CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06461403Updated Jun 8, 2026

Inhaler Trainer Efficacy Study

An interventional study of Inhaler Trainer System and Initial Inhaler Use Assessment in Asthma, Copd and Acute Exacerbation of COPD, sponsored by Koronis Biomedical Technologies. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by Koronis Biomedical Technologies · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This will be a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. The investigators aim to determine the feasibility of and efficacy of the Inhaler Trainer Device for ongoing inhaler skill training.

The research team will enroll 140 patients from the inpatient or outpatient setting from the University of Chicago Medicine over the course of up to 12 months. Participants will complete assessments, a lung function test via spirometry, and inhaler education via either the Inhaler Trainer Device learning program or Brief Intervention.

All participants will return at 6 weeks (window of +/- one week) post-initial inhaler education for an in-person evaluation of their inhaler skills, lung function, and acute care utilization. Finally, a post-study semi-structured interview will be conducted to gather feedback on the device after the 6-week visit has been completed.

Read the detailed description

The research team will enroll 140 patients from the inpatient or outpatient setting from the University of Chicago Medicine inpatient services, COPD/APN clinic, general medicine clinic, and/or Pulmonary clinic until all participants have been enrolled (approximately over the course of 12 months).

Patients will be randomized into one of two treatment conditions: one including use of the inhaler training device and one with our standard brief intervention.

After obtaining informed consent, participants will complete assessments, including a lung function test via spirometry, and inhaler education via either the Inhaler Trainer Device learning program or standard education techniques. Participants randomized to the inhaler training device arm will be trained on how to use their inhaler and the inhaler trainer device. The Inhaler Trainer Device will monitor the patient's inspiratory waveform to confirm technique compliance based on objective metrics and provide feedback on how to better perform technique.

Participants will continue to use their inhaled medications with the inhaler trainer device for 6 weeks post-baseline. They will return at 6 weeks post-initial instruction for an in-person evaluation of their inhaler skills, lung function, and acute care utilization. Finally, a post-study semi-structured interview will be conducted to gather feedback on the device after the 6-week visit has been completed. This interview will occur either during the 6-week follow-up visit or at a later time via phone call or zoom call. In the interview, a standard elicitation framework guided by the Integrative Model (IM) of Behavioral Prediction and Change will be used to generate feedback on training experience. The research team will also prompt participants to give feedback on the design, content, and functionality of the inhaler and training system. Additional prompts and questions will be used to ensure that information is provided that speaks to participants' perceptions of the positive and negative consequences related to using the trainer.

The statistical team at the University of Chicago will conduct analyses including descriptive summaries using means, medians, proportions, scatterplots, and histograms to describe the data. McNemar's chi-squared tests will be used to compare 30-day follow-up and inhaler misuse (≤10/12 steps correct) post-education vs. baseline. To model over time, we will use generalized linear mixed method (GLMM) or generalized estimating equations (GEE). A two-tailed p-value less than 0.05 will define statistical significance. The sample size was powered on the primary outcome in Aim 1 for difference in correct MDI use (>75% steps correct) between baseline and at 6 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma
  • Copd
  • Acute Exacerbation of COPD
03

In context

Asthma

3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 507 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 83 across 2,752 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Koronis Biomedical Technologies is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-85
  • Physician diagnosis of COPD or asthma
  • Has been prescribed or is being prescribed one of the inhalers listed below (DPI inhaler product, Active pharmaceutical ingredient):

    1. Serevent®Diskus®(GSK), Salmeterol
    2. Incruse Ellipta (GSK), Umeclidinium
    3. Spiriva Handihaler (BIP),Tiotropium
    4. Tudorza Pressair (AstraZeneca), Aclidinium
  • Inexperienced with inhaler trainer device (defined by never having had inhaler training using an auxiliary tool besides an actual inhaler and spacer)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physician declines to provide assent
  • Patient unable to provide consent (e.g., history of cognitive impairment, unable to understand English) or declines to provide consent
  • Does not meet inclusion criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Inhaler Trainer Device

    The Inhaler Trainer Device will monitor patients' inspiratory waveform to confirm technique compliance based on objective metrics and provide feedback on how to better perform technique. This intervention utilizes an instrumented training inhaler capable of accurately measuring the real-time inspiratory airflow achieved by the user when they perform their inhale maneuver. If a user's inspiratory flow fails to produce an inspiratory waveform with sufficient airflow parameters, the inhaler device may not optimally aerosolize the medication, and the delivered dosage to the lung will be negatively affected. The device measures the most important flow parameters in the users' real-time inspiration performance and translates them into an estimation of the dose delivered to the lung, based on detailed characterization of the user's inhaler product.

    Device: Inhaler Trainer System · Other: Initial Inhaler Use Assessment · Other: Inhaler Use Instruction

  • Active comparator
    Brief Interventions (BI)

    During inpatient admission, participants randomized to the BI condition will receive the following: First, they will undergo an initial assessment of their respiratory inhaler technique using device-specific checklists. Participants will then be given step-by-step verbal instructions and a copy of written instructions by the trained educator describing appropriate inhaler technique for their respiratory inhalers. The educator will not demonstrate the appropriate use of each inhaler to the patient, though the educator will be free to answer questions about appropriate use if posed by the study subject.

    Other: Initial Inhaler Use Assessment · Other: Inhaler Use Instruction

Interventions

  • DeviceInhaler Trainer System

    The system consists of an instrumented training inhaler capable of accurately measuring the real-time inspiratory airflow achieved by the user when they perform their inhale maneuver. The inhaler trainer system consists of a detachable/disposable mouthpiece and a reusable electronics module. The electronics module measures flow/pressure achieved by the patient and wirelessly transmits this data to a PC. The PC software analyzes the real-time inhalation flow data to enable the monitoring of the following quantities: Flow Rate, Duration, and Maximum Pressure Slope. These quantities will be used in the computation of the assessment metric, providing the user with real-time feedback about their inhalation technique. In addition, the software includes features to support the human study and provides fully functional inhaler education features for the expert test evaluators.

  • OtherInitial Inhaler Use Assessment

    Patients will undergo an initial assessment of their respiratory inhaler technique for their respiratory inhaler devices using device-specific checklists

  • OtherInhaler Use Instruction

    Participants will then be given step-by-step verbal instructions and a copy of written instructions by the trained educator describing appropriate inhaler technique for their respiratory inhalers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inhaler technique assessment

    Participants' overall inhaler technique will be scored via observation by a trained research educator. This assessment will follow a validated checklist and scoring system based the inhaler the patient is using. For example, if the patient is using a Spiriva handihaler, each of the following steps will be marked as either complete or incomplete: removes cap of inhaler and spacer, shakes inhaler up and down, attaches inhaler to spacer, breathes out fully, breathes out away from spacer/MDI, closes lips around spacer mouthpiece, presses down on canister one time, breathes in slowly, holds breath for at least five seconds, removes spacer from mouth before breathing normally, breathes normally for at least 30-60 seconds, repeats steps 2-11 for second puff. There will be a designated spot for any qualitative findings identified by the educator. Scores will be compared to baseline and post-training results at 6 weeks post-inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Estimated inhaled dosage

    Estimated inhaled dosage is estimated by the prototype training device and is used to inform the training session. Dosage will be compared to the baseline and training session. Dosage will be compared to the baseline and training session results at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Usability

    To assess the overall usability and acceptability of the system, a short Likert-type usability survey will be developed based on the system usability scale and tailored to their inhaler type. For example, participants may be asked on a scale from 1-5, to what degree they agree to statements similar to "I thought the training system was easy to use", with 1 being strongly disagree, and 5 being strongly agree. Participants will complete the assessment, which will be administered by a trained interviewer.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Spirometer pulmonary function measures

    Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1). Scores will be compared to baseline at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Spirometer pulmonary function measure: FVC

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). Scores will be compared to baseline at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Spirometer pulmonary function measure: PEF

    Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF). Scores will be compared to baseline at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Inhalation Parameters - flow slope

    Flow slope will be measured by the prototype trainer device and compared to the baseline and training session at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Inhalation Parameters - peak flow

    Peak flow will be measured by the prototype trainer device and compared to the baseline and training session at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Inhalation Parameters - total volume

    Total volume will be measured by the prototype trainer device and compared to the baseline and training session results at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  9. Symptom Control: mMRC

    Symptoms will be assessed with the mMRC(Modified Medical Research Counsel dyspnea scale assessment), a validated tool that stratifies severity of dyspnea in respiratory diseases, particularly COPD. It is often used to establish baseline functional impairment due to dyspnea attributable to respiratory disease. The minimum value from this tool is 0, which indicates that the patient "only gets breathless with strenuous exercise". The maximum value of the tool is 4, which indicates that the patient "is too breathless to leave the house or is breathless when dressing". Results will be compared to the baseline and training session results at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  10. Symptom Control: Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale

    Symptoms will be assessed with the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale. The minimum value of this tool is 0, which indicates that the patient experiences no shortness of breath. The maximum value of this tool is 10, which indicates that the patient is experiencing very severe shortness of breath. Results will be compared to the baseline and training session results at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  11. Symptom control: Asthma

    Asthma symptoms will be measured by the following assessments: ASSI (Asthma Symptom Severity Index). Patients will give a number in response to the question: "How is your asthma/COPD right now?" from 0 - 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms, and 10 indicating maximal symptoms. Results will be compared to the baseline and training session results at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  12. Disease control: COPD

    COPD disease control will be measured with the CAT (COPD Assessment Test), which is a questionnaire for people with COPD that is designed to measure the impact of COPD on a person's life. The questionnaire is composed of 8 statements/questions with which the patient responds on a 0-5 scale. Total scores for the questionnaire can range from 0 - 40, with 0 indicating well controlled COPD and 40 indicating extremely poorly controlled COPD. Results will be compared to the baseline and training session results at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  13. Disease control: Asthma

    Asthma control will be measured with the asthma control questionnaire. This questionnaire measures the adequacy of asthma control and change in asthma control that occurs either spontaneously or as a result of treatment. It is a 20 item questionnaire surveying effects of breathing problems on patients' everyday life. There are two sections to the questionnaire. The first 13 questions have answers ranging from 1-3, (1 = YES, 2 = NO, and 3 = N/A). The last 7 questions have answers ranging from 1-4 (1 = YES, 2 = NO, 3 = UNABLE, 4 = N/A). Results will be compared to the baseline and training session results at 6 weeks post inhaler technique training.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Koronis Biomedical Technology researchers and our collaborative research partners at the University of Chicago are active contributors to a variety of peer-reviewed publications, academic conference venues, and industrial consortiums. A wide variety of research conclusions stemming from the proposed project will be submitted for public disclosure through these various venues. We aim to spur improvements to COPD/asthma and COPD/asthma disease management options worldwide. It is our express intention to participate in the research endeavor of the larger research community and we have several strategies to explicitly share our data, insight and analysis tools while maintaining subject confidentiality. We intend to broadly disseminate our insights through prompt and complete publication in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, Koronis Biomedical Technologies will adopt the NIH Policy for dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical trial information, published in full as NOT-OD-16-149.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06461403
Lead sponsor
Koronis Biomedical Technologies
Collaborators
University of Chicago, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 17, 2024
Start date
Oct 9, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 28, 2026
Completion
Apr 28, 2026
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion