer patients and are related to beliefs, perceived barriers and benefits of TGP testing; 0-10 agreement scale when 0 is 'strongly disagree' and 10 'strongly agree'. Perceptual maps will be generated from the survey responses. Perceptual mapping methods developed by co-PI Bass use multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis to create 3-Dimensional representations of how participants conceptualizes a decision and then message vector modeling techniques are used to design messages that will be most likely to persuade participants to make that decision. This method will be used to design messages for Gene PilotLX, the eHealth decision aid for Latinx cancer patients.
Time frame: Baseline (day1) and 1-3 month follow up
Plan to share: No
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Fox Chase Cancer Center